@techreport{BeuermannObergasselWangHelmreich2020,
  type      = {Working Paper},
  author    = {Beuermann, Christiane and Obergassel, Wolfgang and Wang-Helmreich, Hanna},
  title     = {Design options for the global stocktake : lessons from other review processes},
  series    = {Designing a robust stocktake},
  institution = {Wuppertal Institut f{\"u}r Klima, Umwelt, Energie},
  address   = {Wuppertal},
  url       = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-75256},
  pages     = {67},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {While the Paris Agreement (PA) has enshrined ambitious long-term objectives, the current actions of the Parties to the Agreement fall far short of these goals. The Global Stocktake (GST), established in Art. 14 of the PA, may help narrow this gap between ambition and action: its purpose is to review the implementation of the PA and to assess the collective progress of the international community towards Paris goals. While some general modalities on how to conduct the GST have been adopted, the details are still to be determined. The objective of this report is to analyze existing international regimes as regards their review processes, the contribution of these review processes to various governance functions and, finally, to derive lessons for the GST. Processes analyzed include: the design of the upcoming Global Stocktake itself, the Talanoa Dialogue (TD) which is the direct precursor of the GST, the Agenda 2030 High-Level Political Forum (HLPF), which features a regular stocktaking process focused on progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the review processes of the UN human rights system (UNHRS) and the review processes and assessment panels of the Montreal Protocol (MP). The analysis of each review process is organised in four section: (1) political background and context, (2) technical and organisational details of the processes, (3) interface between the political and technical processes, and (4) how the review processes contribute to achieving the objectives of the respective regime, particularly governance functions of the regime (guidance and signal, transparency and accountability, and knowledge and learning).},
  language  = {en}
}