@inproceedings{SchaeferSparenbergTholenThomasetal.2017, author = {Sch{\"a}fer-Sparenberg, Carolin and Tholen, Lena and Thomas, Stefan and Wei{ß}, Uta and Dinges, Katja and F{\"o}rster, Sonja}, title = {The future of EU energy efficiency policies : a comprehensive analysis of gaps, shortcomings, and potential remedies}, booktitle = {Consumption, efficiency and limits : ECEEE 2017 Summer Study ; 29 May-03 June 2017, Presqu'ile de Giens, France ; proceedings}, publisher = {Europ. Council for an Energy Efficient Economy}, address = {Stockholm}, url = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-68253}, pages = {81 -- 91}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Energy efficiency activities are high on the current EU energy policy agenda. Key policy instruments like the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED), the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) and the Energy Labelling Directive are under revision. In a project for the German government, we therefore analysed the effectiveness and consistency of existing sectoral policy packages anew, to open the discussion on which policy changes to the EU's energy efficiency policy packages are crucial to reach the targets. This comprehensive review addressed the industrial, buildings, and transport sectors plus the overarching governance framework (targets and roadmaps, EED, energy taxation and EU ETS). For each of these, the first step was a gap analysis of the main deficits in the sectoral policy packages, against effective model packages. At first glance, the combination of energy efficiency policies at EU level seems already quite comprehensive. However, their design and implementation often lack a consistent and ambitious approach to leverage their full potential. To give some examples of the many shortcomings identified, the governance framework suffers from exceptions and the transport sector being only marginally considered in the EED; an outdated Energy Tax Directive has very low minimum rates and several exception clauses; there is a lack of commitment to implement energy management systems and investment projects in large companies; a clear EU-wide definition of nearly zero energy buildings (nZEB) is missing; and the labelling of energy-using products is still confusing for consumers. Subsequently, we elaborated comprehensive policy recommendations to increase the effectiveness of all these policies, and to bridge some gaps with new policies. A list of priorities was established to sort them by their relevance.}, language = {en} }