@article{PfenningerHirthSchlechtetal.2018, author = {Pfenninger, Stefan and Hirth, Lion and Schlecht, Ingmar and Schmid, Eva and Wiese, Frauke and Brown, Tom and Davis, Chris and Gidden, Matthew and Heinrichs, Heide and Heuberger, Clara and Hilpert, Simon and Krien, Uwe and Matke, Carsten and Nebel, Arjuna and Morrison, Robbie and M{\"u}ller, Berit and Ple{ß}mann, Guido and Reeg, Matthias and Richstein, J{\"o}rn C. and Shivakumar, Abhishek and Staffel, Iain and Tr{\"o}ndle, Tim and Wingenbach, Clemens}, title = {Opening the black box of energy modelling : strategies and lessons learned}, journal = {Energy strategy reviews}, volume = {19}, doi = {10.1016/j.esr.2017.12.002}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-69345}, pages = {63 -- 71}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The global energy system is undergoing a major transition, and in energy planning and decision-making across governments, industry and academia, models play a crucial role. Because of their policy relevance and contested nature, the transparency and open availability of energy models and data are of particular importance. Here we provide a practical how-to guide based on the collective experience of members of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative (Openmod). We discuss key steps to consider when opening code and data, including determining intellectual property ownership, choosing a licence and appropriate modelling languages, distributing code and data, and providing support and building communities. After illustrating these decisions with examples and lessons learned from the community, we conclude that even though individual researchers' choices are important, institutional changes are still also necessary for more openness and transparency in energy research.}, language = {en} }