@article{ViebahnNitschFischedicketal.2007,
  author    = {Viebahn, Peter and Nitsch, Joachim and Fischedick, Manfred and Esken, Andrea and Sch{\"u}wer, Dietmar and Supersberger, Nikolaus and Zuberb{\"u}hler, Ulrich and Edenhofer, Ottmar},
  title     = {Comparison of carbon capture and storage with renewable energy technologies regarding structural, economic, and ecological aspects in Germany},
  journal   = {International journal of greenhouse gas control},
  volume    = {1},
  number    = {1},
  doi       = {10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00024-2},
  pages     = {121 -- 133},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {For the option of “carbon capture and storage”, an integrated assessment in the form of a life cycle analysis and a cost assessment combined with a systematic comparison with renewable energies regarding future conditions in the power plant market for the situation in Germany is done. The calculations along the whole process chain show that CCS technologies emit per kWh more than generally assumed in clean-coal concepts (total CO2 reduction by 72-90\% and total greenhouse gas reduction by 65-79\%) and considerable more if compared with renewable electricity. Nevertheless, CCS could lead to a significant absolute reduction of GHG-emissions within the electricity supply system. Furthermore, depending on the growth rates and the market development, renewables could develop faster and could be in the long term cheaper than CCS based plants. Especially, in Germany, CCS as a climate protection option is phasing a specific problem as a huge amount of fossil power plant has to be substituted in the next 15 years where CCS technologies might be not yet available. For a considerable contribution of CCS to climate protection, the energy structure in Germany requires the integration of capture ready plants into the current renewal programs. If CCS retrofit technologies could be applied at least from 2020, this would strongly decrease the expected CO2 emissions and would give a chance to reach the climate protection goal of minus 80\% including the renewed fossil-fired power plants.},
  language  = {en}
}