TY  - JOUR
U1  - Zeitschriftenartikel, wissenschaftlich - begutachtet (reviewed)
A1  - Mors, Emma ter
A1  - Terwel, Bart W.
A1  - Daamen, Dancker D. L.
A1  - Reiner, David M.
A1  - Schumann, Diana
A1  - Anghel, Sorin
A1  - Boulouta, Ioanna
A1  - Cismaru, Diana M.
A1  - Constantin, Carmencita
A1  - Jager, Chris C. H. de
A1  - Dudu, Alexandra
A1  - Esken, Andrea
A1  - Falup, Oana C.
A1  - Firth, Rebecca M.
A1  - Gemeni, Vassiliki
A1  - Hendriks, Chris
A1  - Ivan, Loredana
A1  - Koukouzas, Nikolaos
A1  - Markos, Angelos
A1  - Næss, Robert
A1  - Pietzner, Katja
A1  - Samoila, Irene R.
A1  - Sava, Constantin S.
A1  - Stephenson, Michael H.
A1  - Tomescu, Claudia E.
A1  - Torvatn, Hans Y.
A1  - Tvedt, Sturle D.
A1  - Vallentin, Daniel
A1  - West, Julia M.
A1  - Ziogou, Fotini
T1  - A comparison of techniques used to collect informed public opinions about CCS : opinion quality after focus group discussions versus information-choice questionnaires
N2  - Both focus group discussions and information-choice questionnaires (ICQs) have previously been used to examine informed public opinions about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). This paper presents an extensive experimental study to systematically examine and compare the quality of opinions created by these two research techniques. Depending on experimental condition, participants either participated in a focus group meeting or completed an ICQ. In both conditions participants received identical factual information about two specific CCS options. After having processed the information, they indicated their overall opinion about each CCS option. The quality of these opinions was determined by looking at three outcome-oriented indicators of opinion quality: consistency, stability, and confidence. Results for all three indicators showed that ICQs yielded higher-quality opinions than focus groups, but also that focus groups did not perform poor in this regard. Implications for the choice between focus group discussions and ICQs are discussed.
T2  - International journal of greenhouse gas control
VL  - 18
Y1  - 2013
U6  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.015
DO  - https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.07.015
SP  - 256
EP  - 263
ER  -