TY - RPRT U1 - Forschungsbericht A1 - Rayner, Tim A1 - Shawoo, Zoha A1 - Hermwille, Lukas A1 - Obergassel, Wolfgang A1 - Mersmann, Florian A1 - Asche, Friederike A1 - Rudolph, Frederic A1 - Lah, Oliver A1 - Kodukala, Santhosh A1 - Oberthùˆr, Sebastian A1 - Khandekar, Gauri A1 - Wyns, Tomas A1 - Kretschmer, Bianka A1 - Jones, Damon A1 - Melkie, Mahlet A1 - Zamarioli, Luis T1 - Evaluating the adequacy of the outcome of COP21 in the context of the development of the broader international climate regime complex : deliverable 4.2 ; COP21 - results and implications for pathways and policies for low emissions European societies N2 - Much mitigation-related governance activity is evident in a range of sectoral systems, and regarding particular governance functions. However, there is a tendency for this activity to relate to the easiest functions to address, such as "learning and knowledge building", or to take place in somewhat limited "niches". Across all sectoral systems examined, the gap between identified governance needs and what is currently supplied is most serious in terms of the critical function of setting rules to facilitate collective action. A lack of "guidance and signal" is also evident, particularly in the finance, extractive industries, energy-intensive industries, and buildings sectoral systems. Of the sectoral systems examined, the power sector appears the most advanced in covering the main international governance functions required of it. Nevertheless, it still falls short in achieving critical governance functions necessary for sufficient decarbonisation. Significantly, while the signal is strong and clear for the phase-in of renewable energy, it is either vague or absent when it comes to the phase-out of fossil fuel-generated electricity. The same lack of signal that certain high-carbon activities need actively to be phased out is also evident in financial, fossil-fuel extractive industry and transport-related sectors. More effective mitigation action will need greater co-ordination or orchestration effort, sometimes led by the UNFCCC, but also from the bodies such as the G20, as well as existing (or potentially new) sector-level institutions. The EU needs to re-consider what it means to provide climate leadership in an increasingly "polycentric" governance landscape. Y1 - 2018 U6 - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-72042 UN - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:bsz:wup4-opus-72042 SP - 308 S1 - 308 PB - Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations CY - Paris ER -