Volltext-Downloads (blau) und Frontdoor-Views (grau)

Who is self-committed to climate action? : Exploring decarbonisation actions and target gaps using carbon footprint calculator data in Japan

  • Given the urgent need to promote climate-friendly behaviours, the implementation of carbon footprint calculators with actionable recommendations is increasing. This study analysed data from >7000 users of a Japanese carbon footprint calculator to investigate the characteristics and factors affecting voluntary commitment to decarbonisation actions and the gaps in achieving the 1.5-degree mitigation target. The results showed voluntarily committed actions were insufficient to meet the 2030 personal carbon footprint target, with only 31 %, 18 %, and 7.3 % of users potentially achieving targets in the domains of housing, mobility, and goods/services, respectively. The seven user segments that were identified exhibited very different levels ofGiven the urgent need to promote climate-friendly behaviours, the implementation of carbon footprint calculators with actionable recommendations is increasing. This study analysed data from >7000 users of a Japanese carbon footprint calculator to investigate the characteristics and factors affecting voluntary commitment to decarbonisation actions and the gaps in achieving the 1.5-degree mitigation target. The results showed voluntarily committed actions were insufficient to meet the 2030 personal carbon footprint target, with only 31 %, 18 %, and 7.3 % of users potentially achieving targets in the domains of housing, mobility, and goods/services, respectively. The seven user segments that were identified exhibited very different levels of engagement. For example, "lifestyle change enthusiasts" committed to as many as 25 actions, corresponding to an equivalent of 2.8 tCO2e of footprint reduction, while "curious bystanders" rarely committed to any actions. Demographically, younger and male users tended to prioritise high-impact actions, whereas female users and users aged 50–60 years old were more likely to commit to a range of actions. Notably, actions requiring substantial financial investment had an 8 % lower commitment probability, and "shift" actions were 6 % less preferred than "avoid" actions". These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the considerable gap between self-committed actions and mitigation targets, and suggest that more effective use of footprint information could facilitate greater engagement. Tailored strategies could better motivate the "curious bystanders" segment and encourage female and older users to focus on high-impact actions.show moreshow less

Export metadata

Additional Services

Search Google Scholar    

Statistics

frontdoor_oas
Metadaten
Document Type:Peer-Reviewed Article
Author:Ryu Koide, Sho Hata, Ryo Tajima, Hide-Fumi Yokoo, Michael Lettenmeier, Keisuke Nansai
DOI (citable link):https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.103930
Year of Publication:2025
Language:English
Source Title (English):Energy research & social science
Volume:120
Article Number:103930
Divisions:Nachhaltiges Produzieren und Konsumieren
Dewey Decimal Classification:300 Sozialwissenschaften