The production of commodities by energy-intensive industry is responsible for 1/3 of annual global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The climate goal of the Paris Agreement, to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels while pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C, requires global GHG emissions reach net-zero and probably negative by 2055-2080. Given the average economic lifetime of industrial facilities is 20 years or more, this indicates all new investment must be net-zero emitting by 2035-2060 or be compensated by negative emissions to guarantee GHG-neutrality. We argue, based on a sample portfolio of emerging and near-commercial technologies for each sector (largely based on zero carbon electricity & heat sources, biomass and carbon capture, and catalogued in an accompanying database), that reducing energy-intensive industrial GHG emissions to Paris Agreement compatible levels may not only be technically possible, but can be achieved with sufficient prioritization and policy effort. We then review policy options to drive innovation and investment in these technologies. From this we synthesize a preliminary integrated strategy for a managed transition with minimum stranded assets, unemployment, and social trauma that recognizes the competitive and globally traded nature of commodity production. The strategy includes: an initial policy commitment followed by a national and sectoral stakeholder driven pathway process to build commitment and identify opportunities based on local zero carbon resources; penetration of near-commercial technologies through increasing valuation of GHG material intensity through GHG pricing or flexible regulations with protection for competitiveness and against carbon leakage; research and demand support for the output of pilot plants, including some combination of guaranteed above-market prices that decline with output and an increasing requirement for low carbon inputs in government procurement; and finally, key supporting institutions.
Die Diskussion um die Gestaltung der Energiewende dreht sich in der politischen und gesellschaftlichen Debatte heute maßgeblich um die Stromversorgung der Zukunft. Ausstieg aus der Kohleverstromung und Ausbau bzw. Optimierung von Stromtransport- und verteilnetz sind nur zwei Beispiele dafür. Zu wenig Beachtung wird dagegen den Gasinfrastrukturen geschenkt und dabei insbesondere den Gas(import-)infrastrukturen, die mit Blick auf die Energiewende eine signifikante Rolle spielen (können).
Given large potentials of the MENA region for renewable energy production, transitions towards renewables-based energy systems seem a promising way for meeting growing energy demand while contributing to greenhouse gas emissions reductions according to the Paris Agreement at the same time. Supporting and steering transitions to a low-carbon energy system require a clear understanding of socio-technical interdependencies in the energy system as well as of the principle dynamics of system innovations. For facilitating such understanding, a phase model for renewables-based energy transitions in MENA countries, which structures the transition process over time through the differentiation of a set of sub-sequent distinct phases, is developed in this article. The phase model builds on a phase model depicting the German energy transition, which was complemented by insights about transition governance and adapted to reflect characteristics of the MENA region. The resulting model includes four phases ("Take-off renewables", "System integration", "Power to fuel/gases”, "Towards 100% renewables”), each of which is characterized by a different cluster of innovations. These innovations enter the system via three stages of development which describe different levels of maturity and market penetration, and which require appropriate governance. The phase model has the potential to support strategy development and governance of energy transitions in MENA countries in two complementary ways: it provides an overview of techno-economic developments as orienting guidelines for decision-makers, and it adds some guidance as to which governance approaches are suitable for supporting those developments.
Obwohl viele der aktuellen Herausforderungen im Bereich der Energieversorgung eine internationale Dimension haben bzw. nur international gelöst werden können, ist die internationale Energiepolitik bis heute ein weitgehend ungesteuerter Politikbereich. Im letzten Jahrzehnt entwickelten sich zwar neue globale Kooperationsstrukturen und Initiativen, der Weg zu einer multilateralen, globalen Governance-Struktur, die zentrale Impulse für die gemeinsame Etablierung international geltender Normen und Regeln geben könnte, ist aber noch weit. Der Artikel führt in die aktuellen Entwicklungen ein und diskutiert die verbleibenden Herausforderungen.
At current primary steel production levels, the iron and steel industry will fail to meet the 80% emission reduction target without introduction of breakthrough technologies (Wörtler et al., 2013: 19). The current research analyses the technical and economical long-term potential of innovative primary steel production technologies in Germany throughout 2100. Techno-economic models are used to simulate three innovative ore-based steelmaking routes verses the reference blast furnace route (BF-BOF). The innovative routes in focus are blast furnace with CCS (BF-CCS), hydrogen direct reduction (H-DR), and iron ore electrolysis (EW). Energy and mass flows for the production of one tonne of crude steel (CS) are combined with hypothetical price, cost, and revenue data to evaluate the production routes economically, technically, and environmentally. This is a purely theoretical analysis and hence further external factors that may influence practical implementation or profitability are not considered.
Different future developments are considered by using three scenarios, representing an ambitious, a moderate, and a conservative transformation of the German energy sector. In general, looking into the future bares various uncertainties which should be reflected in a suitable manner.
According to the present scenario analysis, chances are that with rising prices for coal and CO2 allowances BF-BOF and even BF-CCS become unprofitable by mid-century. With a high share of renewable energy sources and high prices for CO2 allowances, H-DR and EW become economically attractive in the second half of the current century, when BF-based routes are long unprofitable. Energy and raw material efficiency is significantly higher for H-DR and EW and furthermore, the 80% reduction target by 2050 can be achieved in the ambitious scenario. However, high investment costs and high dependency on electricity prices prohibit a profitable implementation before 2030–2040 without further subsidies. EW is the most energy and resource efficient production route. Since continuous electricity is needed for the continuous operation, the electricity costs are 20–40% higher than for H-DR (with high-capacity hydrogen storage units). Even though hydrogen production implies efficiency losses compared to the EW route, the decoupling of hydrogen production from continuous operation of the steel plant through hydrogen storage offers the opportunity to use cheap excess renewable electricity. This makes the H-DR economically and environmentally the most attractive route and provides a crucial contribution to stabilize the grid and to store excess energy in a 100% renewable energy system.
Based on different current long-term energy scenarios the paper discusses the future perspectives of hydrogen in the German energy system as a representative example for the development of sustainable energy systems. The scenario analysis offers varying outlines of the future energy system that determine the possible role of hydrogen. The paper discusses the possibilities of expanding the share of renewable energy and the resulting prospects for establishing clean hydrogen production from renewable energy sources. Emphasis is given to the questions of an ecologically efficient allocation of limited renewable energy resources that can only be assessed from asystems analysis perspective. Findings from recent studies for Germany reveal a strong competition between the direct input into the electricity system and an indirect use as fuel in the transport sector. Moreover, the analysis underlines the paramount importance of reducing energy demand as the inevitable prerequisite for any renewable energy system.
Die Landesregierung in NRW hat am 14.4.2015 den in einem aufwändigen Stakeholderprozess erstellten Klimaschutzplan vorgestellt. Eines der Ziele war, die Klimaschutzpolitik als langfristige Strukturpolitik zu implementieren und entsprechende Prozesse in die Breite der Gesellschaft zu tragen. Weitere Bundesländer und der Bund selbst haben inzwischen ähnliche Prozesse eingeleitet. In zahlreichen anderen Ländern gibt es Beschlüsse, die in diese Richtung gehen. Eine Übersicht über den Prozess der Planerstellung in NRW und über den Stand der Diskussion in Deutschland verdeutlicht, wie Klimaschutzpläne durch partizipatorische Elemente in der Erstellungsphase mehr Akzeptanz erfahren können.
Staatliche Regulierung ist verpönt. Häufig läuft es dann auf den Appell hinaus: Jeder einzelne Bürger habe es selbst in der Hand. Doch die Alltagsroutinen sind in der Regel mächtiger als das Umweltbewusstsein. Beim Marmor für das Badezimmer spielen Amortisationszeiten keine Rolle. Die solare Warmwasseranlage ist dagegen oftmals "zu teuer". Gesetzliche Standards hingegen verselbstständigen Energieeffizienz und den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien. Sie machen "Öko zur Routine". Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Notwendigkeit für das Schaffen neuer Routinen und zeigt wie dies durch Standards, Limits und faire Umsetzungsbedingungen sowie attraktive Alternativangebote zum gegenwärtigen, häufig nicht nachhaltigen Verhalten auch möglich ist.
Die Vision einer klimafreundlichen zukünftigen energetischen Nutzung von Wasserstoff ist untrennbar mit dessen Erzeugung auf der Basis von regenerativer Energie verknüpft. Für einen Übergangszeitraum kann der Rückgriff auf anderweitig in Industrieprozessen erzeugten Wasserstoff einschließlich vorhandener Infrastrukturelemente sinnvoll sein. Nordrhein-Westfalen bietet hierfür mit dem Rhein-Ruhr-Raum besonders günstige Voraussetzungen und verfügt über zahlreiche Standorte, die sich für energetische Pioniernutzungen von Wasserstoff anbieten. Der Beitrag verknüpft die Erhebung der verfügbaren Wasserstoffmengen in NRW mit der Modellierung des Aufbaus einer Wasserstoffinfrastruktur in NRW und stellt dabei die besondere Ausgangslage des Bundeslandes heraus.