Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (432) (remove)
Division
- Energie-, Verkehrs- und Klimapolitik (432) (remove)
While digital technologies hold significant transformational potential, anecdotal evidence suggests that the digital transformation might not be directed towards sustainable development sufficiently. Drawing on a modified and extended version of the framework proposed by Wanzenböck et al. (2020), we explore the cases of the circular economy and the transition towards a sustainable energy system in the twin transition. Making use of insights from 20 expert interviews and two in-depth interviews, we aim to gain a first careful indication of the convergence/divergence in societal views on key problems and solutions across different dimensions (technological, economic, socio-cultural, regulatory) and derive insights for integrated policy-making. Thereby the study contributes to bridging the existing gap between mission-oriented policies and the twin transition. Overall, our first insights indicate that while showing high similarities in the structure of problems and solutions across cases, the variety in wickedness (contestation, complexity, uncertainty) calls for differentiated policy-making: Significant parts of the relatively young twin transition might be in a state of disorientation where societal views on problems and solutions diverge. This would require policy-makers to follow a "discovery-mode" (basic research, experiments and monitoring) with only selected diffusion-focused strategies. Further, we show that missions in the twin transition require highly flexible policy-making as different approaches need to be applied simultaneously. Finally, there are several options for exploiting synergies in policy-making due to some overlapping characteristics as well as learning opportunities between cases. We believe that particularly our holistic perspective on the twin transition can yield substantial guidance for researchers and policy-makers in the field.
In order to limit global warming and fulfill their contributions to the Paris agreement, both Germany and Japan have set targets for climate neutrality towards the middle of the century. Reaching these goals will imply transformation of all sectors of society to avoid all fossil greenhouse gas emissions, heavy industry not the least. The focus of this study is the transformation of the petrochemical industry. This sector can become climate neutral but cannot be "decarbonized", as carbon is integral to the chemical structures of the products like polymers and solvents. Reaching climate neutrality thus means that the whole lifecycle of the petrochemical products has to be regarded. Another specific challenge is today's synergetic relation of this industry to fossil transport fuel production, which cannot be maintained in a climate neutral world.
The two countries interestingly share a similar industrial structure overall, and the chemical and petrochemical industry is one of the major industries in both countries. The countries' respective chemical industries are the third and fourth largest in the world in terms of sales, but at the same time, these industries represent just over 5% of the respective countries' greenhouse gas emissions. However, these scope 1 emissions of the chemical industry itself are far less relevant than the end-of-life emissions of their products, which belong to scope 3 and are thus not counted under the chemical industry in the country greenhouse gas balances. To mediate these emissions, there is a need to set the direction, draw out paths and investigate possible alternatives for how the petrochemical industry can be become climate neutral. In this report, the existing scenario analyses, energy strategies and roadmaps dealing with this issue in the two countries are compared, as well as the current state of their petrochemical industries. We highlight similarities, differences and identify possible areas of cooperation and exchange in order to find robust paths forward for the transformation of the petrochemical industries.
Established in 2016, the German-Japanese Energy Transition Council (GJETC) strives to promote bilateral cooperation between Germany and Japan on energy transition. Among other studies and topical papers, an output paper in 2020 (Rauschen et al., 2020) already compared the energy efficiency in buildings in both countries with a particular focus on heating and cooling. One important finding of this output paper was that further efforts in the building sector are needed to improve the energy efficiency of buildings in Germany and Japan. Following the more ambitious climate protection targets in both countries, this study seeks to analyze the German and Japanese policies put in place to accelerate the decarbonization of the building sector. The decarbonization of the vast number of buildings that both Japan and Germany are facing will be a major contribution to achieving the GHG reduction targets of both countries and should continue to be discussed among experts and developed into a discussion among policy makers.
This report examines and compares the characteristics of the building stock in both countries, as well as existing policies and new strategies and policies that are planned or discussed to achieve energy conservation and decarbonization of buildings. The current shape of buildings, especially houses, is greatly influenced by the land area of the country corresponding to the available space for buildings, the natural environment surrounding the country, the natural resources available, and the lifestyle and cultural ideas that have been passed down and taken root over time. Therefore, it might be difficult to compare them and the corresponding strategies and policies with the same yardstick, so we also discuss common or deviant situations. Through this joint research, we aim to find each other's advantages and challenges and to develop useful and concrete policy recommendations that will contribute to decarbonization policies in both countries.
Mit verschiedenen Wohnbauoffensiven versuchen viele Kommunen dem vorherrschenden Wohnraummangel entgegenzuwirken. Der Neubau von Häusern nimmt viel Fläche in Anspruch und verbraucht viele Ressourcen. Dabei lässt sich ein Großteil des Wohnraumbedarfs durch bestehende Wohngebäude decken, wenn sich Menschen an biografischen Wendepunkten, wie etwa Auszug der Kinder, für kleinere Wohnflächen und alternative Wohnkonzepte entscheiden würden.
Das Projekt OptiWohn ging darum der Frage nach, wie eine optimierte Nutzung der Wohnfläche proaktiv gefördert werden kann. Herzstück bildet die Entwicklung und Gründung von kommunalen Wohnraumagenturen. Sie identifizieren Wohnraumbedarfe im Quartier, bieten Beratung für Wohnungssuchende an, vermitteln alternative Wohnungen oder initiieren Angebote zum Wohnungstausch.
Neben dem Beratungs- und Förderangebot zur Optimierung der Wohnflächennutzung in den Städten Köln, Göttingen und Tübingen wurden die Ergebnisse in kommunale Handlungsempfehlungen übertragen, die neben Städten und Kommunen auch weitere Akteure ansprechen sollen. Darüber hinaus entwarfen die Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler ein bundesweites Förderprogramm für flächeneffizientes Wohnen.
Der hier vorliegende Klimaschutz-Aktionsplan 2030 für die Stadt Mannheim beschreibt Maßnahmen und Reduktionspfade für eine Minderung der Treibhausgasemissionen auf Mannheimer Stadtgebiet zur Erreichung der Klimaneutralität im Jahr 2030. Die Basis hierfür bildet die Energie- und CO2-Bilanz aus dem Jahr 2020.
In einem ersten Schritt wurden mit dem wissenschaftlichen Begleitkreis mögliche Reduktionspfade in den verschiedenen Sektoren und eine Definition für den Begriff der Klimaneutralität diskutiert. Mit dem Lenkungskreis wurden im nächsten Schritt acht Handlungsfelder festgelegt, für die in einzelnen Strategiegruppen die Maßnahmen entwickelt wurden. Weitere Vorschläge kamen aus der begleitenden öffentlichen Beteiligung. In diesem breit angelegten Beteiligungsprozess sind letztlich 81 Maßnahmen in acht thematischen Handlungsfeldern entstanden, von denen 34 als Maßnahmen von besonderer Priorität definiert wurden.
Die große Herausforderung der Industrietransformation ist von besonderer Bedeutung für Nordrhein-Westfalen als eine der wichtigsten Industrieregionen Deutschlands und Europas, in der etwa die Hälfte der Anlagen der energieintensiven Grundstoffindustrie Deutschlands verortet sind und in der die industrielle Produktion wirtschaftlich eine besonders große Rolle spielt. Gleichzeitig kann eine gelingende Transformation der Industrie in NRW als Blaupause für andere Regionen dienen. Der vorliegende Bericht stellt die Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts SCI4climate.NRW 2018-2022 dar, welches die Industrietransformation in NRW wissenschaftlich begleitet und untersucht hat.
As the climate crisis is accelerating and the pressure to act is steadily increasing, many companies are claiming themselves or their products carbon neutral. This is usually achieved by offsetting residual emissions with carbon certificates (carbon offsetting). However, recent revelations about the inadequate quality of carbon credits and legal uncertainties surrounding the use of such offset claims are increasingly raising doubts about this approach.
This Wuppertal Report examines how the EU can promote integrity in corporate climate action. Taking into account the new framework of the Paris Agreement, the paper outlines various options for how the EU could push for more integrity and effectively combat greenwashing through the targeted use of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.
In their recommendations, the authors advocate addressing the most serious consequences of ongoing offset practices through increased regulation of offset claims. If a ban on offset claims cannot be implemented, claims requirements and carbon offset regulations should be further specified, for example, by prohibiting any type of double counting of emissions reductions. In addition to tightening the rules for corporate offset claims within Europe, the EU could help partner countries make informed decisions when approving climate change mitigation measures and respective carbon credits. The report also emphasizes the EU's special role in international climate negotiations, where it should advocate for a strong legal framework for climate action under Article 6.