Refine
Document Type
- Report (12)
- Part of a Book (4)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (3)
- Contribution to Periodical (3)
- Working Paper (3)
Division
- Kreislaufwirtschaft (25) (remove)
CICERONE aims to bring national, regional and local governments together to jointly tackle the circular economy transition needed to reach net-zero carbon emissions and meet the targets set in the Paris Agreement and EU Green Deal. This document represents one of the key outcomes of the project: a Strategic Research & Innovation Agenda (SRIA) for Europe, to support owners and funders of circular economy programmes in aligning priorities and approaching the circular economy transition in a systemic way.
Treating waste as a resource and the design of a circular economy have been identified as key approaches for resource efficiency. Despite ambitious targets, policies and instruments that would enable a transition from a conventional waste management to an integrated and comprehensive resource management are still missing. Moreover, this will require innovative policy mixes which do not only address different end-of-pipe approaches but integrate various resource efficiency aspects from product design to patterns of production and consumption. Based on the results of a project funded by the Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development named "POLFREE - Policy Options for a resource efficient economy", this paper addresses several aspects of the conceptualization of policy mixes with regard to waste as a specific resource efficiency challenge. The guiding research interest of this paper is the combination of policies necessary to create a full circular economy. In a first step, the present waste policy frameworks, institutions and existing incentives at national level are examined in order to disclose regulatory and policy gaps. Based on this, the second part of the paper describes and analyses specific waste-related resource efficiency instruments with regard to their potential impacts under the constraints of various barriers. Based on the assessment of the country analyses and the innovative instruments, the paper draws conclusions on waste policy mixes and political needs.
The ultimate goal of German Resource Efficiency Programme (ProgRess) is to make the extraction and use of natural resources more sustainable and reduce associated environmental pollution as much as possible. By doing this - also with responsibility towards future generations - the programme should create a prerequisite for securing a long-term high quality of life. To bring the policy approaches formulated in ProgRess to reality, efforts to implement resource efficiency measures have to be increased at all levels - from international to regional to local.
The chapter intends to provide an impetus for the current debate on ProgRess policy development. The chapter identifies, analyses and describes deficits and possibilities of vertical integration of the German programme in particular and derives recommendations for action which may also serve as indications for other strategies. The following sections are based on results of the advisory report "Vertical integration of the national resource efficiency programme ProgRess (VertRess)", conducted by the German Institute of Urban Affairs (Difu) and the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy on behalf of the German Environmental Agency (UBA) and the Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU).
Das Vorhaben analysiert 1.) die Argumente verschiedener Positionen im Wachstumsdiskurs und formuliert eine idealtypische "vorsorgeorientierte Postwachstumsposition". Er präsentiert zudem Ursachen von Wirtschaftswachstum und identifiziert gesellschaftliche Bereiche, deren Funktion vom Wirtschaftswachstum abhängen könnte. Darüber hinaus werden Reformvorschläge diskutiert, um diese Wachstumsabhängigkeit zu verringern. Das Vorhaben untersucht 2.) die Relevanz der Postwachstumsdebatte für Ressourcenpolitik und eine entsprechende Instrumentierung. Außerdem werden 3.) konstitutive Kernelemente einer nachhaltigen (Postwachstums-)Gesellschaft bestimmt. Das Vorhaben setzt damit Impulse zur gesellschaftlichen Debatte über die Ausgestaltung und Instrumentierung von Transformationspfaden für "gesellschaftliches Wohlergehen innerhalb planetarer Grenzen".
Abfallvermeidung steht an der Spitze der Abfallhierarchie und sollte daher mit höchster Priorität behandelt werden - auch in den Kreislaufwirtschaftspolitiken auf kommunaler Ebene. Ein Leitfaden mit 19 praxisorientierten Handlungsempfehlungen soll Kommunen nun unterstützen, Abfallvermeidung systematisch und erfolgreich umzusetzen.
Der Handlungsleitfaden ist ein Ergebnis des Projekts Circular Cities NRW: Das Wuppertal Institut hat gemeinsam mit der FernUniversität Hagen die 22 kreisfreien Städte in Nordrhein-Westfalen (NRW) sowie sechs internationale Referenzfälle in Bezug auf ihre Abfallvermeidungsmaßnahmen analysiert. Das Ergebnis: Die NRW-Städte gehen Abfallvermeidung zwar zunehmend an, allerdings bestehen große Unterschiede bei der Breite der Maßnahmen und den thematischen Schwerpunkten. Darüber hinaus haben die Forschenden viele nicht ausgeschöpfte Handlungspotenziale identifiziert.
Der Leitfaden enthält Maßnahmen, mit denen Kommunen Abfallvermeidung systematisch, verwaltungsweit, sektorenübergreifend und verknüpft mit anderen Klimaschutz- und Nachhaltigkeitsaktivitäten angehen können. Besonders interessant für die Kommunen: Einige der Handlungsempfehlungen sind einfach umzusetzen, kostengünstig und ermöglichen schnelle Abfallvermeidungserfolge.
Der vorliegende Beitrag analysiert die Bedeutung der Abfallvermeidung auf kommunaler Ebene. Besonderes Augenmerk liegt dabei auf der Rolle von Städten bei der Abfallvermeidung und der Notwendigkeit strategischer Konzepte sowie praktischer Umsetzungsstrategien. Es wird herausgearbeitet, dass das Initiieren von Abfallvermeidungsmaßnahmen auf kommunaler Ebene auf verschiedene Herausforderungen stoßen kann, wie beispielsweise die Abstimmung bestehender Konsum- und Entsorgungsmuster sowie das Fehlen geeigneter Anreize für Akteure. Es wird gezeigt, inwiefern der Ansatz der Zero Waste City ein Instrument zur Förderung der kommunalen Abfallvermeidung darstellen kann und welche Ziele und Maßnahmen die Zero Waste Cities Kiel und München in ihre Zero-Waste-Konzepte aufgenommen haben. Darüber hinaus werden Handlungsempfehlungen zur Stärkung der Abfallvermeidung in der Kommune, in der Verwaltung und in Bezug auf spezifische Abfallfraktionen präsentiert.
The transition to a greener and more circular economy has been a European policy priority for several years. The Circular Economy Action Plan of 2020 underlines the ambition. The following EEA initiatives are meant to support the transition process:
- Bellagio Process on circular economy monitoring principles (EPA network);
- Enhancement of EEA indicators on circular economy (ETC/WMGE);
- Explorative work on novel data streams (FWC);
- Co-creation work - knowledge sharing of monitoring experience (ETC/Eionet).
The scope of the present task was to report on the co-creation process that was undertaken at the end of 2020. The co-creation process was organised to identify:
(i) best practices on monitoring strategies, data sources and target setting; and
(ii) areas of circularity measuring and monitoring that remain challenging and require additional investment.
The co-creation process partially built on the work done during the Bellagio Process/Initiative which was run in parallel. This ETC report presents and documents the evidence gathered throughout the co- creation process as well as providing a retrospective analysis of the links to the Bellagio Principles.
With the introduction of the Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe (2011) and the more recent commitment of The Action Plan towards the Circular Economy (2015), the European Commission (EC) has expressed its fundamental interest to substantially improve the resource efficiency of the European economy and enable the transition towards the Circular Economy (CE). This policy push has meanwhile been complemented by some quite ambitious national programmes for RE and CE and institutional advances but it is not yet bound to targets or mandatory reporting.
Against this background, the objective of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview of the current policy frameworks at EU and a selection of MSs and provide insights into the elements shaping policy processes. The analytical framework relies on three essential interconnected components: the policy framework, the economic incentive system and economic side policies which are relevant in the context of RE and CE and actor constellations. The paper does this looking at the interface between EU-MSs. The analysis is based on different empirical surveys in which the policy development is observed and discussed (EEA 2011, 2016a, 2016b, EIO 2013, 2014, 2016) and a comprehensive review of legislative and policy frameworks at the EU and selected MSs, undertaken as part of the project POLFREE (Policy option for a Resource-Efficient Economy) (Domenech et al., 2014, Bahn-Walkowiak et al., 2014). The analysis reveals that policy frameworks for RE/CE are complex and fragmented as competing goals and visions reduce effectiveness of measures. The paper makes recommendations as to how EU and MS policies could improve RE in a coordinated way, but recognizes that achieving such coordination will be challenging in the current political context.