Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (14)
- Conference Object (9)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (5)
- Working Paper (5)
- Contribution to Periodical (1)
In the energy sector, few topics, if any, are more hyped than hydrogen. Countries develop hydrogen strategies to provide a perspective for hydrogen production and use in order to meet climate-neutrality goals. However, in this topical field the role of water is less accentuated. Hence, in this study, we seek to map the interrelations between the water and wastewater sector on the one hand and the hydrogen sector on the other hand, before reflecting upon our findings in a country case study. We chose the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan because (i) hydrogen is politically discussed not least due to its high potentials for solar PV, and (ii) Jordan is water stressed - definitely a bad precondition for water-splitting electrolyzers. This research is based on a project called the German-Jordanian Water-Hydrogen-Dialogue (GJWHD), which started with comprehensive desk research mostly to map the intersectoral relations and to scope the situation in Jordan. Then, we carried out two expert workshops in Wuppertal, Germany, and Amman, Jordan, in order to further discuss the nexus by inviting a diverse set of stakeholders. The mapping exercise shows various options for hydrogen production and opportunities for planning hydrogen projects in water-scarce contexts such as Jordan.
Die große Herausforderung der Industrietransformation ist von besonderer Bedeutung für Nordrhein-Westfalen als eine der wichtigsten Industrieregionen Deutschlands und Europas, in der etwa die Hälfte der Anlagen der energieintensiven Grundstoffindustrie Deutschlands verortet sind und in der die industrielle Produktion wirtschaftlich eine besonders große Rolle spielt. Gleichzeitig kann eine gelingende Transformation der Industrie in NRW als Blaupause für andere Regionen dienen. Der vorliegende Bericht stellt die Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts SCI4climate.NRW 2018-2022 dar, welches die Industrietransformation in NRW wissenschaftlich begleitet und untersucht hat.
Enhancing evaluations of future energy-related product policies with the digital product passport
(2022)
Digital product passport : the ticket to achieving a climate neutral and circular European economy?
(2022)
The introduction of a Digital Product Passport (DPP) is an opportunity to create a system that can store and share all relevant information throughout a product's life cycle. This would provide industry stakeholders, businesses, public authorities and consumers with a better understanding of the materials used in the product as well as their embodied environmental impact.
With the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the cost-of-living crisis, now is a critical moment to transform our economic and business models, while also addressing the huge scale of material emissions. DPPs can be a pivotal policy instrument in this goal. Furthermore, DPPs can accelerate the twin green and digital transitions as part of EU efforts to deliver positive climate action and sustainable economies.
In 2020, the European Commission (EC) adopted a new Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), which emphasised the need for circular economy initiatives to consider the entire life cycle of products, from the production of basic materials to end-of-life disposal. The Circular Economy Package published in March 2022 includes a proposal for an Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), which builds upon the Ecodesign Directive that covers energy-related products.
A DPP will form a key regulatory element of the ESPR by enhancing the traceability of products and their components. This will provide consumers and manufacturers with the information needed to make better informed choices by taking their environmental impact into consideration.
As discussed in the report, there is widespread agreement amongst business leaders that a well-designed DPP could have both short- and longer-term benefits, improving access to reliable and comparable product sustainability information for businesses, consumers and policymakers.
A well-designed DPP can unify information, making it more readily accessible to all actors in the supply chain. This will support businesses to ensure an effective transformation towards a decarbonised industry. It could also create incentives for companies to make their products more sustainable, as improving access to reliable and consistent information across supply chains will make it easier for customers to make comparisons.
Umsetzung wie auch Förderung der Industrietransformation obliegen insbesondere Akteuren auf der europäischen sowie der nationalen Governance-Ebene. Gleichwohl sind vor dem Hintergrund der Dringlichkeit der Herausforderung und der Maßstabsebene eines Großteils der erforderlichen Maßnahmen auch kommunale Akteure und lokale Initiativen, darunter öffentliche Betreiber, Verwaltungen, öffentlich-private Kooperationen, Unternehmen oder zivilgesellschaftliche Gruppen in diesem Bereich von Bedeutung. Das liegt auch an der Tatsache, dass je nach wirtschaftlicher Struktur die Industrie für einen großen Teil der Treibhausgasemissionen in einer Kommune oder Region verantwortlich sein kann. Gleichzeitig gibt es vielfältige Stellschrauben vor Ort, um Klimaschutzmaßnahmen umzusetzen. Aufgrund der hohen Dichte an Akteuren und Institutionen bestehen auf der kommunalen Ebene große Handlungsmöglichkeiten für nachhaltige Transformationen, etwa im Bereich des Klimaschutzes.
Viele Kommunen setzen in ihren Klimaschutzkonzepten allerdings einen Schwerpunkt auf andere Bereiche, wie bspw. auf Klimaschutz bei öffentlichen Gebäuden, auch wegen der direkten Handlungsmöglichkeiten. Um die Industrie zu adressieren, greift die Kommunalverwaltung vornehmlich auf Beratungsangebote und Anreize zur Nutzung von erneuerbaren Energien zurück. Dabei gewinnt das Thema Klimaschutz gleichermaßen für Unternehmen wie auch für Kommunen immer weiter an Bedeutung. Für beide ist schon heute Klimaschutz ein wichtiger Wettbewerbs- und Standortfaktor.
Die bislang auf (Landes-)Politik, Unternehmen und Wissenschaft fokussierte Analyse der Industrietransformation in SCI4climate.NRW erweitert mit diesem Bericht den Blick auf die Einbindung und Rolle kommunaler Akteure, Strukturen und Prozesse. Es wird der Frage nachgegangen, welche Einflussmöglichkeiten Kommunen im Mehrebenen-Governance System der Industrietransformation in NRW haben und welche Interessen, Chancen und Herausforderungen seitens der Kommunen bestehen, um die Industrietransformation mitzugestalten.
Der Fokus wird dabei auf die Grundstoffindustrie, konkret auf die Chemie-, Stahl- und Zementindustrie, gelegt, da diese Industriezweige mit sehr hohen Treibhausgasemissionen verbunden sind und bislang bei der Frage nach kommunalen Handlungsmöglichkeiten von der Forschung noch wenig betrachtet wurden. Neben einer Literaturrecherche werden drei Fallstudien präsentiert, um sowohl die Möglichkeiten der Kommunen zu analysieren, aktuelle Aktivitäten einzuordnen sowie Chancen und Herausforderungen, die mit den Tätigkeiten verbunden sind, zu ermitteln.
Green hydrogen will play a key role in building a climate-neutral energy-intensive industry, as key technologies for defossilising the production of steel and basic chemicals depend on it. Thus, policy-making needs to support the creation of a market for green hydrogen and its use in industry. However, it is unclear how appropriate policies should be designed, and a number of challenges need to be addressed. Based on an analysis of the ongoing German debate on hydrogen policies, this paper analyses how policy-making for green hydrogen development may support industry defossilisation. For the assessment of policy instruments, a simplified multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is used with an innovative approach that derives criteria from specific challenges. Four challenges and seven relevant policy instruments are identified. The results of the MCA reveal the potential of each of the selected instruments to address the challenges. The paper furthermore outlines how instruments might be combined in a policy package that supports industry defossilisation, creates synergies and avoids trade-offs. The paper's impact may reach beyond the German case, as the challenges are not specific to the country. The results are relevant for policy-makers in other countries with energy-intensive industries aiming to set the course towards a hydrogen future.
The Digital Product Passport (DPP) is a concept of a policy instrument particularly pushed by policy circles to contribute to a circular economy. The preliminary design of the DPP is supposed to have product-related information compiled mainly by manufactures and, thus, to provide the basis for more circular products. Given the lack of scientific debate on the DPP, this study seeks to work out design options of the DPP and how these options might benefit stakeholders in a product's value chain. In so doing, we introduce the concept of the DPP and, then, describe the existing regime of regulated and voluntary product information tools focusing on the role of stakeholders. These initial results are reflected in an actor-centered analysis on potential advantages gained through the DPP. Data is generated through desk research and a stakeholder workshop. In particular, by having explored the role the DPP for different actors, we find substantial demand for further research on a variety of issues, for instance, on how to reduce red tape and increase incentives for manufacturers to deliver certain information and on how or through what data collection tool (e.g., database) relevant data can be compiled and how such data is provided to which stakeholder group. We call upon other researchers to close the research gaps explored in this paper also to provide better policy direction on the DPP.
In order to calculate the financial return of energy efficiency measures, a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) is a proven tool for investors. Generally, however, most CBAs for investors have a narrow focus, which is - simply speaking - on investment costs compared with energy cost savings over the life span of the investment. This only provides part of the full picture. Ideally, a comprehensive or extended CBA would take additional benefits as well as additional costs into account. The objective of this paper is to reflect upon integrating into a CBA two important cost components: transaction costs and energy efficiency services - and how they interact. Even though this concept has not been carried out to the knowledge of the authors, we even go a step further to try to apply this idea. In so doing, we carried out a meta-analysis on relevant literature and existing data and interviewed a limited number of energy experts with comprehensive experience in carrying out energy services. Even though data is hardly available, we succeeded in constructing three real-world cases and applied an extended CBA making use of information gathered on transaction costs and energy services costs. We were able to show that, despite these additional cost components, the energy efficiency measures are economically viable. Quantitative data was not available on how energy services reduce transaction costs; more information on this aspect could render our results even more positive. Even though empirical and conceptual research must intensify efforts to design an even more comprehensive CBA, these first-of-its-kind findings can counterargue those that believe energy efficiency is not worth it (in monetary terms) due to transaction costs or energy services costs. In fact, this is good news for energy efficiency and for those that seek to make use of our findings to argue in favor of taking up energy efficiency investments in businesses.