Refine
Year of Publication
- 2014 (263) (remove)
Document Type
- Report (61)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (56)
- Part of a Book (52)
- Contribution to Periodical (45)
- Working Paper (21)
- Conference Object (10)
- Doctoral Thesis (8)
- Book (6)
- Master Thesis (4)
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) is in crisis. More and more market participants are leaving the sector. In the light of this development, some argue that governments should step in as buyers of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs). Given the limited volumes of public funding, however, governments will have to prioritise some projects over others. This policy brief therefore analyses national purchase programmes and multilateral carbon funds in order to identify criteria public investors are applying in the selection of the projects they finance. The aim is to identify a vision of a high quality CDM project that be can be made use of when designing a possible support programme.
Using results-based finance for climate action : existing initiatives and the role of the CDM
(2014)
Results-based finance is receiving increasing attention, being considered as a potential key funding mode in climate finance. The Clean Development Mechanism has been cited to potentially contribute to this goal. Against this background, the policy brief outlines the rationale of the concept and analyses six climate change mitigation initiatives that build on the results-based finance approach. The analysis puts a special focus on the role of the CDM.
Energieszenarien können in der Diskussion zur Energiewende Orientierung bieten und Entscheidungen unterstützen. Fehlende Transparenz sowie die Vielzahl und Heterogenität der verfügbaren Studien erschweren es jedoch, diese angemessen zu interpretieren. Das vorliegende Diskussionspapier bietet Nutzern eine Hilfestellung und leistet einen Beitrag zur Entwicklung eines grundsätzlichen Analyse- und Interpretationsrahmens, der auch in anderen thematischen Bereichen angewendet werden kann.
Ziel dieser Studie ist es, einen aktuellen Überblick über den Stand der Recyclingwirtschaft in Deutschland zu geben. Der Fokus liegt dabei vor allem auf den Marktprozessen, die bereits heute ökonomische Anreize zur Schließung von Stoffkreisläufen geben, bzw. auf spezifischen Hemmnissen, die genau solchen Entwicklungen im Wege stehen.
Aufbauend auf der Analyse spezifischer Hemmnisse für einzelne Abfallfraktionen (rechtliche und institutionelle Hemmnisse, Marktmacht, Informationsdefizite etc.) leitet die Studie verschiedene Instrumente und handlungsorientierte Ansätze ab, die zu einer Verbesserung der Kreislaufführung beitragen könnten; dabei kann Deutschland auch von bestehenden Best-Practice-Ansätzen im Ausland profitieren. Dazu gehören unter anderem der verstärkte Einsatz ökonomischer Instrumente, Maßnahmen zur verstärkten Integration von Abfallwirtschaft und Produktionssektor, Urban Mining Konzepte, internationale Vereinbarungen zum Rohstoffrecycling sowie Green Tech Funds.
Among the factors that decelerate progress of CCS demonstration and deployment is the lack of public acceptance of local projects in Germany as well as in other countries. The study presented here aims to take the issue of public CCS perceptions further by empirically investigating the relevance of different specifications of the three main steps of the CCS chain, i.e. capture, transport and storage. An experimental approach is chosen and applied in an online survey with a representative sample from Germany with 1830 participants. With regard to possible CO2 sources we varied whether the CO2 of a specific setting is captured i) as part of an energy-intensive industry process (e.g. production of steel or cement), ii) from a power plant running on biomass, or iii) a coal-fired power plant. For transport, half of the settings described made reference to transport of CO2 via pipelines, the other half did not provide information about transport. With regard to storage the setting descriptions i) either explained that CO2 can be stored in saline aquifers, ii) can be used to enhance gas production from an emptying natural gas field or iii) can be stored in a depleted natural gas field. We find that overall the average of the ratings for perception of the settings fall into the neutral part of the answering scale. If the source of CO2 is a coal-fired power plant the setting is perceived less positively than if it includes biomass or industry. A significant interaction effect between transport and storage specifications is observed. This points out that storage in saline aquifers is perceived more negatively than a combination with enhanced gas recovery while storage in a depleted natural gas field is rated less positively if a pipeline is mentioned and more positively if no transport option is mentioned.
Technology cooperation : update on the technology mechanism and options for using carbon markets
(2014)
This policy brief provides a general overview on the setup of the UNFCCC's Technology Mechanism, exploring potential synergies between the mechanism and carbon market instruments such as the CDM.
There are two branches of the Technology Mechanism: the Technology Executive Committee (TEC), which is tasked to give political advice, and the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN), providing support and fostering the operationalization of technology transfer. Both institutions strongly focus on capacity building.
The CDM, instead, has contributed to technology transfer in practice. However, the transfer has largely focused on equipment and basic operational knowledge. The transfer of knowledge to adapt, advance and innovate has been limited so far.
Therefore, the two mechanisms could well complement each other. In theory, Programmes of Activities and Standardized Baselines under the CDM could be a means for developing country governments to strategically address financial barriers to technology transfer.