Refine
Year of Publication
- 2019 (214) (remove)
Document Type
- Peer-Reviewed Article (48)
- Contribution to Periodical (47)
- Report (39)
- Part of a Book (32)
- Working Paper (18)
- Conference Object (12)
- Doctoral Thesis (10)
- Book (5)
- Master Thesis (3)
Division
The transformation of urban mobility systems causes financial costs for the procurement and operation of innovative products and services and for the adaptation of existing infrastructure. While public budgets are limited, investments in infrastructure and transport services compete against other spending priorities, and private investors often are reluctant to invest into sustainable transport projects. Thus, cities need to seek additional funding and financing options and to develop business models to attract private sector investments in the development of the urban transport system. Moreover, financing schemes should cover the entire SUMP (Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning) cycle, starting from planning, to project implementation and procurement up to the operation and maintenance of services and infrastructures.
This requires the blending of different revenue sources, including:
project related revenue sources such as public transport fares and the lease of advertising space in buses;
the extension of the local tax base, for example through the introduction of road user charges and parking fees or the use of value capture mechanisms;
National, bilateral, and European grants;
Debt financing through loans and other instruments such as issuing green bonds. Finally, a prudential engagement of the private sector in infrastructure development and service provision can reduce the direct burden on public budgets while enhancing service quality. The applicability of specific financing options critically depends on the national legislative environment. Many of the instruments and case examples presented here may not be transferred to other Member States due to the different distribution of responsibilities and powers between the political levels in the Member States. This report, however, can inspire the search for potential funding and financing sources and is therefore aimed not only at local and regional authorities but also at decisionmakers at the national level. Still, whether a specific instrument can be used in a Member State needs to be assessed on a case-by-case base.
Die Digitalisierung ist längst gelebte Praxis. Jeden Tag werden Milliarden an "digitalen" Handlungen ausgeführt. Beispielsweise werden täglich 207 Mrd. E-Mails verschickt, 8,8 Mrd. YouTube-Videos angesehen und 36 Mio. Amazonkäufe getätigt. Dabei nimmt die Geschwindigkeit, mit der neue Anwendungen entwickelt und etabliert werden, kontinuierlich zu. Es stellt sich also die Frage, was im Energiesektor zu erwarten ist und wie die Entwicklung zielgerichtet genutzt werden kann.
Digitalization is a transformation process which has already affected many parts of industry and society and is expected to yet increase its transformative speed and impact. In the energy sector, many digital applications have already been implemented. However, a more drastic change is expected during the next decades. Good understanding of which digital applications are possible and what are the associated benefits as well as risks from the different perspectives of the impacted stakeholders is of high importance. On the one hand, it is the basis for a broad societal and political discussion about general targets and guidelines of digitalization. On the other hand, it is an important piece of information for companies in order to develop and sustainably implement digital applications. This article provides a structured overview of potential digital applications in the German energy (electricity) sector, including the associated benefits and the impacted stakeholders on the basis of a literature review. Furthermore, as an outlook, a methodology to holistically analyze digital applications is suggested. The intended purpose of the suggested methodology is to provide a complexity-reduced fact base as input for societal and political discussions and for the development of new digital products, services, or business models. While the methodology is outlined in this article, in a follow-up article the application of the methodology will be presented and the use of the approach reflected.
Im Energiesektor hat die Digitalisierung bereits viele Abläufe der Wertschöpfungskette verändert. Es besteht jedoch weiterhin erhebliches Potenzial zur Nutzung von digitalen Anwendungen. Insofern ist mit weiteren tiefgreifenden Veränderungen zu rechnen. Neben den zahlreichen Nutzen bestehen auch potenzielle negative Auswirkungen. Die so entstehenden Spannungsfelder müssen frühzeitig analysiert werden, um Lösungsoptionen für potenzielle Hindernisse zu erarbeiten um somit den größtmöglichen Nutzen der Digitalisierung erzielen zu können.
Nach jahrzehntelangen, erfolgreichen Reduktionen der CO2-Emissionen in der Industrie, ist der Trend in den letzten Jahren wieder rückläufig geworden: seit 2014 sind die Emissionen wieder angestiegen (UBA 2019). Um die deutschen Klimaziele zu erreichen ist es daher notwendig, die Anstrengungen zu verstärken und intensiver als in der Vergangenheit Innovationen für den Klimaschutz voranzutreiben: Neue Produkte und Geschäftsmodelle sowie neue Herstellungsverfahren zu entwickeln, mit denen sich Treibhausgasemissionen reduzieren lassen.
Um die deutschen Klimaziele für 2030 einzuhalten, werden hierfür gerade auch (inkrementelle) Effizienzsteigerungen nötig sein - diese werden jedoch nicht ausreichend sein. Innovationen müssen auch einen disruptiven Wandel von Strukturen und Geschäftsmodellen erwirken. Disruptive Innovationen und industrielle Konversionsprozesse bergen jedoch hohe Risiken für die etablierte Industrie. Hier stellt sich also die Frage, wie eine auf Klimaschutz ausgerichtete Innovationspolitik gestaltet werden muss, um einerseits die notwendigen CO2-Einsparungen zu ermöglichen und andererseits die Leistungfähigkeit der deutschen Industrie zu befördern?
Vor diesem Hintergrund widmet sich diese Studie zwei zentralen Fragestellungen: Wie laufen Klimaschutz-Innovationsprozesse ab? Wie können Klimaschutz-Innovationen befördert werden?
Basierend auf einer konzeptionellen Klassifizierung von Klimaschutz-Innovationen, wurden eine Reihe von existierenden Klimaschutz-Innovationen, gerade aus der energieintensiven Industrie analysiert. Vier Fallbeispiele aus verschiedenen Sektoren (Aluminiumherstellung und -verarbeitung, Herstellung neuer Kraftstoffe sowie der Verzinkung) und verschiedenen Innovationstypen werden in der Studie ausführlich beschrieben. Dabei zeigt sich, dass sich Unternehmen nicht nur an aktuellen Rahmenbedingungen orientieren, sondern Innovationen - sowohl inkrementeller wie auch radikaler Natur- im Bereich Klimaschutz auch unter der Annahme dynamischer Entwicklungen von sich verstärkenden Klimaschutzrahmenbedingungen vorantreiben. Darüber hinaus waren an allen untersuchten Fällen auch externe Promotoren unterstützend tätig. Daher wurden die möglichen Rollen von Klimaschutz-Promotoren mit unterschiedlichen regionalen und inhaltlichen Schwerpunkten gezielt analysiert.
Today more than 45 % of all energy-related CO2 emissions come from burning coal. Thus, reducing CO2 emissions from coal use is a necessity for reaching the targets of the Paris Agreement. This will not only pose challenges for coal consumers (restructuring of the energy system), but also for countries whose economy is strongly depending on the production of coal. This paper examines the role of coal in three countries, which are or were in recent years among the top coal exporters: Indonesia, Colombia and Vietnam. Understanding challenges and possible transition pathways in these countries will help to develop global strategies to reduce CO2 emissions from coal in the short to mid-term.
Climate researchers agree that anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions significantly contribute to climate change, and that radical measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to the impacts of no longer avoidable climate change are needed. The German Federal Government with its Climate Protection Plan 2050 reinforced its target to reduce Germany's greenhouse gas emissions by 80 to 95 percent compared with 1990. The achievement of these targets requires nothing less than a fundamental transformation of spatial planning.
In the paper a methodology to scientifically assess the likely impacts of possible combinations of policies or strategies to achieve the energy transition, i.e. to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of urban mobility and transport is proposed and demonstrated, using the Ruhr Area, the largest conurbation in Germany, as an example.
The results of the policies examined so far can be summarised as follows: Push measures as high energy prices, speed limits or reduction of the number of lanes of main roads are more effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions than pull measures as the promotion of cycling, walking, electric cars or public transport. Between policies or policy packages there can be positive or negative synergies, i.e. the impacts of measures can reinforce or weaken each other. The results show that even with ambitious policies the greenhouse gas emission targets of the national and state governments will not be achieved and that more radical policies are needed.