Im vergangenen Jahr waren die Zuwachszahlen im Bereich der Elektromobilität in Deutschland höher als jemals zuvor. Das enorme Wachstum ist vor allem der EU-Verordnung zur Flottenemissionsnorm zu verdanken. Die Elektromobilität hat damit einen wichtigen Schritt gemacht und gezeigt, dass sie das Potenzial hat, den Verbrennungsmotor bald zu verdrängen. Doch allein ein sehr hoher Marktanteil an Elektroautos genügt nicht, um die mittelfristigen deutschen Klimaschutzziele zu erreichen. Dies ist eine der zentralen Aussagen der Autoren des vorliegenden Impulspapiers. Sie empfehlen, dass die Europäische Union Herstellern weiterhin ambitionierte Zielvorgaben für emissionsarme Pkw machen sollte, damit schon im Jahr 2030 annähernd alle neu zugelassenen Pkw elektrisch angetrieben werden. Autos mit Hybridantrieb sind auf diesem Weg maximal eine wichtige Übergangstechnologie. Zentrale Voraussetzung ist zudem, dass die derzeitigen Ladevorgänge erleichtert werden, damit der Umstieg auf Fahrzeuge mit alternativem Antriebskonzept deutlich attraktiver wird.
This SUITS policy brief aims to highlight how the transformational process of the nine local authorities involved in SUITS into learning organizations made these cities far better prepared to cope with the challenges due to the pandemic than they would otherwise have been. Due to the higher levels of organizational resilience and the awareness of individuals' importance during such external crises, the nine local authorities were not just trying to react to the unforeseen challenges, but were able to act with a clear pathway and to use their experiences to facilitate their learning from recent years. Of course, the pandemic could not have been foreseen, but as SUITS local authorities are becoming learning organizations, they are enhancing their organizational capacity. In so doing, they have been learning a required resilience to reduce the "complexity and confusion - of what to do best" in the beginning of the crisis and to cope with the challenges. This advantage was of enormous relevance for the local authorities.
This Topic Guide aims to provide answers to the question: "How can transport products, services and works be delivered sustainably?". Public procurement accounts for about 19% of the European Union's GDP and thus is a powerful lever to support the transition of urban mobility. The purchasing power of municipalities and regions can create a critical demand for innovative and green goods, services and business models such as low emission vehicles or shared mobility solutions. Public procurement can increase their competitiveness and availability, and thus trigger the market penetration of innovative products and services. The Guide discusses the general concept of sustainable public procurement, the legislative environment in the EU and leads through the different stages of a procurement process for SUMP (Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning) measures in a stepwise approach. It also discusses different inherent principles of sustainable public procurement in the field of urban mobility such as life cycle costing and how these can be applied. In so doing, it points to relevant further guidance discussing specific issues and concepts.
The transformation of urban mobility systems causes financial costs for the procurement and operation of innovative products and services and for the adaptation of existing infrastructure. While public budgets are limited, investments in infrastructure and transport services compete against other spending priorities, and private investors often are reluctant to invest into sustainable transport projects. Thus, cities need to seek additional funding and financing options and to develop business models to attract private sector investments in the development of the urban transport system. Moreover, financing schemes should cover the entire SUMP (Sustainable Urban Mobility Planning) cycle, starting from planning, to project implementation and procurement up to the operation and maintenance of services and infrastructures.
This requires the blending of different revenue sources, including:
project related revenue sources such as public transport fares and the lease of advertising space in buses;
the extension of the local tax base, for example through the introduction of road user charges and parking fees or the use of value capture mechanisms;
National, bilateral, and European grants;
Debt financing through loans and other instruments such as issuing green bonds. Finally, a prudential engagement of the private sector in infrastructure development and service provision can reduce the direct burden on public budgets while enhancing service quality. The applicability of specific financing options critically depends on the national legislative environment. Many of the instruments and case examples presented here may not be transferred to other Member States due to the different distribution of responsibilities and powers between the political levels in the Member States. This report, however, can inspire the search for potential funding and financing sources and is therefore aimed not only at local and regional authorities but also at decisionmakers at the national level. Still, whether a specific instrument can be used in a Member State needs to be assessed on a case-by-case base.
In this policy paper we discuss policy instruments which can help to decarbonise passenger cars in the European Union. We elaborate to what extent these policy instruments are effective, technology-neutral, predictable, cost-effective and enforceable. Based on these criteria, we develop recommendations for the European Union and its Member States on (1) how to shape their policy frameworks in order to achieve existing climate change mitigation targets; (2) how to support car manufacturers in selling innovative and competitive products; and (3) how to encourage consumers in Europe to purchase appropriate vehicles.
We conclude that favourable policy instruments are used, but there is a strong need for adjustment and further development. The effectiveness of the current EU emission standard should be further increased by turning away from granting "super-credits" and introducing a size-based (instead of weight-based) credit system. Moreover, its overall ambition is questionable and the existing compliance mechanisms should be sharpened.
Fuel taxes are an effective means to push consumers to buy energy-efficient cars. However, a sharp increase may not have the desired effects. Instead, the Member States should harmonise their excise duties at the level of those Member States, which currently impose the highest taxes (Netherlands, Italy). This includes the abolition of any diesel tax bonus. An introduction and harmonisation of vehicle taxes (purchase and circulation) should be based on a vehicle's energy consumption. Additionally, reformation efforts should aim to change the taxation of company cars in a way that vehicle sizes are reduced over time.
Ambitious Member States may also want to introduce a sales quota for electric vehicles. Sales quotas are a very cost-effective policy instrument provided that the mandated technology will achieve a certain market share. This may be assumed for battery-electric vehicles. Further supportive instruments that should be considered are eco-labelling, public procurement and purchase incentives. However, the latter instrument's effectiveness is debatable and its implementation should therefore not be a Member State's priority.
This policy brief discusses the importance of SUMPs (Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans). We test the hypothesis that the development of an ambitious plan in itself does not necessarily translate into successful policies and measures and in actual sustainable urban mobility. We find that the existence of a SUMP correlates positively with a higher share of public transport but that the existence of a SUMP does not as yet have a significant impact on the overall share of non-motorised modes of transport.
Wie kann Wuppertal sich von einer Auto-Stadt zu einer Stadt des Umweltverbundes entwickeln? Der Wuppertaler Personenverkehr ist derzeit stark vom Autoverkehr geprägt, der die umweltfreundlichen Mobilitätsformen an den Rand drängt und ihre Entfaltung erschwert: Weit mehr als die Hälfte ihrer täglichen Wege fahren die Wuppertalerinnen und Wuppertaler mit dem Auto (58 Prozent) und nur rund ein Viertel mit Bussen, Bahnen und der Schwebebahn; dazu kommen noch 15 Prozent Wege, die zu Fuß gegangen werden und gerade mal 1,5 Prozent, die mit dem Rad gefahren werden.
Um diese Situation grundlegend zu ändern, reichen kleinere Korrekturen nicht aus - erforderlich ist ein grundlegender Kurswechsel. Im Zentrum steht dabei die Idee, den Menschen und den Unternehmen in Wuppertal eine Mobilität zu ermöglichen, die ihren Bedürfnissen entspricht und dabei zugleich ökologisch verträglich, sozial verpflichtet und gerecht sowie ökonomisch effizient ist; denn nur in dieser Verknüpfung werden Mobilität und Verkehr zukunftsfähig und stadtverträglich.
Langfristig sollten drei Viertel der Wege mit dem Umweltverbund aus Bussen, Bahnen und Schwebebahn sowie mit dem Rad und zu Fuß zurückgelegt werden, so dass der Anteil des Autoverkehrs auf ein Viertel der Wege mehr als halbiert wird.
Dadurch gewinnt Wuppertal und gewinnen die Wuppertalerinnen und Wuppertaler: mehr Ruhe, eine gesündere Luft, aktiven Klimaschutz, verbesserte Verkehrssicherheit, erweiterte umweltschonenende Mobilitätsmöglichkeiten und höhere Wohnumfeldqualität. Kurzum: eine lebenswerte Stadt.
Mobilität und Verkehr sollen also in Zukunft grundlegend anders aussehen - wie, das skizziert das Impulspapier des Wuppertal Instituts mit zehn Leitlinien für eine Verkehrswende in Wuppertal. Damit leistet das Wuppertal Institut einen Beitrag aus wissenschaftlicher Sicht zur Diskussion um eine zukunftsfähige Mobilität und eine zukunftsfähige Stadtentwicklung in seiner Heimatstadt Wuppertal.
Also in the global South, transport already significantly contributes to climate change and has high growth rates. Further rapid motorisation of countries in Asia and Latin America could counteract any climate efforts and aggravate problems of noxious emissions, noise and congestion.
This Paper aims at connecting the need for transport actions in developing countries to the international negotiations on a post-2012 climate change agreement. It outlines the decisions to be taken in Copenhagen and the preparations to adequately implement these decisions from 2013. Arguing, that a sustainable transport approach needs to set up comprehensive policy packages, the paper assesses the substance of current climate negotiations against the fit to sustainable transport. It concludes that the transport sector's importance should be highlighted and a significant contribution to mitigation efforts required.
Combining the two perspectives lead to several concrete suggestions: Existing elements of the carbon market should be improved (e.g. discounting), but an upscale of the carbon market would not be an appropriate solution. Due to a lack of additionality, offsetting industrialised countries' targets would finally undermine the overall success of the climate agreement. Instead, a mitigation fund should be established under the UNFCCC and financed by industrialised countries. This fund should explicitly enable developing countries to implement national sustainable development transport and mobility policies as well as local projects. While industrialized countries would set up target achievement plans, developing countries should outline low carbon development strategies, including a section on transport policy.