Refine
Year of Publication
- 2013 (127) (remove)
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (37)
- Report (36)
- Conference Object (17)
- Part of a Book (12)
- Working Paper (11)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (10)
- Book (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Division
- Energie-, Verkehrs- und Klimapolitik (127) (remove)
Kommunaler Klimaschutz
(2013)
Klimaschutz kommunal
(2013)
Soziale Tarife?
(2013)
Nachhaltige Energieversorgung spielt eine wichtige Rolle für den Klimaschutz. Dabei gehört die Steigerung der Energieeffizienz zu den zentralen Elementen einer Energiewende. Die vorliegende Fallstudie beschäftigt sich intensiv mit einem in der Policy Analyse bisher vernachlässigten Politikfeld: der Energieeffizienzpolitik.
In Deutschland wird viel Energie dazu gebraucht, um Gebäude zu heizen. Hier existieren große wirtschaftliche Effizienzpotentiale. Die EU sieht darin eine "Schlüsselrolle" und fordert von ihren Mitgliedstaaten mit der Richtlinie 2002/91/EG Rahmenbedingungen für energieeffizientere Gebäude. Mit Ansätzen der EU-Implementationsforschung und der Politikfeldanalyse untersucht die Arbeit den Implementationsprozess dieser Richtlinie zwischen 2003 und 2010 in Deutschland und beschreibt die formale und praktische Effektivität des Ergebnisses mithilfe neu entwickelter kontextspezifischer Kriterien. Eine detaillierte Prozess-Analyse identifiziert relevante Faktoren, die das politische Ergebnis beeinflusst haben.
Formal hat Deutschland die EU-Gebäude-Richtlinie größtenteils implementiert. Doch einige Anforderungen sind verspätet oder unbefriedigend praktisch implementiert worden. Eine wichtige Ursache der Verzögerung waren inhaltliche Differenzen zwischen den politischen Ressorts. An der öffentlichen Debatte beteiligten sich starke Befürworter beider Seiten, die den Prozess zusätzlich beeinflussten. Für den Vollzug der Energieeinsparverordnung (EnEV) sind die Bundesländer zuständig; ihre Kontrolle der energetischen Mindeststandards bei Bestandsgebäuden ist jedoch nicht befriedigend. Es gibt kaum Daten zu der Frage, ob neu gebaute oder sanierte Gebäude den gesetzlichen Anforderungen entsprechen. Ursachen für den mangelhaften Vollzug liegen im Zielkonflikt zwischen ambitionierter Klimaschutzpolitik auf der einen und Bürokratieabbau auf der anderen Seite. Hier war der Bundesrat, der behördliche Stichproben ablehnte, entscheidender Akteur. Die Verzögerungen und die ineffektive praktische Implementation der Richtlinie in Deutschland waren Resultat politischer Auseinandersetzungen. Es gab also keine institutionellen oder administrativen Probleme bei der Implementation im engeren Sinne, wie sie Implementationsdefizite in anderen Fällen erklären.
Abschließend werden konkrete Handlungsempfehlungen entwickelt, wie die Bundesregierung eine effektive Implementation der EU-Gebäude-Richtlinie gewährleisten (u. a. bessere formale Implementation des Energieausweises und der Heizungsinspektion sowie effektivere Durchsetzung der EnEV durch Stichprobenkontrollen) und erfolgreich gegen Widerstände von Interessengruppen durchsetzen kann (z. B. indem sie Pro-Effizienz-Interessenkoalitionen stärkt und neben dem Ordnungsrecht auch begleitende Instrumente weiterentwickelt, beispielsweise finanzielle Anreize sowie Information und Beratung, auch um mit dem gängigen Missverständnis aufzuräumen, die EnEV sei freiwillig).
Kosten des Klimawandels
(2013)
The Sino-German project "Low Carbon Future Cities" (LCFC) aims to develop a low carbon strategy for its Chinese pilot city Wuxi. The strategy primarily focuses on carbon mitigation, but also considers links with the issues of resource efficiency and adaption to climate change. This report written by Daniel Vallentin, Carmen Dienst and Chun Xia offers strategic examples of good practice and makes recommendations to Wuxi city government about the changes that key sectors can adopt in order to comply with its low carbon targets. The recommendations are based on scientific analyses which were undertaken earlier in the LCFC project.
Strategic policy packages to deliver energy efficiency in buildings : their international evidence
(2013)
The project "bigEE - Bridging the Information Gap on Energy Efficiency in Buildings" presents comprehensive information for energy efficiency in buildings and the related policy on the international internet-based knowledge platform bigee.net.
To develop the evidence-based information required for bigee.net, we addressed in a different and more systematic way than usual the question of how policy can support improved building energy efficiency most effectively: We combined (1) a theoretical, actor-centred analysis of market-inherent barriers and incentives for all actors in the supply and use chain of (energy-efficient) buildings to derive a recommended package combining the types of policies and measures the actors need to overcome all these barriers, with (2) empirical evidence on model examples of good practice policy packages to check if advanced countries have indeed used the combination of policies we derived from the actor-centred analysis.
In this way, we found that the recommendable policy package for new buildings is similar to the well-known one for appliances, but with the objective to mainstream nearly zero energy buildings. By contrast, the task for existing buildings is two-dimensional - increasing the depth of renovation first, to savings of 50 to 80%, and then the rate of energy-efficient renovation to 2% or more p.a. - and so the policy package needs more emphasis on individual advice, incentives, and financing. The paper presents the recommended packages as well as a comparison of existing national policy packages from California (USA), China, Denmark, Germany, and Tunisia and what we learned from it for effective packages and implementation.
What makes a good policy? : Guidance for assessing and implementing energy efficiency policies
(2013)
Which factors are crucial to successfully design and implement a "good practice" policy to increase the energy efficiency of buildings and appliances? This is one of the main challenges for the new web platform bigee.net that provides guidance on good practice policies.
In this paper we examine the question what "good practice" is by presenting a multi-criteria assessment scheme to analyse different policies worldwide.
The assessment scheme contains a set of criteria addressing key factors leading to the success of a policy as well as its outcomes: a good policy addresses all market players and barriers, avoids lost opportunities and lock-in effects, has ambitious and regularly updated energy efficiency levels, and spill-over effects. Other criteria are high energy savings and the calculated cost-effectiveness.
The assessment scheme provides a standardised data collection approach, which paves the way for both qualitative and quantitative evaluation. Furthermore, it can help policy-makers to transfer a successful policy.
The development of the scheme is based on a literature review of worldwide implemented policies and measures that promote energy-efficiency of buildings and appliances. Criteria were operationalized, including a ranking between 0 and 10. The ranking is a decisive factor whether the policy qualifies as good practice. To demonstrate the practicability of this scheme, the paper analyses a good practice example according to the assessment scheme: Energy-Efficient Refurbishment and Energy Efficient Construction programmes of the German public bank KfW.
The European electricity market is linked to a carbon market with a fixed cap that limits greenhouse gas emissions. At the same time, a number of energy efficiency policy instruments in the EU aim at reducing the electricity consumption. This article explores the interactions between the EU's carbon market on the one hand and instruments specifically targeted towards energy end-use efficiency on the other hand. Our theoretical analysis shows how electricity demand reduction triggered by energy efficiency policy instruments affects the emission trading scheme. Without adjustments of the fixed cap, decreasing electricity demand (relative to business-as-usual) reduces the carbon price without reducing total emissions. With lower carbon prices, costly low emission processes will be substituted by cheaper high emitting processes. Possible electricity and carbon price effects of electricity demand reduction scenarios under various carbon caps are quantified with a long-term electricity market simulation model. The results show that electricity efficiency policies allow for a significant reduction of the carbon cap. Compared to the 2005 emission level, 30% emission reductions can be achieved by 2020 within the emission trading scheme with similar or even lower costs for the industrial sector than were expected when the cap was initially set for a 21% emission reduction.
The Durban Climate Conference agreed on the creation of a new market-based mechanism under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and to consider the establishment of an overall framework for various mitigation approaches, including opportunities for using markets ("Framework"). The creation of such a Framework is therefore of high political significance, as it should ensure on the one hand that new market-based mechanisms contribute to global climate change mitigation and to achievement of targets, and on the other hand, that different market-based approaches can be integrated in a global carbon market. As yet, there is little clarity as to the roles and design of such a framework. This paper contributes to the debate by discussing and evaluating inter alia several design options, and explores how the various options could be implemented and how they interrelate. It concludes that a strong central oversight at the level of the UNFCCC is probably the only option that could reassure the vast majority of UNFCCC Parties that the environmental integrity of new market-based mechanisms is in fact ensured. This does, however, not exclude that some reasonable balance may be struck between centralization and flexibility.