Refine
Document Type
- Conference Object (4) (remove)
Division
- Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme (4) (remove)
Es besteht Einvernehmen, dass die hohe Komplexität des Wärmesystems das zentrale Hindernis für die Wärmewende darstellt: Der Wärmebedarf im Industrie- und Gebäudesektor ist durch unterschiedliche Temperatur- und Nachfrageprofile aber auch durch verschiedene Geschäftsmodelle gekennzeichnet. Im Gebäudebereich sind darüber hinaus auch die vielfältigen Erwartungen und Präferenzen der Millionen von Investoren und Nutzern entscheidend, die über rein techno-ökonomische Überlegungen hinausgehen. Diese Systemkomplexität erschwert die Entwicklung von Strategien im Wärmesektor und hemmt unter anderem auch die Möglichkeiten für Technologieentwickler das Marktpotenzial ihrer Innovationen einzuschätzen.
Fragen der Akzeptanz müssen folglich auf mehreren Ebenen Berücksichtigung finden, von Fragestellungen der Gesamtsystemanalyse bis hin zu einzelnen Umsetzungsprojekten. Entsprechend vielfältig ist die Forschung zur gesellschaftlichen Akzeptanz der Wärmwende im FVEE. Sie umfasst sowohl die Analyse von Nutzerpräferenzen bis hin zur gemeinsamen Gestaltung von Energiewendeprojekten, um die Gelingensbedingungen zu verbessern.
Allen Ansätzen ist gemein, dass die vorherrschende technisch-ökonomische Betrachtung der Wärmewende erweitert wird: Es wird nach Faktoren geforscht, welche die Nutzer*innen beeinflussen und es werden gezielt Bereiche untersucht, welche das Potenzial für zukünftige Akzeptanzkonflikte haben. Des Weiteren gibt es Ansätze, die Akzeptanzfragen bereits im Entwicklungsprozess von Innovationen zu berücksichtigen. Abschließend, in Bezug auf die konkrete Umsetzung von Wärmetransformationsprojekten, werden verschiedene Methoden des Co-Designs entwickelt, erforscht und getestet. Im Folgenden werden einzelne Projekte aus den verschiedenen Bereichen vorgestellt.
The unprecedented challenge of reaching carbon neutrality before mid-century and a large share of it within 2030 in order to keep under the 1.5 or 2 °C carbon budgets, requires broad and deep changes in production and consumption patterns which, together with a shift to renewables and reinforced efficiency, need to be addressed through energy sufficiency. However, inadequate representations and obstacles to characterising and identifying sufficiency potentials often lead to an underrepresentation of sufficiency in models, scenarios and policies.
One way to tackle this issue is to work on the development of sufficiency assumptions at a concrete level where various implications such as social consequences, environmental co-benefits, conditions for implementation can be discussed. This approach has been developed as the backbone of a collaborative project, gathering partners in 20 European countries at present, aiming for the integration of harmonised national scenarios into an ambitious net-zero European vision.
The approach combines a qualitative discussion on the role of energy sufficiency in a "systemic" merit order for global sustainability, and a quantitative discussion of the level of sufficiency to be set to contribute to meeting 100 % renewables supply and net-zero emissions goals by 2050 at the latest. The latter is based on the use of a dashboard, which serves as a common descriptive framework for all national scenario trajectories and their comparison, with a view to harmonising and strengthening them through an iterative process.
A set of key sufficiency-related indicators have been selected to be included in the dashboard, while various interrelated infrastructural, economic, environmental, social or legal factors or drivers have been identified and mapped. This paves the way for strengthening assumptions through the elaboration of "sufficiency corridors" defining a convergent, acceptable and sustainable level of energy services in Europe. The process will eventually inform the potential for sufficiency policies through a better identification of leverages, impacts and co-benefits.
On the pathway to climate neutrality, EU member states are obliged to submit national energy and climate plans (NECPs) with planned policies and measures for decarbonization until 2030 and long-term strategies (LTSs) for further decarbonization until 2050. We analysed the 27 NECPs and 15 LTSs submitted by October 2020 using an interrater method. This paper focuses on energy sufficiency policies and measures in the transport sector.
We found a total of 236 sufficiency policy measures with more than half of them (53 %) in the transport/mobility sector. Additionally, we found 41 measures that address two or more sectors (cross-sectoral measures). From the explicit sufficiency measures within the transport sector, 82 % aim at modal shift. A reduction of transport volumes is much less addressed. Countries plan to use mainly fiscal and economic instruments. Those are in many cases investments in infrastructure of low-carbon transport modes and taxation instruments. Plans on decarbonisation measures are also frequently mentioned. The majority of cross-sectoral measures are carbon taxes or tax reforms, also economic instruments.
On the one hand it is encouraging that Member States strongly emphasize the transport sector in their NECPs and LTSs - at least quantitatively and concerning sufficiency measures - because this sector has been the worst-performing in climate mitigation so far. On the other hand, the measures described seem not sufficient to reach ambitious climate targets, and we doubt that the presented set of policy instruments will get the transport sector on track to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions in the necessary extent.