Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (129) (remove)
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (45)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (43)
- Working Paper (26)
- Contribution to Periodical (9)
- Part of a Book (3)
- Book (2)
- Conference Object (1)
Division
- Stoffströme und Ressourcenmanagement (129) (remove)
This article proposes a policy framework for analysing corporate governance toward sustainable development. The aim is to set up a framework for analysing market evolution toward sustainability. In the first section, the paper briefly refers to recent theories about both market and government failures that express scepticism about the way that framework conditions for market actors are set. For this reason, multi-layered governance structures seem advantageous if new solutions are to be developed in policy areas concerned with long-term change and stepwise internalisation of externalities. The paper introduces the principle of regulated self-regulation. With regard to corporate actors| interests, it presents recent insights from theories about the knowledge-based firm, where the creation of new knowledge is based on the absorption of societal views. The result is greater scope for the endogenous internalisation of externalities, which leads to a variety of new and different corporate strategies. Because governance has to set incentives for quite a diverse set of actors in their daily operations, the paper finally discusses innovation-inducing regulation. In both areas, regulated self-regulation and innovation-inducing regulation, corporate and political governance co-evolve. The paper concludes that these co-evolutionary mechanisms may assume some of the stabilising and orientating functions previously exercised by framing activities of the state. In such a view, the government's main function is to facilitate learning processes, thus departing from the state's function as known from welfare economics.
This paper examines the connection between globalisation, with its growth in world trade links, and certain ecological effects especially concerning "North-South" relations. Although world trade in the mid-nineties was significantly uncoupled from growth trends in the world economy, so that since then it has increased nearly three times faster than the global GDP, certain indicators of energy use and CO2 emissions have not developed proportionately to world trade; globalisation evidently does not lead to a situation where pressures on the environment are increasing to the same extent worldwide. This de-linking may, however, result in the kind of shifts that we examine here with reference to the material trade flows of the European Union. It will be shown that, in the course of globalisation, the countries of the EU have increasingly shifted environmental burdens on to the countries of the South, especially in the form of ecological rucksacks of imported raw materials, while at the same time reducing the pressure on their own domestic environment by extracting fewer material resources. Furthermore, goods whose production places intensive pressure on the environment (industrial emissions into the atmosphere and water, heavy metal emissions, etc.) have been increasingly imported from newly industrializing or developing countries. The greater covering of material requirements from foreign resources has served not so much the EU's internal consumption as its own production of export goods; this shows that the EU has an increasing share in the resource requirement of other economies. The paper concludes that it is absolutely necessary to consider the international dimension in any strategy for more productive use of resources in industrial countries. In the long term, the EU's resource use should also be reduced in absolute terms. This will also be necessary in order to reduce the pressure on the environment due to imports and exports.
Die "Ökonomie der Aufmerksamkeit" hat zur Herausbildung spezifischer Märkte für Kommunikations-, Media- und Marketingdienstleistungen geführt. Ein dynamisch wachsender Markt ist der Markt für Live-Kommunikation, der in dieser Arbeit vertiefend untersucht wird. Hierbei werden drei Fragen diskutiert:
1. Was sind die treibenden Faktoren und Trends der Live-Kommunikation?
2. Nach welchen Maßstäben werden Events, insbesondere im Bereich der Unternehmenskommunikation, beauftragt?
3. Welche Chancen bestehen in diesem Markt, Events für Nachhaltigkeit als Marktsegment zu etablieren und zu stärken? Bei der Beantwortung dieser Fragen werden aktuelle Trendstudien ausgewertet, aber auch auf Untersuchungen und Fallstudien zurückgegriffen, die im Rahmen des Projektes "Eventkultur und Nachhaltigkeit" durchgeführt wurden.
Die Autoren kommen zu dem Ergebnis, dass die Markt- und Trendstudien eine wichtige Orientierungsfunktion für die Eventwirtschaft haben. Aus der Perspektive eines kulturökonomischen Ansatzes wird kritisiert, dass diese Orientierungsfunktion auf Marken und Marketingtechniken beschränkt ist und der Einfluss der gesellschaftlichen Wertbildung auf die Marketingpraxis ausgeblendet bleibt. Nachhaltige Ziele und Inhalte werden mit den Mitteln des Event-Marketings erst vereinzelt vermittelt. Aus diesen ersten Aktivitäten kann aber ein neuer Kommunikationsmarkt entstehen, wenn seitens der Nachhaltigkeitsakteure eine Verständigung über Kriterien und Anforderungen an dieses Marketinginstrument erfolgt sowie der Symbolebene in der Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation eine stärkere Beachtung geschenkt wird. Informationsbündelung und symbolisches Management sind wichtige Ansatzpunkte, um in der Marketingpraxis von Unternehmen, öffentlichen Einrichtungen, Verbänden, NGOs und von Kommunikations- und Eventagenturen eine nachhaltige Eventkultur zu verankern.
In this brochure, WISIONS focuses on the significance of innovative strategies in the field of sustainable tourism. WISIONS presents projects from Tanzania, Germany, Ecuador, Switzerland and Ghana that have been successfully implemented, with the intention of further promoting the particular approaches used by these projects. Using a key number of internationally accepted criteria, the main consideration for the selection of the projects was energy and resource efficiency, but social aspects such as the inclusion of local population were also of relevance. The assessment of the projects also included the consideration of regional factors acknowledging different needs and potentials.
Objective of this study is to support the development of a Thematic Strategy for Sustainable Use and Management of Resources through the provision of background information, in particular "an estimate of materials and waste streams in the Community, including imports and exports" (Article 8 a 6th EAP) using the method of material flow accounting. It further presents first ideas on how the resource use pattern of the EU can be assessed with regards to priority setting for possible policy measures.
By referring to the concept of Industrial Metabolism, resources are defined in a broad sense, embracing the source and sink function of the natural environment, i.e. the provision of raw materials and land, and the absorption of residual materials (waste and emissions). Environmental impacts are associated not only with the extraction, harvesting and catching of raw materials but also with the subsequent production, use and disposal of products and goods. It is the total of environmental impacts associated with the entire life cycle of raw materials which has to be considered.
Three generic "management rules" for the sustainable use and management of renewable and non-renewable natural resources are presented and discussed which have been formulated by several political institutions based on scientific literature:
1. The use of renewable resources should not exceed their renewal and/or regeneration rates.
2. The use of non-renewable resources should not exceed the rate at which substitutes are developed (should be limited to levels at which they can either be replaced by physically or functionally equivalent renewable resources or at which consumption can be offset by increasing the productivity of renewable or non-renewable resources).
3. Outputs of substances to the environment (pollution) should not exceed the assimilative capacity of environmental media ("absorption capacities").
Policies for Sustainable Use and economy-wide Management of natural Resources (SUMR) throughout the production and consumption system are faced with environmental and socio-economic requirements and regulatory constraints. Based on empirical findings of ongoing trends of resource use, decoupling from economic growth, and transregional problem shifting, the paper outlines a potentially sustainable biophysical basis for production and consumption in the EU. It discusses the main challenges for the major resource groups, describing the specific and the common tasks with regard to biomass, fossil fuels, metals, non-metallic minerals. Adopting a medical metaphor, it suggests that policies for SUMR should follow a dual approach reflecting the long-term need for a main cure of the socio-industrial metabolism in form of a "conditioning" towards a more mature, resource efficient, and renewables based constitution on the one hand, and a fine tuning of selected material flows (e.g. for optimized recycling and control of hazardous compounds) on the other hand. Both strategies are deemed complementary and necessary to reduce environmental impacts and increase the utility of material use. Action required is exemplified with regard to the three pillars of SUMR, i.e. improved orientation, information and incentives.
In der heutigen Spaß- und Konsumgesellschaft gewinnen Events als Marketingstrategie zunehmend an Bedeutung. Damit Unternehmen überhaupt noch Aufmerksamkeit erhalten, werden immer aufwändigere Events veranstaltet. Umweltaspekte spielen dabei eine eher untergeordnete Rolle. Doch das muss nicht so sein.
Das Wuppertal Paper von Rainer Lucas und Sandra Kolberg stellt sich der Frage, wie im Bereich der Messewirtschaft und insbesondere im Messebau die Materialeffizienz erhöht werden kann. Angesichts der kurzen Nutzungsdauer vieler Messestände und ihrer Ausstattungen konzentriert sich das Paper auf das Thema Produktdauerverlängerung. Die hiermit verbundenen Strategien werden zunächst auf ihre mögliche Anwendbarkeit in der Messewirtschaft überprüft. Danach wird es praktisch. Innovative Vorschläge und Konzepte für den Messestandbau, die Standausstattungen und neue Beratungs- und Informationsangebote werden vorgestellt. Hierbei wird deutlich: Bereits bei der Planung des Messestandes sollte auf die Recyclingfähigkeit der verwendeten Materialien geachtet werden. Das Produkt-Design bestimmt im Wesentlichen die Möglichkeiten einer Mehrfachnutzung und einer sinnvollen Nach- und Weiternutzung. Die Arbeit zeigt abschließend unter Beachtung der ökonomischen Rahmenbedingungen auf, welche Innovationspotenziale noch erschlossen werden können. Die vielen aufgeführten Beispiele belegen aber auch: in der Branche wird zunehmend erkannt, dass Materialeffizienz und Produktdauerverlängerung aufgrund der hohen Rohstoffpreise zu einem Wettbewerbsfaktor werden.
The paper reviews the current knowledge on the use of biomass for non-food purposes, critically discusses its environmental sustainability implications, and describes the needs for further research, thus enabling a more balanced policy approach. The life-cylce wide impacts of the use of biomass for energy and material purposes derived from either direct crop harvest or residuals indicate that biomass based substitutes have a different, not always superior environmental performance than comparable fossil based products. Cascading use, i.e. when biomass is used for material products first and the energy content is recovered from the end-of-life products, tends to provide a higher environmental benefit than primary use as fuel. Due to limited global land resources, non-food biomass may only substitute for a certain share of non-renewables. If the demand for non-food biomass, especially fuel crops and its derivates, continues to grow this will inevitably lead to an expansion of global arable land at the expense of natural ecosystems such as savannas and tropical rain forests. Whereas the current aspirations and incentives to increase the use of non-food biomass are intended to counteract climate change and environmental degradation, they are thus bound to a high risk of problem shifting and may even lead to a global deterioration of the environment. Although the "balanced approach" of the European Union's biomass strategy may be deemed a good principle, the concrete targets and implementation measures in the Union and countries like Germany should be revisited. Likewise, countries like Brazil and Indonesia may revisit their strategies to use their natural resources for export or domestic purposes. Further research is needed to optimize the use of biomass within and between regions.
The Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy and the UNEP/Wuppertal Institute Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP) set out to analyse Japanese dematerialisation and resource efficiency strategies within the 3R scope and searched for options of enhancing resource effi ciency strategies, commissioned by the German Federal Environment Agency. A further task of the project was to initiate a policy dialogue including stakeholders, academia, politics and Japanese and European environmental experts. The following paper summarises findings from the analyses, the results of the policy dialogues (Experts Workshop, 6 June 2007 and International Conference, 6 November 2007) and draws conclusions for a potential Japanese-European cooperation on the resource efficiency issue.
The study "A Green New Deal for Europe" consists of two basic elements: Firstly it aims to cope with the economic crisis through intensive measures in order to systematically stimulate the eco-industries, to create jobs and to boost economic recovery. Secondly it aims at establishing the foundation for a green modernisation of the European economy. The study examines existing EU strategies policies and programs concerning their suitability to implement the Green New Deal. It proposes exemplary measures in the field of energy, mobility and resource use. The study has been compiled by the Wuppertal Institute on behalf of the Greens/European Free Alliance (EFA) Group in the European Parliament.
The paper aims to shed light on the methodological challenges of GHG monitoring at local level and to give an overview on current practices. Questions addressed are as follows: How do the methodologies which underlie different GHG inventory tools differ? What are the critical variables explaining differences between inventories? Can different GHG inventory tools be compatible - and/or interoperable - and under which conditions? The first section discusses methodological challenges related to the formation of local GHG inventories. Rather than giving a comprehensive overview on methodological problems, this section mainly highlights some of the central methodological challenges posed by local GHG inventories. This overview identifies critical variables and clarifies concepts that are necessary for the understanding of the subsequent analysis. In section two, some of the most advanced GHG inventory tools are analysed and the most important differences between these tools are highlighted. The paper concludes that the methodologies are not consistent. Local GHG inventories can thus hardly be compared. The paper gives research and policy recommendations towards greater comparability and sketches the requirements of an international protocol on urban GHG inventories.
Vor dem Hintergrund des Klimawandels und der Verknappung fossiler Ressourcen haben nachwachsende Rohstoffe in den letzten Jahren an Bedeutung gewonnen. Insbesondere die Bioenergie hat durch staatliche Fördermaßnahmen viel Aufmerksamkeit erfahren. Mit der Ausweitung der energetischen Nutzung von Biomasse sollen Beiträge zum Klimaschutz durch die Vermeidung von Treibhausgasen geleistet, die Versorgungssicherheit soll durch Ersatz der knapper werdenden fossilen Ressourcen erhöht und der ländliche Raum gestärkt werden. Die selben Argumente lassen sich auch für die stoffliche Nutzung von Biomasse heranziehen. Auch wenn diese etwas aus dem Blickfeld der energiebezogenen Diskussion geraten ist, kann hier in den nächsten Jahren ein erhebliches Marktwachstum erwartet werden. Biomasse als erneuerbare Ressource kann in Land- und Forstwirtschaft aber nur begrenzt bereitgestellt werden. Dies gilt umso mehr, als bestimmte Nachhaltigkeits-Anforderungen eingehalten werden müssen. Der zu erwartenden Nachfragesteigerung für nachwachsende Rohstoffe (Nawaro) steht damit eine limitierte Verfügbarkeit entgegen. Aus dieser leitet sich die Forderung nach einer möglichst effizienten Verwertung ab. In diesem Zusammenhang fällt immer häufiger der Begriff der Kaskadennutzung von Nawaro als möglicher Lösungsansatz. Dieses Konzept kann im Wesentlichen als eine Hintereinanderschaltung von (mehrfacher) stofflicher und energetischer Nutzung desselben Rohstoffs gesehen werden und schafft so eine Verbindung von Material- und Energiesektor. Das Prinzip der Kaskadennutzung ist damit ein Ansatz zur Steigerung der Rohstoffeffizienz von nachwachsenden Rohstoffen und zur Optimierung der Flächennutzung. Das Ziel des vorliegenden Berichts ist es, die Option "Kaskadennutzung" strategisch, differenziert und ganzheitlich zu beleuchten. Im Rahmen der Projektarbeit sind daher Anforderungen an eine nachhaltige Kaskadennutzung von Nawaro abgeleitet und Schlussfolgerungen zu deren Ausgestaltung gezogen worden, um die Potenziale von Biomasse hochwertig und erfolgreich zu nutzen.
Dieser Beitrag stellt Ressourcenproduktivität als Kernstrategie vor. Schließlich kann sie nicht nur als Entschlackungskur fungieren, sondern auch als Innovationsmotor. Darüber hinaus wird ein Vorschlag zu einer internationalen Konvention für ein nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement gemacht, das vorhandene Verzerrungen reduzieren und zur Prävention von Ressourcenkonflikten beitragen soll. Erforderlich ist eine Sichtweise, bei der Material-, Energie-, Umwelt- und Technologieaspekte einerseits und internationale Entwicklungsaspekte andererseits integriert betrachtet werden. Schließlich geht es nicht um Rohstoffe als solche, sondern um ihre Funktion für menschliche Bedürfnisbefriedigung und Wohlstand. Nötig ist ein Paradigmenwechsel, in dem ein reines Angebotsdenken - welche Rohstoffmengen werden benötigt und wie können sie beschafft werden - zugunsten einer Systemperspektive überwunden wird.
This paper undertakes a step to explaining the international economics of resource productivity. It argues that natural resources are back on the agenda for four reasons: the demand on world markets continues to increase, the environmental constraints to using resources are relevant throughout their whole life cycle, the access to critical metals could become a barrier to the low carbon economy, and uneven patterns of use will probably become a source of resource conflicts. Thus, the issue is also of relevance for the transition to a low carbon economy. "Material Flow Analysis" is introduced as a tool to measure the use of natural resources within economies and internationally; such measurement methodology now is being harmonized under OECD auspices. For these reasons, the paper argues that resource productivity - that is the efficiency of using natural resources to produce goods and services in the economy - will become one of the key determinants of economic success and human well-being. An empirical chapter gives evidence on time series of resource productivity increases across a number of economies. Introducing the notion of "material flow innovation", the paper also discusses the innovation dynamics and issues of competitiveness. However, as the paper concludes, market barriers make a case for effective resource policies that should provide incentives for knowledge generation and get the prices right.
Economic performance of a country is generally being measured through GDP (Gross Domestic Product), a variable that has also become the de facto universal metric for "standards of living". However, GDP does not properly account for social and environmental costs and benefits. It is also difficult to achieve sustainable decision-making aiming at sustainable progress and well-being if welfare is being considered from a purely financial point of view. The study highlights the benefits and some of the shortcomings of GDP. It serves as a helpful and practicable instrument for monetary and fiscal policies. The real problem presumably is that GDP growth is too often confused with (sustainable) welfare growth in people's minds. While there certainly is a correlation between the two, this study shows that this is a highly conditional correlation, void of substantial causality for GDP levels observable in the European Union. In order to be able to assess people's well-being and general sustainable development in the sense of sustainability, an alternative instrument going beyond GDP is necessary. Using so called SWOT analyses, several alternative progress indicators have been assessed in the context of this study. On the one hand it was analysed how far ecological and social factors can be integrated in the GDP measurements. Thereby difficulties arose then trying to monetise these factors. As a further possibility indicators were analysed which are to replace GDP as a whole. The category supplementing GDP seems to be the most realistic and acceptable option for going beyond GDP. Within this approach, GDP is being complemented with additional environmental and/or social information. In order to make this kind of solution feasible the study claims the establishment of an overarching and transparent indicator system for improving economic decision-making in support of sustainable development.
The physical dimension of international trade. Part 1: Direct global flows between 1962 and 2005
(2010)
The physical dimension of international trade is attaining increased importance. This article describes a method to calculate complete physical trade flows for all countries which report their trade to the UN. The method is based on the UN Comtrade database and it was used to calculate world-wide physical trade flows for all reporting countries in nine selected years between 1962 and 2005. The results show increasing global trade with global direct material trade flows reaching about 10 billion tonnes in 2005, corresponding to a physical trade volume of about 20 billion tonnes (adding both total imports and total exports). The share from European countries is declining, mainly in favour of Asian countries. The dominant traded commodity in physical units was fossil fuels, mainly oil. Physical trade balances were used to identify the dominant resource suppliers and demanders. Australia was the principal resource supplier over the period with a diverse material export structure. It was followed by mainly oil-exporting countries with varying volumes. As regards to regions, Latin America, south-east Asian islands and central Asia were big resource exporters, mostly with increasing absolute amounts of net exports. The largest net importers were Japan, the United States and single European countries. Emerging countries like the "Asian Tigers" with major industrial productive sectors are growing net importers, some of them to an even higher degree than European countries. Altogether, with the major exception of Australia and Canada, industrialized countries are net importers and developing countries and transition countries are net exporters, but there are important differences within these groups.