De-industrialization, climate and demographic changes are only a few key words that indicate the challenge of urban development in many industrialized countries for the coming decades. A fundamental transformation of infrastructure and the built environment is expected to adjust to future needs. Numerous concepts of integrating efficiency and renewable energy sources into urban planning were elaborated in recent years. Energy sufficiency in the meaning of voluntary demand reduction of energy intensive goods and services is the third and mostly forgotten pillar of sustainable development. However, organizational and spatial measures are needed to support behavior modification. This paper presents results of a transdisciplinary research design with local stakeholders and scientific experts to develop an understanding of what energy sufficiency might contribute to sustainable urban development. Based on the Multi-Level-Perspective of the transition research approach, it analyzes how stakeholders and experts define energy sufficiency structures for the shrinking district of Vohwinkel (Germany). The paper also shows a compilation and evaluation of measures which facilitate energy sufficient behavior in the fields of space heating and passenger transport on a local level. The methodological concept comprises expert interviews, thought experiments with stakeholders to develop a vision of an "energy sufficient Vohwinkel 2050" as well as a stakeholder workshop to discuss the results. A shrinking population is seen as a chance to actively adapt the built environment to foster energy sufficiency.
The South African government started the development of a basic energy efficiency policy framework in 2005, including a voluntary label for refrigerators. This initial label was the intended precursor to a mandatory standards and labelling (S&L) programme, but the impacts achieved were only very limited. Based on this first experience, the South African Bureau of Standards (SABS) formed in 2008 a working group for the development of the new and more specific South African National Standard SANS 941. This standard identifies energy efficiency requirements, labelling and measurement methods as well as the maximum allowable standby power for a set of appliances as reliable basis for introducing a mandatory regulation. Nevertheless, due to many existing barriers, such as lack of funding and low priority assigned to the initiative, a very long period passed by between the S&L planning and final policy implementation. Finally, in November 2014, the South African government published mandatory performance standards coming into force in 2015/2016 for a first set of appliances consisting of refrigerators, washing machines, dryers, dishwashers, electric water heaters, ovens, A/C and heat pumps. To analyse the effectiveness of the new S&L programme and the potential influence of delays in the implementing process, the authors performed an immediate first-hand evaluation of the new policy.
As analytical reference base for available energy efficiency potentials, results from bottom-up scenario calculations will be presented exemplarily as case study for cold appliances covered by the S&L programme. A retrospective market study will show market trends before policy implementation and compare results with the new mandatory requirements. For the further policy analysis, a programme theory approach will be applied, in order to better understand why, how and under what conditions the policy works. Relationships with other energy efficiency policies and measures as well as positive or negative effects will be described. Furthermore, cause-impact relationships will be analysed to explain the functioning of the policy. Finally, success and failure factors will illustrate what needs to be done to achieve the desired energy efficiency targets. Henceforth, even though this study does not assess the direct transferability of the South African S&L programme to other regions, its findings could be relevant and useful for countries planning the implementation of similar policies.
Die Transformation des Energieversorgungssystems zu einer dekarbonisierten Energiebereitstellung bedingt ein koordiniertes Zusammenspiel der Sektoren Strom, Wärme und Verkehr. Dabei ist die Kopplung des Stromsektors mit dem Wärmesektor eine der entscheidenden Maßnahmen bei der Transformation. Die Aufnahme von Wind- und Sonnenenergie in das Netz kann durch genaue Einspeiseprognosen optimiert werden, die Kopplung zum Wärmesektor mittels Wärmepumpen und Power-to-Heat (Heizstab) ermöglicht die weitere Flexibilisierung der Nachfrageseite. Diese Interaktion wird durch intelligente Lösungen der Systemtechnik für das Energie- und Netzmanagement ermöglicht. Die Entwicklung von entsprechenden Anreizsystemen, Marktmechanismen und Geschäftsmodellen ist ebenfalls erforderlich, um diese Kopplung auch wirtschaftlich erfolgreich zu gestalten. Der Beitrag stellt das im Forschungsvorhaben "Interaktion EE-Strom, Wärme und Verkehr" erstellte 80-Prozent-Szenario für das Jahr 2050 vor und zeigt anhand von Beispielen zukünftige Anforderungen und Entwicklungen zu dieser Thematik auf.
Als Beitrag zu einer fundierten Diskussion über adäquate Politikinstrumente in der Wärmewende hat der FVEE mit seinen Mitgliedsinstituten im September 2015 ein Positionspapier erstellt: "Erneuerbare Energien im Wärmesektor - Aufgaben, Empfehlungen und Perspektiven". Dieses gibt einen umfassenden Überblick über die Herausforderungen und Handlungsoptionen im Wärmesektor und bietet damit eine wichtige Orientierung bei der Gestaltung der Energiewende.
Um die Energiewende erfolgreich umzusetzen, plädiert der FVEE für eine deutliche Stärkung des Wärmesektors in der Energiepolitik und eine entschiedene und langfristig angelegte Politik der Wärmewende, die den besonderen Anforderungen des Wärmesektors gerecht wird. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden ausgewählte Analyseergebnisse und Empfehlungen des Positionspapiers vorgestellt.
Die Wärmewende ist als Teil der Energiewende ein gesellschaftliches Großprojekt. Für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung benötigt die Wärmewende im Vergleich zur Stromwende vielfältigere und differenziertere Handlungsmechanismen. Es geht dabei nicht nur um den Ersatz fossiler Energieträger im Bereich der Wärmeversorgung durch regenerative Quellen, sondern vielmehr um einen systemischen Ansatz, der zudem eine stringente Forcierung von Energieeffizienzmaßnahmen, eine optimierte Verzahnung von Strom- und Wärmesystemen sowie eine zielgruppenspezifische Adressierung und Sensibilisierung von Akteursgruppen (hier: Kommunen, Privathaushalte, Industrie, GHD) erforderlich macht.
Im Rahmen der Energiewende haben sich erneuerbare Energien zur Stromerzeugung in Deutschland bereits etabliert. Um jedoch das volle Potenzial der Reduktion von fossilen Energien und Treibhausgasen (THG) auszuschöpfen, muss aus der Energiewende auch eine Wärmewende werden. Der Energieeinsatz für die Wärmebereitstellung der Industrie betrug im Jahr 2012 etwa 535 TWh (22 % des Endenergiebedarfs Deutschlands), hauptsächlich bereitgestellt durch Erdgas (48 %) und Steinkohle (17 %) 1. Damit wurden für die Wärmebereitstellung im Industriesektor rund 159 Mio. t CO2-äq emittiert, was 17 % der THG-Emissionen Deutschlands entspricht.
Aufgrund der Vielseitigkeit der einzelnen Branchen und Wärmeanwendungen im Industriesektor kann dieser Beitrag nur beispielhaft einzelne Komponenten für eine Wärmewende aufzeigen, die auch wiederum die Aktivitäten der einzelnen Autoren widerspiegeln. Ausgehend von einer nationalen Betrachtung und expliziten Modellierungsergebnissen für die energieintensive Industrie in NRW, werden einzelne Potenziale und Aktivitäten im Bereich der Wärmebereitstellung, -speicherung und -integration behandelt.
Wärmewende im Quartier
(2016)
A learning experience : integrating theory and practice for the implementation of INDCs ; thinkpiece
(2016)
A major cornerstone on the way to low-carbon sustainable development on a global scale will be a swift and effective implementation of all countries' INDCs submitted to the UNFCCC prior to Paris. However, doing so will require transforming development pathways away from currently pervasive carbon lock-ins. This can only be successful if countries take a systemic view on their development agendas, and link mitigation, adaptation and other developmental priorities together for a coherent overarching sustainable development strategy. The ownership for this process needs to be with the countries themselves as such strategies touch fundamentally upon national policy-making and implementation. At the same time, developing countries have access to bi- and multilateral financial and technical cooperation. To enable a systemic, country-led perspective, development cooperation needs to shift its paradigms away from currently prevalent project-level interventions.
A truly innovative and transformational shift with the objective of pursuing a low-carbon and climate resilient society needs to open up space for experimentation as new ways of doing things need to be put into practice. Experiments will not always be successful, but foster learning on a national as well as an international level on pitfalls and solutions in new approaches to low-carbon sustainable development. Not least, there needs to be a renewed focus on programmatic approaches that link various topical domains for a country-led process, and a critical look at development work that is "doomed to succeed".
Our article draws from systems theory, development studies and recent work on transitions studies and transformational change in the international domain. It links up different theoretical concepts with practical approaches in order to outline a future development agenda that will be owned by developing countries and supported non-invasively by bi- and multilateral development cooperation to foster low-carbon development pathways that are urgently needed to solve the climate crisis.
The international governance landscape on climate change mitigation is increasingly complex across multiple governance levels. Climate change mitigation initiatives by non-state stakeholders can play an important role in governing global climate change and contribute to avoiding unmanageable climate change. It has been argued that the UNFCCC could and should play a stronger role in "orchestrating" the efforts of these initiatives within the wider climate regime complex and thus inspire new and enhanced climate action. In fact, the Lima-Paris Action Agenda supporting cooperative climate action among state and non-state actors was supposed to be a major outcome of COP21.
There is little doubt that successful mitigation initiatives can create a momentum for climate protection. What is missing, is a systematic analysis of how this momentum can feed back into the UNFCCC negotiation process, inspiring also enhanced and more ambitious climate mitigation by states in future iterations of the cycle of nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement. This paper aims to close this gap: building on a structurational regime model, the article [1] develops a theory of change of how and through which structuration channels non-state initiatives can contribute to changing the politics of international climate policy; [2] traces existing UNFCCC processes and the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying entry points for a more direct feedback from non-state initiatives; and [3] derives recommendations on how and under which agenda items positive experiences can resonate within the UNFCCC negotiation process.