Refine
Year of Publication
- 2017 (47) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (13)
- Working Paper (13)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (9)
- Report (5)
- Conference Object (4)
- Contribution to Periodical (2)
- Book (1)
Division
- Nachhaltiges Produzieren und Konsumieren (47) (remove)
2015 verursachte jeder Deutsche 628 Kilogramm Siedlungsabfall. Damit liegt Deutschland für viele Abfallströme und insbesondere für Verpackungsabfälle deutlich über dem EU-Durchschnitt. Selbst wenn die Recyclingquoten hoch ausfallen, hat die Abfallvermeidung nicht nur eine ökologische Notwendigkeit. Auch aus ökonomischer Sicht muss sie zum Ausgangspunkt einer transformativen Innovationsagenda werden.
Background: Global targets for reducing resource use have been set by organizations such as the International Resource Panel and the European Commission. However, these targets exist only at the macro level, e.g., for individual countries. When conducting an environmental analysis at the micro level, resource use is often neglected as an indicator. No sum parameter indicating all abiotic and biotic raw materials has been considered for life cycle assessment, as yet. In fact, life cycle assessment databases even lack some of the specific input flows required to calculate all abiotic and biotic raw materials. In contrast, the cumulative energy demand, an input-based indicator assessing the use of energy resources, is commonly used, particularly when analyzing energy-intensive product systems.
Methods: In view of this, we analyze the environmental relevance of the sum parameter abiotic and biotic raw material demand, which we call the material footprint. First, we show how abiotic and biotic raw material demand can be implemented in the Ecoinvent life cycle assessment database. Employing the adapted database, the material footprint is calculated for 12 individual datasets of chosen materials and crops. The results are compared to those of the cumulated energy demand and four selected impact categories: climate change, ozone depletion, acidification, and terrestrial eutrophication.
Results: The material footprint is generally high in the case of extracted metals and other materials where extraction is associated with a large amount of overburden. This fact can lead to different conclusions being drawn compared to common impact categories or the cumulative energy demand. However, the results show that both the range between the impacts of the different materials and the trends can be similar.
Conclusions: The material footprint is very easy to apply and calculate. It can be implemented in life cycle assessment databases with a few adaptions. Furthermore, an initial comparison with common impact indicators suggests that the material footprint can be used as an input-based indicator to evaluate the environmental burden, without the uncertainty associated with the assessment of emission-based impacts.
Mit der Nachhaltigkeitsanleihe NRW erschließt das Land das international wachsende Segment des nachhaltigen Investments für die Kreditfinanzierung des Landeshaushalts. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie ist es, die Bewertung positiver Nachhaltigkeitseffekte für die in 2016 emittierte Nachhaltigkeitsanleihe NRW zu erproben und Handlungsempfehlungen zur Bewertung zukünftiger Nachhaltigkeitsanleihen zu entwickeln. Für eine umfassende Nachhaltigkeitsanalyse ist aufgrund der Vielschichtigkeit der finanzierten Projekte und fehlender Standards zur Bewertung sozialer Kriterien eine umfangreiche Untersuchung erforderlich, wodurch sie für eine regelmäßige und standardisierte Wirkungsanalyse zukünftiger Anleihen nicht in Frage kommt. Stattdessen verfolgt die vorliegende Studie einen pragmatischen Ansatz zur Bewertung. Der Fokus liegt auf der Evaluation der potenziellen Treibhausgas-Minderung (THG-Minderung), da deren Bewertung sich derzeit als Standard für eine Wirkungsanalyse solcher Anleihen abzeichnet. Darüber hinaus werden die nächsten Schritte für eine Weiterentwicklung der Methodik und des Indikatorensets im Rahmen zukünftiger Wirkungsanalysen aufgezeigt.
Energy efficiency improvements have numerous benefits/impacts additional to energy and greenhouse gas savings, as has been shown and analysed e.g. in the 2014 IEA Report on "Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency". This paper presents the Horizon 2020-project COMBI ("Calculating and Operationalising the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency in Europe"), aiming at calculating the energy and non-energy impacts that a realisation of the EU energy efficiency potential would have in 2030. The project covers the most relevant technical energy efficiency improvement actions and estimates impacts of reduced air pollution (and its effects on human health, eco-systems/crops, buildings), improved social welfare (incl. disposable income, comfort, health, productivity), saved biotic and abiotic resources, and energy system, energy security, and the macroeconomy (employment, economic growth and public budget). This paper explains how the COMBI energy savings potential in the EU 2030 is being modelled and how multiple impacts are assessed. We outline main challenges with the quantification (choice of baseline scenario, additionality of savings and impacts, context dependency and distributional issues) as well as with the aggregation of impacts (e.g. interactions and overlaps) and how the project deals with them. As research is still ongoing, this paper only gives a first impression of the order of magnitude for additional multiple impacts of energy efficiency improvements may have in Europe, where this is available to date. The paper is intended to stimulate discussion and receive feedback from the academic community on quantification approaches followed by the project.
Sharing : eine innovative, soziale Praktik für einen ressourcenschonenden, nachhaltigeren Konsum?
(2017)
Innerhalb des Projektes NsB-Ress untersuchten Forscherinnen und Forscher eine Konsumform hinsichtlich seiner Ressourceneffizienz- und Diffusionspotenziale, die eine ressourcenschonendere und -effizientere Nutzung natürlicher Ressourcen verspricht. Das Credo: nutzen statt besitzen. Zum Zweck dieser Untersuchung machten sie eine Bestandsaufnahme der aktuell und zukünftig marktrelevanten NsB-Angebote, deren Ressourceneinsparpotenziale im Nachgang analysiert wurden. Durch diese Schritte sollen Erkenntnisse und Aussagen über den möglichen Ressourcenverbrauch und Reboundeffekte möglich werden. Weiterhin wurden Erfolgsfaktoren für die Diffusion von Angeboten identifiziert sowie Einsparpotenziale erschlossen, um auszuloten, wie NsB-Angebote frühzeitig ressourcenleicht gestaltet werden können. Am Ende des Projektes sollen Handlungsempfehlungen für relevante Akteure - also Politik, Wirtschaft sowie Verbraucherinnen und Verbraucher - generiert werden.
Das Projektteam zeichnet in der vorliegenden Broschüre ein differenziertes Bild, das sowohl ökologisch als auch sozial wünschenswerte und förderungswürdige NsB-Angebote aufzeigt, aber auch diejenigen benennt, die mit Reboundeffekten verbunden sein können und deshalb einer politischen Rahmensetzung bedürfen.
What leads to lunch : how social practices impact (non-)sustainable food consumption / eating habits
(2017)
The field of nutrition will face numerous challenges in coming decades; these arise from global consumption patterns and lead to a high use of resources. Actors in the catering sector face difficulties in promoting their solutions for a more sustainable situation in their field, one of them being the lack of acceptance from consumers. We must ask the question of how to influence consumer behavior and bring forth a transition towards more sustainable food consumption. This paper presents results of a qualitative assessment of eating practices. A group of ten consumers participated in problem-centered interviews and provided data on their eating-out behavior over the course of two weeks. Using the theoretical approach of practice theory, the data gathered in this study were used to form an understanding of the practice of eating out with a focus on the daily routines that influence consumer choices. The results indicate that the practice of eating out is highly dependent on external factors. Busy lifestyles, mobility routines and a perceived lack of time prompt the decision to eat out. Consumers consciously do so to save time and effort and to streamline their schedules. Mobility seems to be an important driver for eating out. Participants try to limit the ways they undertake eating out yet often stop for a meal in-between appointments spontaneously. Findings suggest that nutrition knowledge and sustainable mindsets have little influence on the eating decisions away from home: Participants show a high level of distrust towards quality claims and put their health concerns aside eating out. We can conclude that the act of eating out is strongly influenced by daily routines and those practices that precede or succeed it. Changes in work and mobility patterns are very likely to have an impact on the way consumers eat away from home.