Refine
Year of Publication
- 2012 (271) (remove)
Document Type
- Report (58)
- Contribution to Periodical (57)
- Part of a Book (53)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (39)
- Working Paper (24)
- Conference Object (22)
- Doctoral Thesis (6)
- Book (5)
- Master Thesis (5)
- Lecture (1)
Mit den Ereignissen und Entscheidungen des Jahres 2011 wurde endgültig der Wandel im Umbau unseres Energiesystems eingeleitet. Welche Perspektiven ergeben sich daraus für die Unternehmen des Energiesektors? Namhafte Autoren aus Wissenschaft und Praxis beschreiben in diesem Buch, wie der Wandel in Richtung auf mehr Nachhaltigkeit gelingen kann. Eine wichtige Rolle spielen dabei die sogenannten Smart-Technologien. Die Herausforderung für Versorger und Technikanbieter liegt darin, erfolgreich neue Geschäftsmodelle zu realisieren. Die Autoren arbeiten in zukunftsweisenden Projekten in diesem Themenfeld und berichten über ihre Fortschritte beim Umbau der Energiebranche.
Zur Transformation des Energiesektors : ein Blick aus der Perspektive der Transition-Forschung
(2012)
Die Entwicklung zu einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaftsweise wird insbesondere durch Veränderungsprozesse in einzelnen Schlüsselbranchen vorangetrieben. Zu einer solchen Schlüsselbranche gehört der Energiesektor. Ein nachhaltiger Branchenwandel basiert dabei auf einem differenzierten Zusammenspiel von technologischen Entwicklungen, von politischer Rahmensetzung, von allgemeinen Umfeldveränderungen und von der Entwicklung neuer Geschäftsstrategien, die diese Elemente aufgreifen.
Die nachhaltige Gestaltung der zukünftigen Energieversorgung stellt heute große Herausforderungen. Diese gehen weit über die häufig im Mittelpunkt stehende Frage des Klimaschutzes hinaus und umfassen Aspekte der Versorgungssicherheit, der Wirtschafts- und Sozialverträglichkeit ebenso wie Ansprüche nach Risikominimierung, geringer Systemverletzlichkeit und Anpassungsfähigkeit. Bei der Gestaltung entsprechender Politiken und bei der Umsetzung von Maßnahmen gilt es diesen komplexen Anforderungskanon im Hinterkopf zu haben, Synergieeffekte anzustreben und trade off's zwischen verschiedenen Zielen zu vermeiden.
Consumption of natural resources should not exceed sustainable levels. The increasing use of biofuels and to some extent biomaterials, on top of rising food and feed demands, is causing countries to use a growing amount of global land, which may lead to land use conflicts and the expansion of cropland and intensive cultivation at the expense of natural ecosystems. Selective product certification cannot control the land use change triggered by growing overall biomass consumption. We propose a comprehensive approach to account for the global land use of countries for their domestic consumption, and assess this level with regard to globally acceptable levels of resource use, based on the concept of safe operating space. It is shown that the European Union currently uses one-third more cropland than globally available on a per capita basis and that with constant consumption levels it would exceed its fair share of acceptable resource use in 2030. As the use of global forests to meet renewable energy targets is becoming a concern, an approach to account for sustainable levels of timber flows is also proposed, based on the use of net annual increment, exemplified with preliminary data for Switzerland. Altogether, our approach would integrate the concept of sustainable consumption into national resource management plans; offering a conceptual basis and concrete reference values for informed policy making and urging countries to monitor and adjust their levels of resource consumption in a comprehensive way, respectful of the limits of sustainable supply.
The study presents the results of an integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the power plant sector in Germany, with special emphasis on the competition with renewable energy technologies. Assessment dimensions comprise technical, economic and environmental aspects, long-term scenario analysis, the role of stakeholders and public acceptance and regulatory issues. The results lead to the overall conclusion that there might not necessarily be a need to focus additionally on CCS in the power plant sector. Even in case of ambitious climate protection targets, current energy policy priorities (expansion of renewable energies and combined heat and power plants as well as enhanced energy productivity) result in a limited demand for CCS. In case that the large energy saving potential aimed for can only partly be implemented, the rising gap in CO2 reduction could only be closed by setting up a CCS-maximum strategy. In this case, up to 22% (41 GW) of the totally installed load in 2050 could be based on CCS. Assuming a more realistic scenario variant applying CCS to only 20 GW or lower would not be sufficient to reach the envisaged climate targets in the electricity sector. Furthermore, the growing public opposition against CO2 storage projects appears as a key barrier, supplemented by major uncertainties concerning the estimation of storage potentials, the long-term cost development as well as the environmental burdens which abound when applying a life-cycle approach. However, recently, alternative applications are being increasingly considered–that is the capture of CO2 at industrial point sources and biomass based energy production (electricity, heat and fuels) where assessment studies for exploring the potentials, limits and requirements for commercial use are missing so far. Globally, CCS at power plants might be an important climate protection technology: coal-consuming countries such as China and India are increasingly moving centre stage into the debate. Here, similar investigations on the development and the integration of both, CCS and renewable energies, into the individual energy system structures of such countries would be reasonable.
Der Verlust wilder und landwirtschaftlicher Sorten- und Artenvielfalt schreitet immer weiter voran. Demgegenüber nehmen Biopatente stark zu, diese sind mitverantwortlich für den Sortenverlust, globale Ungerechtigkeiten, die Einschränkung der Wissensnutzung, etc. Viele internationale Abkommen betreffen den Umgang mit biologischer Vielfalt - doch die Frage nach Alternativen zum Eigentum an genetischen Ressourcen wird selten gestellt. Dabei gibt es genügend Ansätze, der Inwertsetzung der genetischen Ressourcen etwas entgegenzusetzen. In seiner Studie beschäftigt sich Gregor Kaiser mit diesen Alternativen, beleuchtet die Felder der Auseinandersetzung und stellt die Akteure vor. Er entwirft das Bild einer zukünftigen Züchtung und Biodiversitätsgestaltung, in der sich die Gesellschaften gemein machen mit ihrem Umfeld und sich einmischen in politische Prozesse.
The article estimates the natural resource consumption due to nutrition from the supply and demand sides. Using the MIPS (Material Input per Service Unit) methodology, we analyzed the use of natural resources along the supply chains of three Italian foodstuffs: wheat, rice and orange-based products. These figures were then applied for evaluating the sustainability of diets in 13 European countries. The results outline which phases in food production are more natural resource demanding than others. We also observed different levels of sustainability in the European diets and the effect of different foodstuffs in the materials, water and air consumption.
CDM-Reformen 2012
(2012)
Material flows induced by national economies can be regarded as indirect pressure indicators for environmental degradation. Economy-wide material flow analysis and indicators have been designed to monitor material and energy flows at the macroeconomic level and to provide indicators, which could contribute to management of resourceuse and output emission flows from both economic, environmental and broader sustainability points of view. These indicators can serve various purposes including monitoring the material basis of national economies and related environmental pressures, assessment of the material and resource productivity and monitoring the implications of trade and globalisation.
The main part of this paper compares the material and resourceuse of the Czech Republic, Germany and the EU-15 by means of DMI and TMR indicators over the period of 1991–2004 (1991–2000 for EU-15). At the aggregate level both indicators in all three economies do not show any clear decreasing or increasing trends over the period considered. This means that environmental pressure related to use of materials for production and consumption purposes remains rather stable. All the economies however, recorded an increase in the efficiency of transforming the material/resource inputs into economic output. The analysis further revealed that most of the dynamics of DMI and TMR in the Czech Republic tended towards a higher similarity with Germany and the EU-15. In the future, further decreases in DMI as well as in TMR of fossils fuels might be expected in the Czech Republic, which could be counteracted by increase in DMI and TMR of metal ores/metal resources and non-metallic minerals/non-metallic resources. The future development of total DMI, TMR and material/resource intensity in both the Czech Republic and Germany will depend on further shifts to less material intensive industries and services and on increasing material efficiency in production and consumption of particular products. This is not only a technological, but also a social challenge, as there are barriers in current mode of governance and in shaping of current economic and social systems to do so.
The Energy End-use Efficiency and Energy Services Directive (ESD) of the European Union requires the member states to define and attain an overall target of at least 9 % annual energy savings between 2008 and 2016. Even if this target is indicative, this is the first international framework mandating countries to report on their energy savings results and prove achievement of their targets. The directive thus also required the development of harmonised calculation methods that can be used by member states for this proof and reporting. Existing literature covers most of the usual issues related to energy savings evaluation, but mostly looking at single, given energy efficiency programmes or policies. The evaluation objective for the ESD implementation is different, as it aims at accounting for the whole energy savings achieved in a country. Moreover, one of the main difficulties is the diversity in history and experience on this topic among the member states. In this context, the European project EMEEES has worked out an integrated system of bottom-up and top-down methods for the measurement of energy savings. The paper presents the overview of its final results. The proposals, inter alia, include 20 bottom-up and 14 top-down case applications of general evaluation methods. They enable more than 90 % of the potential energy savings to be measured and reported. They were used as a starting point by the European Commission to develop the methods recently recommended to the member states. Furthermore, the paper briefly discusses the importance of the quantity to be measured-all or additional energy savings - and the effect of measures implemented before the entering into force of the ESD ("early action"), and what this meant for the methods to be developed. It compares the main elements of calculation needed to ensure consistent results between bottom-up and top-down methods at the overall national level. Finally, general conclusions are drawn about what could be the next steps in developing an evaluation system that enables a high degree of comparability of results between different countries.