Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (26)
- Part of a Book (11)
- Working Paper (9)
- Report (8)
- Book (6)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (5)
The war in Ukraine is changing the political landscape at breakneck speed. How should politics and society react to high energy prices and a precarious dependence on fossil fuels imports? Can modern societies get by with much less energy? Energy sufficiency can play an important role in answering these questions. The contributions in this Special topic explore sufficiency as an interdisciplinary research topic for energy modeling, scenarios, and policy.
Rethink rather than rebound : a sufficiency revolution must precede the efficiency revolution
(2014)
Economy of sufficiency : essays on wealth in diversity, enjoyable limits and creating commons
(2013)
Another summit of change, known as Rio+20, has passed in summer 2012, nourishing the rumours of a green economy. Building up a green economy seems to be the all over recipe for different crises of capitalism, among them climate change and resource scarcity. Yet efficiency and consistency, as their main strategies, do not suffice to reach sustainable levels, as they cause rebound effects and keep stimulating economy growth. Obviously, there are limits to green growth, too. Can we conceive an economy, and respective economic institutions, that serve human needs and wealth without a built-in necessity to grow? What kind of political, mental, and individual changes does a sufficiency economy require? And what are perspectives and policies to actually start implementing it?
Just before Rio +20 the symposium "Economy of Sufficiency", devoted to Wolfgang Sachs on the occasion of his 65th birthday in 2011, examined these questions in three dimensions. Accordingly this selection of contributions to the symposium follows the chapters "Wealth in diversity" (Ashok Khosla, Marianne Gronemeyer, Vandana Shiva), "Enjoyable limits" (Richard B. Norgaard, Tim Jackson) and "Creating commons" (Ezio Manzini, Silke Helfrich).
The essays indicate the historical development of the ideas on a sufficiency economy. Wandering through discourses of sustainable development for several decades, the authors map the range of perspectives, practices as well as barriers and bridge them between cultures, agencies and schools.
Eine Steigerung der Energieproduktivität, um Energie möglichst sparsam im Wirtschaftsprozess einzusetzen, ist ein wichtiger Beitrag zur Nachhaltigkeit. Dieser Text geht indessen der Frage nach, inwiefern Produktivitätssteigerungen "unerwünschte Nebenwirkungen" in Form einer Mehrnachfrage nach Energie nach sich ziehen können, die als so genannter Rebound-Effekt dem Ziel der Energieeinsparung zuwiderlaufen. Der Text zeigt 13 mögliche Rebound-Effekte auf, umreißt ihr quantitatives Ausmaß und beschreibt die Schwierigkeiten, sie mit politischen Maßnahmen zu begrenzen.
Im Ergebnis erscheint es dringend erforderlich, zukünftig Rebound-Effekte in wissenschaftlichen Szenarien und im politischen Handeln zu berücksichtigen. Denn aufgrund der Vielzahl und Verschiedenartigkeit möglicher Rebound-Effekte und der Einschätzung des Autors, dass die Summe dieser Rebound-Effekte auch langfristig mindestens die Hälfte der Einsparpotenziale von Effizienzmaßnahmen aufzehren wird, werden Nachhaltigkeitsziele wie die Verminderung der Treibhausgase um ca. 80-90 Prozent in den Industrieländern bis zum Jahr 2050 durch Effizenz- und Konsistenzstrategien alleine unerreichbar. Erst wenn das Volkseinkommen aufhört stetig weiter zu wachsen, können Effizienz- und Konsistenzstrategien einen uneingeschränkt positiven Beitrag zur Nachhaltigkeit leisten und ihre technisch möglichen Einsparpotenziale voll realisieren.
Towards an effective and equitable climate change agreement : a Wuppertal proposal for Copenhagen
(2009)
This paper presents comprehensive proposals for the post-2012 climate regime: the scale of the challenge, emission targets for industrialised countries, increased actions by Southern countries, financing, technology, adaptation and deforestation. The proposals are based on ongoing research by the Wuppertal Institute.
Pit stop Poznan : an analysis of negotiations on the Bali action plan at the stopover to Copenhagen
(2009)
This paper analyzes the international climate negotiations that took place at the 14th Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (COP) and the 4th Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP) held in Poznan, December 1–12, 2008. It works out the main issues at stake in the negotiations, contrasts divergences in interests amongst negotiating Parties, and summarizes the main results achieved in Poznan. Furthermore, it contextualizes the Poznan negotiations within the broader political and economic context, which has shaped climate policy making throughout 2008. The paper ends with an outlook on the tasks ahead in 2009, until the next COP/CMP in December 2009 in Copenhagen.
Fairhandeln im Treibhaus
(2008)
In less than ten years, emissions trading has forged ahead as a climate policy instrument - from the setting of the agenda through the formulation of policy to the stage of implementation. This has happened at several policy levels: on the one hand, as international emissions trading in the framework of the Kyoto Protocol, and on the other hand as emissions trading for energy-intensive companies within the European Union. Not only because of the speed of the process, but also because emissions trading is generally being perceived as an effective means to avoid greenhouse gas emissions, ist introduction is mostly regarded as a success story. This claim is here critically examined with the help of a number of theoretical hypotheses borrowed from the field of multilevel governance research. The theoretical discussion is woven into a detailed descriptive-analytic account of the introduction of emissions trading, bringing out the most important players, conflicts and milestones in the process. What were the consequences of this rapid introduction for the interdependence of players and institutions in the multi-level policy system? To what extent was it accompanied with a transfer of authority from national governments to supranational or international institutions? Can we speak here of a further loss of sovereignty by national states in the age of globalisation? And has the introduction of emissions trading, as a new generation of climate policy instruments, brought about institutional changes in negotiation patternsand decision-making processes? This set of questions is being derived from the concept of multi-level governance which serves as the framework of analysis of this paper and is then being used to analyse fifteen theses in order to explain the complexity of the introduction of emissions trading and highlight problems and deficits in the negotiating processes. The aim of the paper is to give a answer to the question of whether the meteoric rise of the policy instrument may be described as a "success story".
Praxisschock? - Die Genese der EU-Emissionshandelsrichtlinie und ihre klimapolitische Bedeutung
(2008)
Klimawandel und globale Gerechtigkeit : fair handeln zwischen Klimaschutz und Entwicklungsrechten
(2008)
Klimawandel, Hungerkrise, Rohstoffknappheit und Naturzerstörung stehen auf der internationalen Tagesordnung. Dennoch geht in der Politik, in der Wirtschaft und im Alltag Vieles weiter wie bisher: Für Flughäfen werden neue Start- und Landebahnen geplant, neue Kohlekraftwerke sollen gebaut werden und Heizpilze sprießen aus dem Boden. Im Zweifelsfalle sind der Politik die Ankurbelung der Nachfrage und die Interessen der Autoindustrie wichtiger als der Klimaschutz. Und selbstverständlich sollen Lebensmittel, T-Shirt und Turnschuhe wenig kosten. Armut in Entwicklungsländern hin, Umweltverschmutzung in Schwellenländern her. Die Notwendigkeit einer nachhaltigen Politik wird vielfach beschworen - und ungebrochen dem Wirtschaftswachstum Vorrang eingeräumt.
Der Klimawandel ruft nach nichts weniger als einem Zivilisationswandel. Das war die Ausgangslage für ein interdisziplinär angelegtes Forschungsprojekt des Wuppertal Instituts unter der Leitung von Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Sachs. Es wurde im Sinne einer Zwischenbilanz gefragt, "ist Deutschland zukunftsfähiger geworden und wie haben sich die Bedingungen mit der Globalisierung verändert?".