Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (38)
- Part of a Book (18)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (11)
- Conference Object (8)
- Contribution to Periodical (7)
- Working Paper (5)
- Book (2)
- Periodical Part (1)
Urbane Räume sehen sich verschiedenen ökologischen, sozialen und ökonomischen Herausforderungen gegenüber, für deren Bewältigung es unter anderem neue bzw. veränderte Handlungs- und Planungsansätze bedarf. Der Klimawandel mit seinen räumlich wirksamen Folgewirkungen ist eine der zentralen ökologischen Herausforderungen des 21. Jahrhunderts. Städte sind dabei sowohl Verursacher des Klimawandels als auch Betroffene. Sie sind Wohnort, Heimat, Arbeits- und Produktionsstätte. Durch ihre hohe Bevölkerungsdichte und durch die Agglomeration ökonomischen Kapitals sind Städte aber auch stark durch Extremereignisse wie Starkniederschläge und Hitzeperioden gefährdet. Grüne Infrastrukturen können daher nicht nur eine Strategie sein, um sich gegen die Klimawandelfolgen anzupassen, sondern bieten gleichzeitig das Potenzial für neue Lebensräume, um so das Artensterben zu mindern bzw. zu stoppen. Die vorliegende Konzeptstudie widmet sich der Frage, wie Straßen im Sinne des genannten Zieldreiecks weiterentwickelt und gestaltet werden können, d.h. wie eine Transformation urbaner Quartiersstraßen hin zu "lebenswerten" Stadt- und Straßenräumen erfolgen kann.
The study "A Green New Deal for Europe" consists of two basic elements: Firstly it aims to cope with the economic crisis through intensive measures in order to systematically stimulate the eco-industries, to create jobs and to boost economic recovery. Secondly it aims at establishing the foundation for a green modernisation of the European economy. The study examines existing EU strategies policies and programs concerning their suitability to implement the Green New Deal. It proposes exemplary measures in the field of energy, mobility and resource use. The study has been compiled by the Wuppertal Institute on behalf of the Greens/European Free Alliance (EFA) Group in the European Parliament.
More and more countries are incorporating the instrument of emissions trading into their national climate policies. This emerging mosaic of emissions trading schemes (ETS) raises the question of whether they should be linked with each other. From an economic point of view, linking of domestic schemes is supposed to increase the economic efficiency of carbon markets. In addition, linking is also expected by some to yield substantial political benefits in terms of the evolution of the UNFCCC/Kyoto regime. However, these optimistic prospects are based on a best-case scenario where all major countries establish environmentally effective emissions trading systems and then link them with each other. Real-life politics might develop rather differently. This paper therefore examines to what extent the current status of emissions trading in industrialised countries provides a basis for reinforcing and moving forward the international climate regime through linking domestic ETS. After comparing emerging emissions trading schemes from an institutional perspective, it emerges that not only emissions trading is at a very early stage in most countries, in addition the emerging systems are probably going to be designed very differently from the EU ETS. While for some design features such as the coverage design differences do not matter, there are some areas where the plans in many non-EU countries look crucially different from the EU system. The outlook for a linked international ETS is therefore currently still very uncertain. Given this state of affairs, the EU should pro-actively engage with the non-EU countries to try to harmonise their developing national emissions trading schemes with the EU ETS, widely disseminate the lessons it has learned from the EU ETS, strongly make the case for environmental integrity and at the same time make clear that systems that want to link to the EU ETS will need to meet certain quality criteria.