Refine
Year of Publication
- 2013 (3) (remove)
Document Type
- Peer-Reviewed Article (1)
- Part of a Book (1)
- Report (1)
Division
Both focus group discussions and information-choice questionnaires (ICQs) have previously been used to examine informed public opinions about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). This paper presents an extensive experimental study to systematically examine and compare the quality of opinions created by these two research techniques. Depending on experimental condition, participants either participated in a focus group meeting or completed an ICQ. In both conditions participants received identical factual information about two specific CCS options. After having processed the information, they indicated their overall opinion about each CCS option. The quality of these opinions was determined by looking at three outcome-oriented indicators of opinion quality: consistency, stability, and confidence. Results for all three indicators showed that ICQs yielded higher-quality opinions than focus groups, but also that focus groups did not perform poor in this regard. Implications for the choice between focus group discussions and ICQs are discussed.
Aufgabenstellung des "Folgeprojekts CCS-Kommunikation" war es, die Bedeutung unterschiedlicher Einflussfaktoren und deren Wechselwirkungen für die Akzeptanz mit Hilfe multivariater statistischer Analysen zu untersuchen. Dabei standen folgende zentrale Fragestellungen im Mittelpunkt der Untersuchungen: Welche Faktoren sind ausschlaggebend für die 1. spontane Einstellung zu CCS? 2. Stabilität spontaner Einstellungen zu CCS? 3. Risiko- und Nutzeneinschätzungen von CCS? 4. Akzeptanz der drei CCS-Prozessschritte?
Diese Fragestellungen wurden mit unterschiedlichen multivariaten statistischen Verfahren und differenziert für unterschiedliche Ebenen oder Sachverhalte untersucht.