Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (138)
- Conference Object (64)
- Contribution to Periodical (37)
- Part of a Book (26)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (24)
- Working Paper (21)
- Book (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Lecture (1)
The economic assessment of low-carbon energy options is the primary step towards the design of policy portfolios to foster the green energy economy. However, today these assessments often fall short of including important determinants of the overall cost-benefit balance of such options by not including indirect costs and benefits, even though these can be game-changing. This is often due to the lack of adequate methodologies.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive account of the key methodological challenges to the assessment of the multiple impacts of energy options, and an initial menu of potential solutions to address these challenges.
The paper first provides evidence for the importance of the multiple impacts of energy actions in the assessment of low-carbon options.
The paper identifies a few key challenges to the evaluation of the co-impacts of low-carbon options and demonstrates that these are more complex for co-impacts than for the direct ones. Such challenges include several layers of additionality, high context dependency, and accounting for distributional effects.
The paper continues by identifying the key challenges to the aggregation of multiple impacts including the risks of overcounting while taking into account the multitude of interactions among the various co-impacts. The paper proposes an analytical framework that can help address these and frame a systematic assessment of the multiple impacts.
Energy Efficiency First (EEF) is an established principle for European Union (EU) energy policy design. It highlights the exploitation of demand-side resources and prioritizes cost-effective options from the demand-side over other options from a societal cost-benefit perspective. However, the involvement of multiple decision-makers makes it difficult to implement. Therefore, we propose a flexible decision-tree framework for applying the EEF principle based on a review of relevant areas and examples. In summary, this paper contributes to applying the EEF principle by defining and distinguishing different types of cases - (1) policy-making, and (2) system planning and investment - identifying the most common elements, and proposing a decision-tree framework that can be flexibly constructed based on the elements for different cases. Finally, we exemplify the application of this framework with two example cases: (1) planning for demand-response in the power sector, and (2) planning for a district heating system.
In Germany, the number of renewable energy prosumers has increased rapidly since 2000. However, the development of prosumers has faced and will continue to face various economic, social, and technological challenges, which have triggered the emergence of a number of innovative business models (BM). This paper enriches the empirical basis for prosumer-oriented BMs by investigating two BM innovations in Germany (P2P electricity trading and aggregation of small-size prosumers) drawing on business model and socio-technical transition theories. A mix of qualitative data collection methods, including document analysis and semi-structured expert interviews, was applied. We found that while both BMs can potentially address the challenges associated with renewable energy prosumer development in Germany, small-scale prosumers’ participation in both BMs has been limited so far. We identified various internal and external drivers and barriers for scaling up these BMs for prosumer development in Germany. Despite these barriers, both aggregation and centralized P2P targeting prosumers may potentially be also taken up by incumbent market actors such as utilities. Decentralized P2P on the other hand still faces significant internal and external barriers for upscaling. Based on the analysis, the paper provides policy recommendations with respect to the identified drivers and barriers. From a theoretical perspective, our findings provide further evidence to challenge the dichotomous understanding of niche actors and incumbents, the latter of which are often theorized to be resistant to radical innovations.
Nicht nur für den Klimaschutz führt an der Wärmewende kein Weg vorbei. Mittelfristig wird sie auch die Heizkosten senken. Kurzfristig sind allerdings erhöhte Investitionen erforderlich, die für alle tragbar sein müssen. Ein wichtiges Instrument ist dabei die kommunale Wärmeplanung.
Sie wird kommen und sie wird zu erheblichem Aufwand bei den kommunalen Gebietskörperschaften führen, aber den Bürgerinnen und Bürgern, Unternehmen und öffentlichen Einrichtungen auch Anleitung und Sicherheit für ihre Investitionen in zukunftsfähige Heizungssysteme bieten. Nach den bisherigen Planungen ist vorgesehen, dass seitens des Bundes ein Gesetz verabschiedet wird, welches die Länder verpflichten wird, flächendeckend eine kommunale Wärmeplanung zumindest für die mittleren und größeren Städte und Gemeinden vorzunehmen. Seitens der Länder wird diese Aufgabe dann an die Kommunen weitergegeben. Die Bundesländer Baden-Württemberg und Schleswig-Holstein haben bereits seit einiger Zeit Erfahrung mit diesem kommunalen Planungsinstrument. Der Gesetzentwurf auf Bundesebene wird noch für das zweite Quartal 2023 erwartet. Unabhängig davon sieht der Koalitionsvertrag der Landesregierung in Nordrhein-Westfalen vor, dass im laufenden Jahr 2023 der gesetzliche Ordnungsrahmen für die kommunale Wärmeplanung geschaffen wird. Der genaue Zeitplan steht somit noch nicht fest; klar ist aber, dass es in absehbarer Zeit zu einer Verpflichtung für die NRW-Kommunen kommen wird, solche Pläne zu erstellen. Es lohnt daher, sich bereits frühzeitig mit dem Thema zu befassen.
Im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz hat das Wuppertal Institut zusammen mit dem Büro Ö-quadrat einen Tarifvorschlag für Strom hinsichtlich seiner Auswirkungen begutachtet. Zielsetzung dieses Gutachtens war es einerseits herauszuarbeiten, ob der Tarifvorschlag unter der Bedingung, dass die Einführung des Tarifs für den jeweiligen Stromanbieter insgesamt erlösneutral gestaltet wird, nachhaltig zu einer finanziellen Entlastung der einkommensschwachen Haushalte beitragen kann. Andererseits wurde analysiert, ob der Vorschlag auch mit Klimaschutzerfordernissen und einer Gesamtstrategie zum Umbau der Energieversorgung kompatibel ist, die eine Umstellung auf regenerative Energien beinhaltet sowie eine deutliche Steigerung der Endenergieeffizienz vorsieht. Ergebnis: Die verpflichtende Einführung von "Stromspartarifen" ist nicht geeignet, einkommensschwache Haushalte bei Energiepreissteigerungen zu entlasten und gibt keinen Anreiz zur Stromeinsparung. Das Gutachten weist auf eine Fülle von Schwächen bei den vorgeschlagenen Tarifmodellen hin.
The German climate change programme (2000) identified the residential sector as one of the main sectors in which to achieve additional GHG reductions. Our case study compiles results of existing evaluations of the key policies and measures that were planned and introduced and carries out some own estimates of achievements. We show, which emission reductions and which instruments where planned and what was delivered until 2004.
Legal instruments such as the revised building code were introduced later than planned and their effects will - at least partly - fall behind expectations. Other legal instruments such as minimum energy performance standards for domestic appliances etc. were - in spite of the programme - not implemented yet.
On the other hand, substantial financial incentives were introduced. Especially schemes granting low-interest loans for building renovation were introduced. However tax subsidies for low-energy buildings were phased out.
In general we can conclude from our case study that Germany was not able to compensate for the slower or restricted implementation of legal instruments through the introduction of financial incentives. Particularly the efficient use of electricity has been left aside as almost no further policy action was taken since 2001.
Thus energy efficiency in the residential sector will not deliver the GHG reductions planned for in the German climate change programme until 2005. From our findings we draw conclusions and recommendations towards policy makers: Which lessons are to be learnt and what has to be done in order to fully harness EE potentials in residential sector as planned for 2010?