Refine
Document Type
- Conference Object (3)
- Report (3)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (1)
Der Teilbericht 4 beschreibt eine multikriterielle, transparente und für Entscheider handhabbare Methode, mit der transparente Entscheidungen über die Förderung vielversprechender Demonstrations- und Modellvorhaben in der anwendungsnahen Forschung ermöglichen werden. Für Fördermittelgeber bietet die Methode eine orientierende Hilfestellung für in der Regel in diesem Kontext notwendigen Einzelfallentscheidungen. Die Methodik wurde im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens "Technologien für die Energiewende" entwickelt. Teil A enthält die Anforderung und die Methodik.
Der Teilbericht 4 beschreibt eine multikriterielle, transparente und für Entscheider handhabbare Methode, mit der transparente Entscheidungen über die Förderung vielversprechender Demonstrations- und Modellvorhaben in der anwendungsnahen Forschung ermöglichen werden. Für Fördermittelgeber bietet die Methode eine orientierende Hilfestellung für in der Regel in diesem Kontext notwendigen Einzelfallentscheidungen. Die Methodik wurde im Rahmen des Forschungsvorhabens "Technologien für die Energiewende" entwickelt. Teil B stellt einen Leitfaden zur Durchführung der Methode bereit.
There is an increasing pressure that enhanced and novel energy technologies are swiftly adopted by the market to ensure meeting the energy and climate targets. An important issue with such novel developments is their risk to be stuck in the "valley of death", i.e. that their transition to the market is delayed or unsuccessful. Publicly supported demonstration projects could help to bridge the valley of death by reducing barriers to the adoption caused by missing information and perceived risks. A challenge for technology demonstrations in the industrial context is their often high investments that are required to prove their real-world benefits. Given the magnitude of such investments, it becomes crucial that public funding focuses on the most promising demonstration proposals. Structured evaluation processes can help to facilitate the identification of promising proposals and to improve the quality and transparency of decisions. This paper deals with a corresponding multi-staged multi-criteria decision support system (DSS) suggested to the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. It deals with the evaluation of demonstration proposals across three stages: The first stage represents a filtering stage to identify those proposals relevant for further considerations. The second stage comprises a multi-criteria scoring method drawing on an evaluation against nineteen criteria. The final third stage serves to critically review the need for public funding of well-scored proposals. This contribution outlines the development of the DSS and its design and thus provides insights on proposal evaluating in energy research.
New energy technologies may fail to make the transition to the market once research funding has ended due to a lack of private engagement to conclude their development. Extending public funding to cover such experimental developments could be one way to improve this transition. However, identifying promising research and development (R&D) proposals for this purpose is a difficult task for the following reasons: Close-to-market implementations regularly require substantial resources while public budgets are limited; the allocation of public funds needs to be fair, open, and documented; the evaluation is complex and subject to public sector regulations for public engagement in R&D funding. This calls for a rigorous evaluation process. This paper proposes an operational three-staged decision support system (DSS) to assist decision-makers in public funding institutions in the ex-ante evaluation of R&D proposals for large-scale close-to-market projects in energy research. The system was developed based on a review of literature and related approaches from practice combined with a series of workshops with practitioners from German public funding institutions. The results confirm that the decision-making process is a complex one that is not limited to simply scoring R&D proposals. Decision-makers also have to deal with various additional issues such as determining the state of technological development, verifying market failures or considering existing funding portfolios. The DSS that is suggested in this paper is unique in the sense that it goes beyond mere multi-criteria aggregation procedures and addresses these issues as well to help guide decision-makers in public institutions through the evaluation process.
