Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
- 2016 (71) (remove)
Document Type
- Peer-Reviewed Article (19)
- Report (15)
- Conference Object (12)
- Contribution to Periodical (11)
- Part of a Book (8)
- Working Paper (4)
- Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Division
- Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme (71) (remove)
This article reviews the literature on the past cost dynamics of various renewable, fossil fuel and nuclear electricity generation technologies. It identifies 10 different factors which have played key roles in influencing past cost developments according to the literature. These 10 factors are: deployment-induced learning, research, development and demonstration (RD&D)-induced learning, knowledge spillovers from other technologies, upsizing, economies of manufacturing scale, economies of project scale, changes in material and labour costs, changes in fuel costs, regulatory changes, and limits to the availability of suitable sites. The article summarises the relevant literature findings for each of these 10 factors and provides an overview indicating which factors have impacted on which generation technologies. The article also discusses the insights gained from the review for a better understanding of possible future cost developments of electricity generation technologies. Finally, future research needs, which may support a better understanding of past and future cost developments, are identified.
The Greens / European Free Alliance Group of the European Parliament contracted Wuppertal Institute in collaboration with Energiaklub to develop scientifically sound, comprehensive, alternative, and sustainable long term energy scenarios for Hungary, which cover potential development paths till 2030 and 2050. The scenarios developed deliver information about the costs and long-term effects of different energy choices for Hungary as well as credible information on potential benefits of greening the energy mix. As a result, the study aims to provide policy makers with better evidence for making informed, prudent and forward-thinking decisions in this field.
Als Beitrag zu einer fundierten Diskussion über adäquate Politikinstrumente in der Wärmewende hat der FVEE mit seinen Mitgliedsinstituten im September 2015 ein Positionspapier erstellt: "Erneuerbare Energien im Wärmesektor - Aufgaben, Empfehlungen und Perspektiven". Dieses gibt einen umfassenden Überblick über die Herausforderungen und Handlungsoptionen im Wärmesektor und bietet damit eine wichtige Orientierung bei der Gestaltung der Energiewende.
Um die Energiewende erfolgreich umzusetzen, plädiert der FVEE für eine deutliche Stärkung des Wärmesektors in der Energiepolitik und eine entschiedene und langfristig angelegte Politik der Wärmewende, die den besonderen Anforderungen des Wärmesektors gerecht wird. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden ausgewählte Analyseergebnisse und Empfehlungen des Positionspapiers vorgestellt.
Die Energiewende stellt eine gesellschaftliche Herausforderung dar und bedarf neuer Arbeitskonzepte. Diese These vertreten Uta von Winterfeld und Adelheid Biesecker in ihrem Beitrag "Bitte zweimal wenden! - Die Transformation der Energie- und Arbeitswelt". Ausgehend davon, dass die Energiewende einer sozial-ökonomischen Revolution gleichkomme und die Geschichte der Energie eine Geschichte steigender Arbeitsproduktivität sei, weswegen regenerative Energiequellen wie Sonne und Wind die Entwicklung bedrohen und zu einer Rückkehr zu einer früheren zivilisatorischen Phase führen würden, zeigen die Autorinnen, dass man zu letzterer Einsicht nur dann gelangt, wenn man die Energiewende ohne die notwendige Arbeitswende betrachtet. Damit die Energiewende nicht nur gelingt, sondern auch wirtschaftlich und gesellschaftlich positiv verläuft, braucht es laut Autorinnen eine Neuorganisation von Energie und Arbeit.
Carbon markets in a <2 °C world : will there be room for international carbon trading in 2050?
(2016)
This JIKO Policy Paper analyses a series of very ambitious mitigation scenarios and complements this analysis with a review of several sectoral technology roadmaps. The results are quite clear: there is no reason to believe that international carbon trading will become obsolete any time soon. Whether or not international carbon trading is to play a role in international climate protection efforts is in the end not a physical or economic question, but a political one.
Will climate change stay below the 2 degree target in the 21st century on the basis of the COP 21 results? Looking into challenges and opportunities, this paper answers: To stay below the global 2dt is neither a real choice for the world society nor for businesses and civil societies in specific countries. It is a global guideline, scientifically developed for global negotiations, which should be broken down to national interests and actors. Key questions concerning the energy sector from the perspective of national interests are how to create and sustain a momentum for the inevitable energy transition, how to encourage disruptive innovations, avoid lock in effects, enable rapid deployment of energy efficiency and renewable energies etc. Or in other words: how to get to a competitive, economically benign, inclusive, low carbon and risk minimising energy system. With this background the paper argues that "burden sharing" is a misleading perception of strong climate mitigation strategies. It is more realistic to talk about "benefit sharing", using the monetary benefits and co-benefits of climate mitigation (e.g. energy cost savings, revenues from CO2-tax or emission trading systems) to help vulnerable national and international actors to adapt to the unavoidable climate risks. It has to be demonstrated on country level that the technologies and policy mix of strong climate mitigation and risk-minimising actions are indeed "benefit sharing" strategies which should be chosen anyhow, even if there was no climate change. For China and Germany this paper includes basic findings supporting this view.