Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
- 2013 (75) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (21)
- Contribution to Periodical (17)
- Report (13)
- Conference Object (11)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (9)
- Book (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Periodical Part (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Soll der Staat oder der Markt der Hauptakteur im Prozess einer "Großen Transformation" der Gesellschaft sein? Und: Welcher Staat und welcher Markt? Deutlich wird, dass eine Transformation Richtung Nachhaltigkeit nicht gelingen kann, wenn alte Rationalitäts muster - wie die vom starken Staat und vom selbstregulieren den Markt - fortbestehen. Dagegen muss ein demokratischer Prozess stehen, der auf den Fähigkeiten der Bürger(innen) basiert und der emanzipatorische und herrschafts kritische Bewegungen stärkt.
Conventional new buildings in OECD countries with a history of building codes save about 50 % of energy compared to average buildings in the building stock. This improvement, however, is not enough to create a building standard with low lifetime costs nor to reach long-term climate protection targets. Much higher energy savings can already be achieved through proven high-efficiency building concepts bringing net economic benefits among other advantages.
A strategic approach to integrated building design is the key to achieving these high-energy savings at low or no extra cost in residential buildings. In our paper we describe the "Easy Efficiency Approach", which can reduce primary energy consumption by 40 to 60 % compared to conventional new building standards, or by 70% to 80% when compared to the primary energy consumption of the existing building stock, and should be regarded as the minimum. This strategy focuses on low-cost options, mainly passive options. Although it can already significantly reduce energy consumption, this first step will not be sufficient to reach long-term climate protection goals. It is thus necessary to implement and support what we call an "Advanced Efficiency Approach", with savings up to 90% , as compared to new building standards, as soon as possible to avoid lock-in effects. Further improvements, especially through the active use of renewable energies, reduce the net primary energy demand to 0 % and beyond.
According to the chosen strategy clearly defined energy performance ranges, with reference to possible savings, for different climate zones worldwide are given. In verifying this approach simulations with BAT (Best Available Technologies) buildings of different types (single family, multi family, high rise) were carried out in close cooperation with project partners. This data has also been verified through an empirical database of built examples both for energy consumption as well their economic soundness.
Both focus group discussions and information-choice questionnaires (ICQs) have previously been used to examine informed public opinions about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). This paper presents an extensive experimental study to systematically examine and compare the quality of opinions created by these two research techniques. Depending on experimental condition, participants either participated in a focus group meeting or completed an ICQ. In both conditions participants received identical factual information about two specific CCS options. After having processed the information, they indicated their overall opinion about each CCS option. The quality of these opinions was determined by looking at three outcome-oriented indicators of opinion quality: consistency, stability, and confidence. Results for all three indicators showed that ICQs yielded higher-quality opinions than focus groups, but also that focus groups did not perform poor in this regard. Implications for the choice between focus group discussions and ICQs are discussed.