Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
- 2016 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Report (3)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (1)
- Contribution to Periodical (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Division
- Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme (6) (remove)
Contrary to "static" pathways that are defined once for all, this article deals with the need for policy makers to adopt a dynamic adaptive policy pathway for managing decarbonization over the period of implementation. When choosing a pathway as the most desirable option, it is important to keep in mind that each decarbonization option relies on the implementation of specific policies and instruments. Given structural, effectiveness, and timing uncertainties specific to each policy option, they may fail in delivering the expected outcomes in time. The possibility of diverging from an initial decarbonization trajectory to another one without incurring excessive costs should therefore be a strategic element in the design of an appropriate decarbonization strategy. The article relies on initial experiences in France and Germany on decarbonization planning and implementation to define elements for managing dynamic adjustment issues. Such an adaptive pathway strategy should combine long-lived incentives, like a pre-announced escalating carbon price, to form consistent expectations, as well as adaptive policies to improve overall robustness and resilience. We sketch key elements of a monitoring process based on an ex ante definition of leading indicators that should be assessed regularly and combined with signposts and trigger values at the subsector level.
Um weltweit hochindustrialisierte, energieintensive Bundesländer und Regionen bei der Entwicklung und Umsetzung von innovativer Klimapolitik zu unterstützen, wurde die "Energy Transition Platform" ins Leben gerufen. Ziel ist der Austausch von Erfahrungen sowie eine Einflussnahme auf den internationalen Klimadialog. Für diesen Austausch- und Dialogprozess erarbeitete das Wuppertal Institut für die "Climate Group" die Fallstudie "Eine Industrieregion im Wandel - Energie- und klimapolitische Rahmenbedingungen, Strategien und Instrumente in NRW". In dem Bericht werden aktuelle energie- und klimapolitische Entwicklungen, Politikinstrumente und Modellprojekte dargestellt und diskutiert.
Die Fallstudie macht deutlich, dass Nordrhein-Westfalen bei der Umsetzung der Energiewende zwar vor besonderen Herausforderungen steht, die Modernisierung des Energiesystems und des Industriestandortes NRW jedoch mit Hilfe eines vielfältigen Instrumentariums systematisch und intensiv angeht. Eine solche proaktive und langfristig ausgelegte Herangehensweise ist zentrale Voraussetzung dafür, dass die bevorstehende Transformation letztlich nicht zu einem kaum steuerbaren Strukturbruch in NRW und seinen Regionen und Kommunen führt, sondern zu einem schrittweisen Strukturwandel, der von Politik, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft gemeinsam gestaltet wird.
Rather than examining aggregate emissions trends, this study delves deep into the dynamics affecting each sector of the EU energy system. It examines the structural changes taking place in power production, transport, buildings and industry, and benchmarks these with the changes required to reach the 2030 and 2050 targets. In so doing it aims to influence both the ambition and direction of future policy decisions, both at Member State and EU level.
In order to assess the adequacy of the EU and its Member States policies with the 2030 and 2050 decarbonisation objectives, this study goes beyond the aggregate GHG emissions or energy use figures and analyse the underlying drivers of emission changes, following a sectoral approach (power generation, buildings, industry, and transport). Historical trends of emission drivers are compared with the required long-term deep decarbonisation pathways, which provide sectoral "benchmarks" or "corridors" against which to analyse the rate and direction of historical change for each Member State and the EU in aggregate. This approach allows the identification of the necessary structural changes in the energy system and policy interventions to reach deep decarbonisation, and therefore the comparison with the current policy programs at European and Member State level.
Will climate change stay below the 2 degree target in the 21st century on the basis of the COP 21 results? Looking into challenges and opportunities, this paper answers: To stay below the global 2dt is neither a real choice for the world society nor for businesses and civil societies in specific countries. It is a global guideline, scientifically developed for global negotiations, which should be broken down to national interests and actors. Key questions concerning the energy sector from the perspective of national interests are how to create and sustain a momentum for the inevitable energy transition, how to encourage disruptive innovations, avoid lock in effects, enable rapid deployment of energy efficiency and renewable energies etc. Or in other words: how to get to a competitive, economically benign, inclusive, low carbon and risk minimising energy system. With this background the paper argues that "burden sharing" is a misleading perception of strong climate mitigation strategies. It is more realistic to talk about "benefit sharing", using the monetary benefits and co-benefits of climate mitigation (e.g. energy cost savings, revenues from CO2-tax or emission trading systems) to help vulnerable national and international actors to adapt to the unavoidable climate risks. It has to be demonstrated on country level that the technologies and policy mix of strong climate mitigation and risk-minimising actions are indeed "benefit sharing" strategies which should be chosen anyhow, even if there was no climate change. For China and Germany this paper includes basic findings supporting this view.