Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
- 2014 (6) (remove)
Document Type
- Part of a Book (2)
- Contribution to Periodical (2)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (1)
- Working Paper (1)
Division
In the debate about the transformation process towards sustainability manifold eco social economic concepts are discussed. Most of them lay claim to democracy, to processes of inclusion of all who are affected. But do alternative concepts automatically lead to democracy, overcoming hierarchies, power and exclusion? Based on this question, the article discusses two eco social concepts: Vorsorgendes Wirtschaften and Small new Social Contracts. It throws the light on traps like repressive or instrumental forms of inclusion and ends with three clues for a transformative democratic way to sustainability.
Since in 1992 the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) has been held in Rio de Janeiro, efforts to achieve sustainable development appear to have made only insufficient progress, as the results of the 2012 follow-up conference show. One reason for this is that among the various paths to sustainability being discussed, the strategies enjoying greater support are those that continue to be committed to economic and material growth, this as opposed to those that question the growth paradigm. Among the latter are the sufficiency and subsistence approaches. The sufficiency approach delves into the causes and (supposed) boons of a continuous increase in material and immaterial goods. With the demand that individuals not always be forced to always want more, it points out a way to a structural transition in society. The subsistence approach, on the other hand, seeks to draft a path to greater autonomy and quality of life by strengthening regional, local or indi-vidual self-provisioning. To be in harmony with sustainability, it must be possible to freely choose the two ways of life; they must not be mandated by the authorities.