Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (409)
- Report (361)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (243)
- Part of a Book (214)
- Conference Object (143)
- Working Paper (63)
- Doctoral Thesis (24)
- Book (17)
- Master Thesis (4)
- Lecture (3)
Language
Division
The paper reviews the current knowledge on the use of biomass for non-food purposes, critically discusses its environmental sustainability implications, and describes the needs for further research, thus enabling a more balanced policy approach. The life-cylce wide impacts of the use of biomass for energy and material purposes derived from either direct crop harvest or residuals indicate that biomass based substitutes have a different, not always superior environmental performance than comparable fossil based products. Cascading use, i.e. when biomass is used for material products first and the energy content is recovered from the end-of-life products, tends to provide a higher environmental benefit than primary use as fuel. Due to limited global land resources, non-food biomass may only substitute for a certain share of non-renewables. If the demand for non-food biomass, especially fuel crops and its derivates, continues to grow this will inevitably lead to an expansion of global arable land at the expense of natural ecosystems such as savannas and tropical rain forests. Whereas the current aspirations and incentives to increase the use of non-food biomass are intended to counteract climate change and environmental degradation, they are thus bound to a high risk of problem shifting and may even lead to a global deterioration of the environment. Although the "balanced approach" of the European Union's biomass strategy may be deemed a good principle, the concrete targets and implementation measures in the Union and countries like Germany should be revisited. Likewise, countries like Brazil and Indonesia may revisit their strategies to use their natural resources for export or domestic purposes. Further research is needed to optimize the use of biomass within and between regions.
Anpassung der Planungs- und Auslegungsgrundlagen an den Klimawandel : Schutz von Infrastrukturen
(2007)
Inducing the international diffusion of carbon capture and storage technologies in the power sector
(2007)
Although CO2 capture and storage(CCS) technologies are heatedly debated, many politicians and energy producers consider them to be a possible technical option to mitigate carbon dioxide from large-point sources. Hence, both national and international decision-makers devote a growing amount of capacities and financial resources to CCS in order to develop and demonstrate the technology and enable ist broad diffusion.The presented report concentrates on the influence of policy incentives on CCS diffusion and examines the following research question: Which policy strategy is needed to stimulate the international diffusion of carbon capture and storage technologies in the power sector? Based on the analysis of innovation-specific (e.g. CCS competitiveness and compatibility), market-related (e.g. national CO2 discharges and storage capacities) and institutional determinants (e.g. existing national and international policy frameworks) of CCS diffusion, the paper discusses the suitability of various national and international policy instruments to induce the international deployment of CCS. Afterwards, three CCS diffusion paths are derived from fundamentally different carbon stabilisation scenarios which include climate policy measures to stimulate the adoption of CO2 mitigation technologies.
Die vorliegende Broschüre setzt sich mit der Technologie der CO2-Abtrennung und Speicherung (CCS: Carbon Capture and Storage) auseinander. Sie bereitet den heute verfügbaren Sachstand auf und beschreibt die Entwicklungsperspektiven und Potenziale. Sie geht dabei sowohl diagnostisch als auch analytisch vor und zeigt die noch offenen Fragen für die Bewertung dieser Technologielinie sowie die noch notwendigen Handlungsschritte für ihre Umsetzung auf.
For the option of “carbon capture and storage”, an integrated assessment in the form of a life cycle analysis and a cost assessment combined with a systematic comparison with renewable energies regarding future conditions in the power plant market for the situation in Germany is done. The calculations along the whole process chain show that CCS technologies emit per kWh more than generally assumed in clean-coal concepts (total CO2 reduction by 72-90% and total greenhouse gas reduction by 65-79%) and considerable more if compared with renewable electricity. Nevertheless, CCS could lead to a significant absolute reduction of GHG-emissions within the electricity supply system. Furthermore, depending on the growth rates and the market development, renewables could develop faster and could be in the long term cheaper than CCS based plants. Especially, in Germany, CCS as a climate protection option is phasing a specific problem as a huge amount of fossil power plant has to be substituted in the next 15 years where CCS technologies might be not yet available. For a considerable contribution of CCS to climate protection, the energy structure in Germany requires the integration of capture ready plants into the current renewal programs. If CCS retrofit technologies could be applied at least from 2020, this would strongly decrease the expected CO2 emissions and would give a chance to reach the climate protection goal of minus 80% including the renewed fossil-fired power plants.
An die Leserinnen und Leser
(2007)
Atomstreit mit dem Iran, Unruhen in Nigeria, Hurrikans in den USA: immer neue Krisen treiben den Ölpreis in die Höhe. Und wir hängen am immer teurer werdenden Tropf, ob Industriebetrieb oder Verbraucher. Öl, unser wichtigster Energieträger, heizt nicht nur das Klima auf, sondern entpuppt sich zunehmend als Krisenfaktor für die Welt.
Mit der stetig wachsenden Verletzlichkeit unserer Energiesysteme reift die Erkenntnis, welche grundlegenden strukturellen Faktoren die Energiesicherheit bestimmen. Wie können wir unsere Abhängigkeit von Energieimporten verringern, den Klimaschutz verbessern und globale sozioökonomische Schieflagen entschärfen?
Eine Vielzahl von Vorschlägen ist in diesem Buch zusammengestellt: internationale Energiekooperationen "auf Augenhöhe", Steigerung der Energieeffizienz, Solarstromtransport aus Nordafrika, geopolitische Strategien oder diplomatisches Engagement in China, ... Wer sich für die ökologische, wirtschaftliche und soziale Zukunft unseres Planeten interessiert, kommt am Öl nicht vorbei - und sollte dieses Buch lesen.