Zukünftige Energie- und Industriesysteme
Refine
Year of Publication
- 2014 (74) (remove)
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (20)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (17)
- Report (14)
- Conference Object (9)
- Part of a Book (7)
- Working Paper (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (2)
- Book (1)
- Master Thesis (1)
Sustainability policy in the early 2000s is based on and therefore influenced by scientific literature on "transition". The importance of this link has inspired the authors to explore the structure of cooperating authors and citation networks in the field. In order to understand "transition" literature, we compare it with an alternative term for change, "transformation", which is also used in the context of socio-technical shifts towards sustainability. We expose the different structures of these fields with an overview of keywords, key references, key authors, and the coherence between references and authors. By analysing co-author and citation networks, we find large differences in these groups of documents. The transition literature is characterised by a large network of directly and indirectly cooperating authors with clear clusters; transformation literature contains smaller author networks. Key transition authors are predominantly Dutch. They repeatedly write together and cite each other's work. The transition literature is tightly knit with high degrees of internal references and a clearly distinguishable core. Transformation literature has fewer connections between authors and articles. The connecting articles, each with many global citations, form its basis. This analysis can be used as a step to continue the debate on the role of transition and transformation literature in sustainability and renewable energy policy. The transformation literature teaches us that older streams of thought are still relevant and may be used as "glue" for linking change with respect to sustainable energy to wider developments. Rediscovering existing literature in new combinations may lead to promising new views on sustainable energy.
Über eines scheint sich die Weltgemeinschaft im Zeitalter der Globalisierung weitgehend einig zu sein: Ohne internationale Verträge lassen sich bestimmte ökonomische, ökologische und soziale Ziele nicht erreichen. Folgerichtig gibt es zahlreiche solcher Übereinkünfte mit teilweise konkret formulierten Zielen. Doch wie steht es um deren Zielerreichung? Wie kann die Zielerreichung erhöht werden? Die Beiträge dieses Bandes beleuchten die aktuelle wissenschaftliche Diskussion zu diesen Fragestellungen näher.
The main objective of this article is to evaluate CO2 mitigation potential and to calculate costs avoided by the use of different CO2 mitigation technologies in China's cement sector, namely energy efficiency improvements, use of alternative fuels, clinker substitution and carbon capture and storage (CCS). Three scenarios are designed based on the projection of cement output and technology development over the next 40 years (2010–2050). 2.5, 4.7 and 4.3 Gt tonnes of CO2 will be saved totally in basic scenario and two low carbon scenarios up to 2050. By comparing these technologies along the scenarios, it can be concluded that CO2 emissions can mainly be reduced by energy efficiency improvements and use of alternative fuels. Clinker substitution, which reduces the clinker-to-cement ratio as well as energy intensity, results in significant cost advantages. CCS, including post-combustion capture and oxy-fuel combustion capture, could play an important role in the capture of CO2 in the cement industry, and is expected to be in commercial use by 2030.