Refine
Year of Publication
- 2006 (245) (remove)
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (97)
- Report (47)
- Part of a Book (45)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (21)
- Conference Object (17)
- Working Paper (10)
- Book (2)
- Master Thesis (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Habilitation (1)
After two weeks of negotiations, climate diplomats completed the implementation of the Protocol, refined some of its instruments for implementation and agreed on processes for moving forward beyond the first Kyoto commitment period. The report by the Wuppertal Institute provides an overview and assessment of the agreements reached in Montreal.
Im Zeitalter der Aufklärung werden mittelalterliche Naturvorstellungen von neuzeitlichen abgelöst, die von Naturbeherrschung geprägt sind. Doch weshalb mussten auf der Epochenschwelle Scheiterhaufen brennen, weshalb war die Befreiung aus dem Naturzusammenhang patriarchal angelegt? Uta von Winterfeld untersucht aus feministischer und herrschaftskritischer Perspektive "Naturpatriarchen" auf die Schattenseiten ihrer aufklärenden Absicht: Das befreite Denken eines René Descartes ist auf Kontrolle und Beherrschung der Natur angewiesen; bei Francis Bacon verdrängt das männliche Schaffen die produktive Seite einer als weiblich gedachten Natur; Giordano Bruno verweist darauf, wie widersprüchlich und ambivalent neuzeitliche Naturvorstellungen sind. Die damals entstehenden Naturwissenschaften entzaubern eine "dunkle" oder "böse" Natur - die doch zuvor von geistlichen und weltlichen Obrigkeiten in Gestalt der dunklen und bösen "Hexe" erst geschaffen worden ist. Die Frage der Naturpatriarchen nach der Methode des richtigen Vernunftgebrauchs gilt noch immer: Wie kann ein emanzipiertes Subjekt aus dem Naturzusammenhang befreit werden, ohne ihm ein anderes Subjekt, als Objekt, zwangsläufig zu unterwerfen?
In the long term, any definition of adequacy consistent with UNFCCC Article 2 will require increased mitigation efforts from almost all countries. Therefore, an expansion of emission limitation commitments will form a central element of any future architecture of the climate regime. This expansion has two elements: deepening of quantitative commitments for Annex B countries and the adoption of commitments for those countries outside of the current limitation regime. This article seeks to provide a more analytical basis for further differentiation among non-Annex I countries. To be both fair and reflective of national circumstances, it is based on the criteria of responsibility, capability and potential to mitigate. Altogether, non-Annex I countries were differentiated in four groups, each including countries with similar national circumstances: newly industrialized countries (NICs), rapidly industrializing countries (RIDCs), ‘other developing countries’, and least developed countries (LDCs). Based on the same criteria that were used for differentiating among non-Annex I countries, a set of decision rules was developed to assign mitigation and financial transfer commitments to each group of countries (including Annex I countries). Applying these decision rules results in (strict) reduction commitments for Annex I countries, but also implies quantifiable mitigation obligations for NICs and RIDCs, assisted by financial transfers from the North. Other developing countries are obliged to take qualitative commitments, but quantifiable mitigation commitments for these countries and the LDC group would be not justifiable. As national circumstances in countries evolve over time, the composition of the groups will change according to agreed triggers.