Dieser Bericht ist das Resultat eines Diskussionsprozesses mehrerer Akteursgruppen zum Thema "Senken und CDM/JI", durchgeführt vom Wuppertal Institut vom September 2002 bis Juni 2003. Der Prozess wurde vom Bundesumweltministerium in Auftrag gegeben und hatte das Ziel, die nationale Debatte um Senken-Projekte zu strukturieren und so eine verbesserte politische Entscheidungsfindung zu ermöglichen. Dringend nötig wurde dies, nachdem sowohl auf nationaler, als auch auf europäischer und internationaler Ebene politische Entscheidungen ausstanden. Die Debatte hat unterschiedliche Aspekte: Zum einen besteht die Sorge, dass Senken-Projekte die wahren Ursachen des Klimawandels verschleiern könnten, zum anderen wird argumentiert, dass die Sequestrierung von Kohlenstoffdioxid nicht gleichwertig zu einer Emissionsreduzierung ist. Hinzu kommt das Problem ihrer Quantifizierung. Die Befürworter entgegnen, dass diese Probleme beispielsweise mit Hilfe des TCER-Ansatzes behoben werden können. Zusätzlich werden die sozio-ökonomischen und ökologischen Nebeneffekte von Senken-Projekten diskutiert.
Die CDM/JI-Initiative des BMU : für mehr Engagement in internationalen Klimaschutzinvestitionen
(2008)
Taking public transport by bus in the Chinese Metropolis Hefei as an example, the report analyses the practicability of standardised baselines as possible instruments for climate protection funding. The development of standardised baselines for the transport sector has been pushed since the nineties in order to better assess emission reductions of CDM projects. Further aims of standardising are a clinical comparison and a precise forecasting. For all projects of a defined sector, class, size or a given geographical origin it is possible to develop standardised baselines in the sense of reference value for emissions. The report was produced in the context of the initiative "Partnership on Sustainable Low Carbon Transport" (SLoCaT), commissioned by the Asian Development Bank. It complements the study "Applicability of Post 2012 Climate Instruments to the Transport Sector (SITS)", that analyses the impacts of climate protection funding mechanisms like the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) in the transport sector of metropolises in emerging nations and gives recommendations for the further development of financing mechanisms.
As part of the discussion on a new international climate agreement, which is supposed to be concluded by 2015, the European Commission conducted a stakeholder consultation, to which the Wuppertal Institute contributed. The Wuppertal Institute suggests that Parties should revisit the widely shared assumption that there is a trade-off between climate protection and economic well-being. The problem is not so much the macro-economic outlook. The problem is that climate policy causes substantial distributional impacts and thus naturally leads to resistance. The Wuppertal Institute recommends to reconsider the political wisdom of the quantity-based approach that climate policy has so far been based on. As long as emissions are seen as inextricably linked to economic well-being, framing commitments in terms of emission reductions directly triggers the perspective of seeing climate protection as an economic loss. Commitments should ideally be multi-dimensional. Possible types of commitments to consider may include scaling up certain climate-friendly technologies, improving energy efficiency, limiting fossil fuel use and fossil fuel extraction, or emission price commitments. The strongest mobilisation of political support might perhaps be achieved by framing commitments as a joint international undertaking to provide universal access to sustainable energy services by a specific date.