Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (70)
- Report (44)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (29)
- Contribution to Periodical (23)
- Working Paper (21)
- Conference Object (12)
- Book (10)
- Periodical Part (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Habilitation (1)
Digitalisation is taking place at a fast pace in all European countries and it is transforming the economies, societies, communication, jobs and the necessary skills for the workplace and everyday life. The Covid-19 pandemic is also accelerating digitalisation at many levels.
To address the great challenges resulting from this, the European Commission has launched the Green Deal, a long-term transformation strategy towards an innovative and sustainable society. Three important initiatives under the Green Deal are the New Circular Economy Action Plan, the Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the Zero Pollution Action Plan. The various strategies and action plans draw up a large portfolio of measures, instruments and milestones that are always linked to digital technologies. Ideally, these are eco-innovative and sustainable and contribute to improving living conditions in Europe.
The EIO Biennial Report 2020, which looks at a different topic every two years, considers digitalisation a major opportunity to accelerate the transition to a circular Europe. In the current report, the authors provide an overview of eco-innovation trends, illustrated by digital technology and policy practices that can further drive the circular economy.
The contribution of natural resources and ecosystems to economic processes still remains under-assessed by market evaluation and productivity analysis. Following the historical lines of the classical productivity debate ranging from the French Physiocrats to early neoclassical growth theories, the productivity concept underwent a gradual transformation from its previous understanding based on natural resources and other environmental factors to its contemporary narrow notion. This paper claims that the course of the classical debate has shaped the scope of predominant contemporary analysis. Except for some very recent findings, multifactor productivity largely focusses on a two-factor model. Material Flow Analysis (MFA) provides a useful step for widening the measurement and notion of productivity.
The article analyses Japanese approaches to dealing with eco-efficiency from an institutional perspective. Our main outlook is that though promising attempts have been made despite the overall economic crisis, a better horizontal coordination among both administrations and businesses is required. The governance processes can be analysed following approaches developed by New Institutional Economics and related policy analysis. The paper is divided into three sections. The first introduces the concept of eco-efficiency and explains the demand for regulatory policies from theories of market failures; the paper argues in favour of innovationoriented regulation. The second examines how a nation's institutional capabilities influence knowledge generation towards new solutions that sell on the markets; the "capacity-building approach" as developed by Martin Jänicke is explicitly discussed. The third section discusses contemporary Japanese policies with regard to waste, energy and material flows both on the governmental and the business level. It explains how European approaches diffuse and merge with domestic Japanese institutions. However, governance of eco-efficiency is expected to continue to differ due to ongoing national differences and specific conditions of knowledge creation.
The paper sketches out a theoretical framework for analysing the interplay between eco-efficiency, cognition and institutions. It derives from analytical shortfalls of the prevailing literature, which features strongly engineering and business economics, by using insights from New Institutional Economics, from Cognitive Sciences and, partly, from Evolutionary Economics. It emphasises the role cognition and institutions play in the adoption of "green" technologies by firms. A cognitive perspective derives from recent research on simple heuristics and context-based rationality; it is proposed that those recent findings can serve to analyse decision-making of individual actors or firms and, thus, should complement economic analysis. A second proposition is that eco-efficiency and normative rules such as a Factor Four strongly rely upon institutions, i.e. the ability of institutions to evolve over time and the development of those institutions that are most appropriate to enhance technological change. In this regard, business institutions and competition are crucial, but regulatory needs remain in order to safeguard continuity of knowledge creation. The framework allows for an analysis why overall adoption of eco-efficiency still can be considered relatively slow and why some markets and firms are far ahead. As a brief case study the article reflects upon German waste law’s ability to enhance eco-efficiency.
Ende der Arbeitsproduktivität? : Von der Produktivität der Arbeit zur Produktivität der Ressourcen
(1998)
The paper sketches out a theoretical framework for analysing the interplay between eco-efficiency, cognition and institutions. It derives from analytical shortfalls of the prevailing literature, which features strongly engineering and business economics, by using insights from New Institutional Economics, from Cognitive Science and, partly, from Evolutionary Economics. It emphasises the role cognition and institutions play in the adoption of "green" technologies by firms. A cognitive perspective derives from recent research on simple heuristics and context-based rationality; it is proposed that those findings can serve to analyse decision-making of individual actors respectively firms and, thus, should complement economic analysis. A second proposition is that eco-efficiency and normative rules such as a Factor Four strongly rely upon institutions, i.e. the ability of institutions to evolve over time and the development of those institutions that are most appropriate to enhance technological change. In this regard, business institutions and competition are crucial, but regulatory needs remain in order to safeguard continuity of knowledge creation. The framework allows for an analysis why overall adoption of eco-efficiency still can be considered relatively slow and why some markets and firms are far ahead. As a brief case study the article reflects upon German waste law's ability to enhance eco-efficiency.
Ressourcen
(2003)
The paper explores a framework for analysing governance towards sustainable development. Departing from the thesis about a possible positive role for corporate action, it refers to recent theorizing about both market and government failures. Discussing externalities, public goods, information and adaptation deficits, as well as bureaucracies' self-interest, corruption and capture of the regulator, the paper stresses the importance of governance aiming at synergies between corporate and political governance. Concerning framework conditions, it outlines principles of regulated self-regulation. Following the thesis about a positive role, the paper adds recent insights about theories of the knowledge-based firm, which help to analyse market evolution. In this context, it outlines the concept of "responsible corporate governance". Because governance involves actors in their daily operations and certainly goes beyond setting a frame, the paper finally discusses innovation-inducing regulation, serving complementary functions to a framework and business operations. The conclusion is drawn that governments' main function is to facilitate learning processes, thus departing from states' function as known from welfare economics. Thus, governance will have to be explored as collective learning, involving business, governments, and civil societies’ actors.
This article proposes a policy framework for analysing corporate governance toward sustainable development. The aim is to set up a framework for analysing market evolution toward sustainability. In the first section, the paper briefly refers to recent theories about both market and government failures that express scepticism about the way that framework conditions for market actors are set. For this reason, multi-layered governance structures seem advantageous if new solutions are to be developed in policy areas concerned with long-term change and stepwise internalisation of externalities. The paper introduces the principle of regulated self-regulation. With regard to corporate actors| interests, it presents recent insights from theories about the knowledge-based firm, where the creation of new knowledge is based on the absorption of societal views. The result is greater scope for the endogenous internalisation of externalities, which leads to a variety of new and different corporate strategies. Because governance has to set incentives for quite a diverse set of actors in their daily operations, the paper finally discusses innovation-inducing regulation. In both areas, regulated self-regulation and innovation-inducing regulation, corporate and political governance co-evolve. The paper concludes that these co-evolutionary mechanisms may assume some of the stabilising and orientating functions previously exercised by framing activities of the state. In such a view, the government's main function is to facilitate learning processes, thus departing from the state's function as known from welfare economics.
Rohstoffe - weniger ist mehr
(2007)
Die Erstellung von Gemeinschaftsgütern gilt als Problemfall für Märkte und ökonomisch handelnde Individuen. Das vorliegende Buch entwickelt einen neuen Ansatz, in dem Individuen und Unternehmen eine stärkere Rolle einnehmen. Anlass zur Markteuphorie ist jedoch nicht gegeben. Vielmehr ist es Aufgabe der Wirtschaftspolitik, solche Institutionen hervorzubringen, die das Handeln der Akteure auf direkte und indirekte Weise steuern. Dies wird im vorliegenden Buch als wissensbasierter Ansatz bezeichnet. Als Anwendungsbeispiel wird die Kreislaufwirtschaft analysiert. Ein Überblick, der die wesentlichen Thesen und Begründungsstränge enthält, führt in das Buch ein. Im folgenden Teil wird der wissensbasierte Ansatz modellhaft dargelegt. Erörtert werden die Bausteine Lernen, Kognition, Rationalität, deliberative Institutionenentwicklung und Wissen schaffender Wettbewerb. Für die Erstellung von Gemeinschaftsgütern wird ein Eigeninteresse abgeleitet, wenn der technologische und institutionelle Wandel entsprechende Signale generieren. Da beide Größen dem Einfluss von Individuen und Unternehmen unterliegen, entstehen Wechselwirkungen. Die folgenden Kapitel untersuchen den technologischen und institutionellen Wandel im Hinblick auf Potenziale zur Erstellung von Gemeinschaftsgütern. Dabei werden insbesondere neuere Unternehmenstheorien erörtert. Abgeleitet wird eine stufenförmige Grenzkostenfunktion für Institutionen und Organisationen. Ausführlich diskutiert das Buch Implikationen für die Wirtschaftspolitik. Es begründet und operationalisiert die Formulierung offener Ziele. Wirtschaftspolitik wird als Reform und Design von Institutionen konzipiert. Zu diesem Zweck werden zwölf Prüfkriterien formuliert. Dieses Konzept wird anschließend auf die Kreislaufwirtschaftspolitik übertragen. Defizite des Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetzes (KrW-/AbfG) werden herausgearbeitet. Als Reformen präsentiert das Buch neue Ziele, Wissen generierende Institutionen und ökonomische Anreize. Insgesamt ist das Buch als theorieorientierte Analyse praktischer Probleme geschrieben. Es folgt Ansätzen der Neuen Institutionenökonomik und der evolutorischen Ökonomik. Diese Ansätze werden auf die Analyse der Erstellung von Gemeinschaftsgütern und die Erarbeitung von Lösungsoptionen angewendet.