Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (27)
- Part of a Book (18)
- Contribution to Periodical (15)
- Conference Object (7)
- Working Paper (5)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (4)
- Book (1)
Eine nachhaltige Entwicklung und die dafür notwendige Steigerung der Ressourceneffizienz stellt für Organisationen und deren Akteure eine Herausforderung dar, die neben technologischer vor allem auch sozialer und organisatorischer Innovationen bedarf. Strategische Allianzen gehören zu den wichtigsten Nachhaltigkeits-orientierten Innovationen und ermöglichen als bereichsübergreifende Kooperationen wechselseitige Lernprozesse zwischen Wirtschaftsunternehmen, Staat und Zivilgesellschaft.
In dem Projekt wurde untersucht, welche Anforderungen an Unternehmen, ihre Managementsysteme, deren Personal-, Organisations- und Kompetenzentwicklungen sowie die Ausgestaltung der Arbeitsplätze gestellt werden, um nachhaltigkeitsorientierte Netzwerke und Allianzen erfolgreich und langfristig zu etablieren und ihren Wirkungsbereich auszubauen. Neben der systemübergreifenden Analyse stand die Entwicklung von praxisgerechten Lösungskonzepten und Instrumenten im Vordergrund.
Economic performance of a country is generally being measured through GDP (Gross Domestic Product), a variable that has also become the de facto universal metric for "standards of living". However, GDP does not properly account for social and environmental costs and benefits. It is also difficult to achieve sustainable decision-making aiming at sustainable progress and well-being if welfare is being considered from a purely financial point of view. The study highlights the benefits and some of the shortcomings of GDP. It serves as a helpful and practicable instrument for monetary and fiscal policies. The real problem presumably is that GDP growth is too often confused with (sustainable) welfare growth in people's minds. While there certainly is a correlation between the two, this study shows that this is a highly conditional correlation, void of substantial causality for GDP levels observable in the European Union. In order to be able to assess people's well-being and general sustainable development in the sense of sustainability, an alternative instrument going beyond GDP is necessary. Using so called SWOT analyses, several alternative progress indicators have been assessed in the context of this study. On the one hand it was analysed how far ecological and social factors can be integrated in the GDP measurements. Thereby difficulties arose then trying to monetise these factors. As a further possibility indicators were analysed which are to replace GDP as a whole. The category supplementing GDP seems to be the most realistic and acceptable option for going beyond GDP. Within this approach, GDP is being complemented with additional environmental and/or social information. In order to make this kind of solution feasible the study claims the establishment of an overarching and transparent indicator system for improving economic decision-making in support of sustainable development.
Towards a set of indicators on sustainable consumption and production (SCP) for EEA reporting
(2010)
The Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy and the UNEP/Wuppertal Institute Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP) set out to analyse Japanese dematerialisation and resource efficiency strategies within the 3R scope and searched for options of enhancing resource effi ciency strategies, commissioned by the German Federal Environment Agency. A further task of the project was to initiate a policy dialogue including stakeholders, academia, politics and Japanese and European environmental experts. The following paper summarises findings from the analyses, the results of the policy dialogues (Experts Workshop, 6 June 2007 and International Conference, 6 November 2007) and draws conclusions for a potential Japanese-European cooperation on the resource efficiency issue.
This paper looks at improving resource productivity at global value chains. Resource flows from its extraction through the manufacturing and use phase towards its end-of-life – increasingly crossing national boundaries. Effective improvement in resource productivity requires actions beyond a country’s territory. This article focuses on non-renewable resource flows and analysis how developed countries are involved in four distinct phases of global value chains, and how this involvement links to changes in resource efficiency. Resource extraction and associated early processes activities have been increasingly moved from developed to developing countries. Offshoring manufacturing activities also becomes a common phenomenon. Throughout these activities, lower rates of resource productivity during extraction and manufacturing are frequently observed, leading not only to international burden shifting, but most likely letting these burdens grow. If appropriate international measures across the global divides are applied, resource efficiency potentials could be realised through offshoring and global consumption and recycling could also offer opportunities for resource productivity. International actions to improve resource productivity can help to meet economic and environmental objectives at the same time over a global value chain. It could also safeguard countries against unintended indirect and side effects from the relocation of resource flows and help the private sector to benefit from opportunities in global markets for resource efficiency.