Open Access

Digital platforms may yield a host of advantages in putting circular economy into effect. This paper analyses the related chances and discusses requirements of digital platforms for the realization of a circular economy. It specifically points to potential solutions offered by digital platforms for existing barriers. From there it identifies issues that need specific attendance to create economically and ecologically functional platforms. Three economically relevant perspectives are discussed for this: a management perspective, a legislative perspective and a social/systems perspective.

Die voranschreitende Umstellung des Energiesystems von einer "additiven Rolle" regenerativer Energien hin zu deren Dominanz wirft zahlreiche Fragestelllungen auf, für deren Beantwortung in zunehmendem Maße Modellierungsansätze gewählt werden. Vor diesem Hintergrund ist in den letzten Jahren eine große Anzahl von modellbasierten Szenarioanalysen des deutschen Energiesystems entstanden. Da sie zum Teil sehr unterschiedliche Ergebnisse erzielen, die nur schwer miteinander vergleichbar sind, erschwert dies die Weiterentwicklung des Zukunftswissens zur Energiewende und auch die gegenseitige Qualitätssicherung der Ergebnisse. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat das Wuppertal Institut zusammen mit den Partnern Fraunhofer ISE und DLR das RegMex-Projekt durchgeführt. Ziel des Projektes war zum einen die inhaltliche Weiterentwicklung der Diskussion zur Ausgestaltung der Energiewende. Zum anderen sollte durch den Modellvergleich eine höhere Transparenz der teilnehmenden Modelle erreicht werden, um die Implikationen und Auswirkungen verschiedener Modellansätze besser differenzierten zu können. Im Modellexperiment 1 wurden für zwei Szenarien (Zielszenario und Ambitioniertes Szenario) das Gesamtsystem mit Hilfe von drei Energiesystemmodellen und im Modellexperiment 2 das Stromsystem und flexible Sektorenkopplung mit Hilfe von vier Stromsystemmodellen modelliert. In einem weiteren Arbeitspaket wurden "Disruptive Elemente" identifiziert und analysiert, die gravierende Auswirkungen auf das Energiesystem haben können. Die Modellexperimente zeigen klar, dass die Einordnung und Interpretation von Modellergebnissen nicht losgelöst von den Modellen und deren methodischen Unterschieden erfolgen darf.

The transformative research approach of Real-World Laboratories (RWL) has recently attracted attention in German sustainability science. Some definitions and understandings have been published, but guidelines and procedural quality criteria for establishing and running a RWL are still missing. To address this gap, this article has two aims. First, it aims to derive key components of RWLs from the current discourse on RWLs and similar, but more elaborated research approaches. Second, it aims to transfer these key components into a comprehensive research practice. This practice is illustrated by the RWL process in the project "Well-being Transformation Wuppertal" (WTW). Methodologically, the article builds on a review of RWL-related approaches for collaborative, intervention-oriented research. This includes transition management, transdisciplinary process models and action research. Based on this review, eight key components for RWLs are proposed. They position RWLs as a normatively framed approach that aims to contribute to local action for sustainable development and the empowerment of change agents. The approach uses transdisciplinary methods of knowledge integration and engages in cyclical real-world interventions within certain spatial and content-related boundaries. The components are transferred into a flowchart, detailing process steps, aims, responsibilities and overall principles for putting RWLs into practice. Thus, a hitherto missing tool for designing and running RWLs is provided. Then, the RWL in the district of Mirke, Wuppertal, is used as an empirical example to illustrate the application of the flowchart and related key components. Consecutive discussions centre on the different roles of researchers and practitioners in the research process, as well as the relevance of an underlying theory of change for effective interventions. Finally, critical reflection, application and amendment of the proposed flowchart are encouraged

The water-energy-food (WEF) nexus is increasingly recognised as a conceptual framework able to support the efficient implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Despite growing attention paid to the WEF nexus, the role that renewable energies can play in addressing trade-offs and realising synergies has received limited attention. Until now, the focus of WEF nexus discussions and applications has mainly been on national or global levels, macro-level drivers, material flows and large infrastructure developments. This overlooks the fact that major nexus challenges are faced at local level. Aiming to address these knowledge gaps, the authors conduct a systematic analysis of the linkages between small-scale energy projects in developing countries and the food and water aspects of development. The analysis is based on empirical data from continuous process and impact evaluations complemented by secondary data and relevant literature. The study provides initial insights into how to identify interconnections and the potential benefits of integrating the nexus pillars into local level projects in the global south. The study identifies the complex links which exist between sustainable energy projects and the food and water sectors and highlights that these needs are currently not systematically integrated into project design or project evaluation. A more systematic approach, integrating the water and food pillars into energy planning at local level in the global south, is recommended to avoid trade-offs and enhance the development outcomes and impacts of energy projects.