Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (1697)
- Part of a Book (1385)
- Report (1286)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (636)
- Working Paper (581)
- Conference Object (375)
- Book (178)
- Doctoral Thesis (91)
- Master Thesis (27)
- Periodical Part (17)
Language
Division
Auch der Verkehr muss zukünftig seine Beiträge zur klimapolitisch gebotenen Dekarbonisierung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft leisten. Dabei rücken insbesondere Segmente in den Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit, die sich durch ein besonders stark ausgeprägtes Wachstum auszeichnen. Dies trifft insbesondere für den Versandhandel und den Paketversand zu. Eine klimapolitisch bedeutsame Frage ist hierbei, wie sich das Wachstum des Versandhandels in einer Einkaufsverkehr und Güterverkehr integrierenden Gesamtbilanz auf die verkehrlich bedingten Emissionen von Klimagasen auswirkt. Welche Faktoren begünstigen eher höhere und welche geringere Emissionen? Wie wirken aktuelle Trends? Wie lassen sich diese Faktoren in einer Weise steuern, dass hieraus Beiträge zur Dekarbonisierung erwachsen können? Welche Akteure sind dabei jeweils besonders relevant?
Die vorliegende explorative Studie versucht auf einige dieser Fragen Antworten zu geben. Für die Beantwortung der genannten Fragen geht es zunächst darum, die Treiber des Wachstums im Versandhandel hinsichtlich ihrer Bedeutung zutreffend einzuschätzen. Untersucht wird dazu deskriptiv die Entwicklungsdynamik von Versandhandel und Paketversand. Zudem werden die hauptsächlichen Determinanten der Klimawirkungen von Versandhandel und Einkauf im stationären Einzelhandel identifiziert.
In 2016, the European Commission presented the Clean Energy for all Europeans Package , comprising legislative proposals to facilitate the clean energy transition within the EU, such as the revised EPBD 2010/31/EU and EED 2012/27/EU.Besides putting energy efficiency first and achieving global leadership in renewable energy, a third goal of the package was to provide a "fair deal to consumers" with "no one left behind"., While in some Member States the issue of energy poverty already was on the political agenda, enabling affordable access to basic energy services for all households and thus reducing energy poverty is now an explicit policy target of the revised EU Directives.
In order to assess and monitor the extent of the issue across the EU and address it by suitable measures, the concept of energy poverty needs to be defined, operationalised and measured. The paper aims to investigate the role of energy poverty indicators for policy making. To do so, it provides an overview on existing measurement approaches.Furthermore, the paper presents the development and current state of energy poverty across the EU using a set of four complementary indicators used by the EU Energy Poverty Observatory. These consensual and expenditure-based indicators are calculated using data from the EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions and the Household Budget Survey.
In addition, the paper highlights peculiarities of results on the different indicators, describes persisting issues with regard to their calculation and interpretation against the background of the underlying data base.
Based on the results of this analysis, further necessities of data collection and research are pointed out.
Improvements in energy efficiency have numerous impacts additional to energy and greenhouse gas savings. This paper presents key findings and policy recommendations of the COMBI project ("Calculating and Operationalising the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency in Europe").
This project aimed at quantifying the energy and non-energy impacts that a realisation of the EU energy efficiency potential would have in 2030. It covered the most relevant technical energy efficiency improvement actions in buildings, transport and industry.
Quantified impacts include reduced air pollution (and its effects on human health, eco-systems), improved social welfare (health, productivity), saved biotic and abiotic resources, effects on the energy system and energy security, and the economy (employment, GDP, public budgets and energy/EU-ETS prices). The paper shows that a more ambitious energy efficiency policy in Europe would lead to substantial impacts: overall, in 2030 alone, monetized multiple impacts (MI) would amount to 61 bn Euros per year in 2030, i.e. corresponding to approx. 50% of energy cost savings (131 bn Euros).
Consequently, the conservative CBA approach of COMBI yields that including MI quantifications to energy efficiency impact assessments would increase the benefit side by at least 50-70%. As this analysis excludes numerous impacts that could either not be quantified or monetized or where any double-counting potential exists, actual benefits may be much larger.
Based on these findings, the paper formulates several recommendations for EU policy making:
(1) the inclusion of MI into the assessment of policy instruments and scenarios,
(2) the need of reliable MI quantifications for policy design and target setting,
(3) the use of MI for encouraging inter-departmental and cross-sectoral cooperation in policy making to pursue common goals, and
(4) the importance of MI evaluations for their communication and promotion to decision-makers, stakeholders, investors and the general public.
What role do transaction costs play in energy efficiency improvements and how can they be reduced?
(2019)
Ex-ante policy evaluation requires a detailed understanding of how the subjects addressed by the policy react to its implementation. In the context of energy efficiency, policy measures typically aim at influencing investment decisions towards more efficient options.
As has been discussed widely in the context of the "energy efficiency gap", investments in energy efficiency improvements are frequently not conducted even though they seem cost-effective from a simple cost-benefit perspective, where transaction costs have been identified as one important barrier.
While transaction costs have been discussed widely from a conceptional perspective, empirical studies quantifying transaction costs and measures to reduce them are rare. This paper presents approaches, results and insights from a recently completed research project funded by the German Federal Energy Efficiency Center (BfEE), addressing transaction costs in various energy efficiency measures and the role of energy efficiency services to overcome the barrier.
We analyse a set of 11 energy efficiency investments covering private households, public institutions and the industry sector. We gather data on direct investment costs and energy cost savings and provide a detailed analysis of the various barriers and transaction costs associated with the implementation. We then analyse the costs of existing energy efficiency services using data provided by the BfEE. We compare the different cost elements and analyze the potential of energy efficiency services to reduce transaction costs.
We find that the role of transaction costs differs substantially between households, public institutions and companies and that the impact of energy efficiency services on transaction costs needs to be evaluated using different methodological approaches. We conclude that while data availability on disaggregated transaction costs is a major challenge, energy services can reduce transaction costs considerably.
Dieses Wuppertal Paper dient dazu, a) die mögliche Klimaschutzwirkung eines CO2-Preises zu analysieren, allein und im Gesamtpaket von Instrumenten zum Klimaschutz, b) die Möglichkeiten der Mittelverwendung zu analysieren und zu bewerten, c) dadurch den Dschungel der Argumente und Motivationen in den bestehenden Vorschlägen zu lichten und d) aus der Analyse ein Modell zu skizzieren, das den Anforderungen von Klimaschutz und sozialer Gerechtigkeit sowie Erhalt der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit am besten gerecht wird und damit der Bundesregierung als Anregung bei der Entscheidung über Einführung und Ausgestaltung eines CO2-Preises dienen kann.
Im Folgenden werden diese Fragen anhand von neun Thesen mit einem abschließenden Fazit ergründet.
Das Ziel der Akzeptanzstudie "Mieterstrom aus Mietersicht" war es, den Blick der Stromkundinnen und -kunden auf das dezentrale Versorgungskonzept "Mieterstrom" zu untersuchen und zu bewerten. Die Studie untersucht, inwiefern Mieterinnen und Mieter über das in ihrem Wohnhaus angebotene Mieterstromprodukt informiert sind, wie sie es annehmen und welche Faktoren die Akzeptanz beeinflussen. Dazu wurden 61 fragebogengestützte Face-to-Face-Interviews in sieben Mieterstromprojekten geführt. Die Bewohnerinnen und Bewohner gaben darin Auskunft zu ihren Motiven bei der Wahl ihrer Stromversorgung und ihrem Informationsstand. Außerdem führte der Autor der Studie, Markus Schäfer, leitfadengestützte Experteninterviews mit den Projektverantwortlichen der Mieterstromanbietern.
Die Ergebnisse bestätigen in großen Teilen die zu Beginn der Forschung aufgestellten Thesen. Das Mieterstrommodell ist selbst in Wohnhäusern, in denen ein Mieterstromprodukt angeboten wird, noch häufig unbekannt. Dies ist nicht nur auf unzureichende Information durch die Anbieter zurückzuführen, sondern auch auf das Desinteresse der Stromkunden am Thema Energieversorgung allgemein und als kompliziert wahrgenommenen Konzepten wie Mieterstrom insbesondere. Hohe Beteiligungsquoten konnten nur in Projekten erzielt werden, in denen die Befragten Faktoren wie die Nutzung erneuerbarer Energien und lokale Erzeugung bei der Wahl Ihrer Energieversorgung klar über den Strompreis stellten, oder in denen Mieterstrom besonders günstig angeboten wurde. Allerdings gibt es auch bestimmte Vertriebsmethoden, die zu hohen Beteiligungsquoten führen können.
Trotz der unterschiedlichen Rahmenbedingungen bei den untersuchten Projekten kann der Autor die Ergebnisse der Studie nutzen, um Handlungsempfehlungen für die Energiewirtschaft zur Erreichung höherer Beteiligungsquoten in Mieterstromprojekten zu formulieren.
In spite of differences in energy policies and supply, Japan and Germany have to master similar challenges: To reorganize the energy supply system towards - in the long term - being reliable, affordable, low in risks and resource use, and climate-neutral. At the same time, the ecological modernization should maintain or even strengthen international competitiveness. To better address these challenges, a bi-national expert council has been established between the two high-tech countries in 2016 - the GJETC.
The aim of the GJETC is to show that despite different starting points, a national energy transition can be more successful, if both countries learn from their strengths and also weaknesses, to avoid the latter. If the implementation of an energy transition in the two countries is socially and economically sound and advances technology innovation and deployment, it may not only double success, but can also serve as blue prints for other countries, especially due to learning from similarities and differences. For example: Why is per capita energy consumption higher in transport in Germany, but energy intensity higher in Japan's building sector? How can variable renewable energies be integrated in an efficient energy system at lowest costs?
The Council meets twice a year, holds stakeholder dialogues and outreach events, and prepares policy papers on strategic topics of mutual interest. Four comprehensive studies, each in cooperation of a German and a Japanese research institute, have been the basis for 15 joint key recommendations during the 1st phase. The 2nd phase to 2020 will study the role of hydrogen and digitalisation for the energy transition, as well as other topics. The paper presents the findings and recommendations of the GJETC of the first phase 2016-18 as well as first results of the second phase. It also reviews the setup of the GJETC and the way it works, to assess if and how it can serve as a role model of bilateral cooperation on the energy transition.
Europe needs a new vision of progress. An energy transition has this potential. It can give the "European idea" a future-oriented content. The goal for 2050 is clear: a Europe without fossil and nuclear energy! This is not a utopia. Studies, resolutions of the EU and some member states prove that this vision is feasible and has many advantages: more jobs, more security of supply, fewer premature deaths due to air pollution, reduction of resource conflicts, falling energy costs. New green lead markets for renewable energies and resource efficiency are emerging. A European energy transition requires an alliance, ideally fuelled by neighbours France and Germany. Many are hoping for Germany as a driver of nuclear and coal phase-out. But deciding on "revolutionary goals" is not enough: finally implementing them is what Germany and Europe are waiting for. This report shows which concrete steps can advance this vision of progress.
