Refine
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Part of a Book (70)
- Report (44)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (29)
- Contribution to Periodical (23)
- Working Paper (21)
- Conference Object (12)
- Book (10)
- Periodical Part (3)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
- Habilitation (1)
Dieser Beitrag stellt Ressourcenproduktivität als Kernstrategie vor. Schließlich kann sie nicht nur als Entschlackungskur fungieren, sondern auch als Innovationsmotor. Darüber hinaus wird ein Vorschlag zu einer internationalen Konvention für ein nachhaltiges Ressourcenmanagement gemacht, das vorhandene Verzerrungen reduzieren und zur Prävention von Ressourcenkonflikten beitragen soll. Erforderlich ist eine Sichtweise, bei der Material-, Energie-, Umwelt- und Technologieaspekte einerseits und internationale Entwicklungsaspekte andererseits integriert betrachtet werden. Schließlich geht es nicht um Rohstoffe als solche, sondern um ihre Funktion für menschliche Bedürfnisbefriedigung und Wohlstand. Nötig ist ein Paradigmenwechsel, in dem ein reines Angebotsdenken - welche Rohstoffmengen werden benötigt und wie können sie beschafft werden - zugunsten einer Systemperspektive überwunden wird.
Rohstoffkonflikte nachhaltig vermeiden : Rohstoffe zwischen Angebot und Nachfrage ; (Teilbericht 2)
(2011)
Rohstoffkonflikte nachhaltig vermeiden : Forschungs- und Handlungsempfehlungen ; (Teilbericht 5)
(2011)
Rohstoffe - weniger ist mehr
(2007)
The contribution of natural resources and ecosystems to economic processes still remains under-assessed by market evaluation and productivity analysis. Following the historical lines of the classical productivity debate ranging from the French Physiocrats to early neoclassical growth theories, the productivity concept underwent a gradual transformation from its previous understanding based on natural resources and other environmental factors to its contemporary narrow notion. This paper claims that the course of the classical debate has shaped the scope of predominant contemporary analysis. Except for some very recent findings, multifactor productivity largely focusses on a two-factor model. Material Flow Analysis (MFA) provides a useful step for widening the measurement and notion of productivity.
Über die Notwendigkeit einer Innovationsoffensive besteht weitgehend Einigkeit in Politik und Wirtschaft. Aber über die Richtung besteht Unklarheit. Das Buch zeigt auf, daß eine zukunftsfähige Langfristdynamik für Umwelt und Beschäftigung möglich ist. Allerdings muß das heutige Produktivitätsverständnis überwunden werden, das nahezu ausschließlich den Faktor Arbeit rationalisiert und keinen geeigneten Zugang zur Produktivität des Naturhaushaltes enthält.
Das Buch leistet einen wichtigen Beitrag zur ökonomischen Neuausrichtung des technischen Fortschritts.
Ressourcen
(2003)
Resource-efficient construction : the role of eco-innovation for the construction sector in Europe
(2011)
The Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy and the UNEP/Wuppertal Institute Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP) set out to analyse Japanese dematerialisation and resource efficiency strategies within the 3R scope and searched for options of enhancing resource effi ciency strategies, commissioned by the German Federal Environment Agency. A further task of the project was to initiate a policy dialogue including stakeholders, academia, politics and Japanese and European environmental experts. The following paper summarises findings from the analyses, the results of the policy dialogues (Experts Workshop, 6 June 2007 and International Conference, 6 November 2007) and draws conclusions for a potential Japanese-European cooperation on the resource efficiency issue.
While strategic studies on natural resources usually focus on the criticality of certain single materials, our paper starts from the inter-linkages between and among resources (called "the resource nexus"). It examines the impact any food and water stress may have on extraction activities in fragile states and regions. According to our approach, conflicts are likely to increase and may escalate in a number of countries, many of which are of relevance for the global supply of strategic materials. Future criticality for European and other industries, thus, is more likely to result from particular regions surpassing their adaptive capacities, and not mainly from limited availability or bottlenecks in the supply chain. The paper first develops a heuristic model of drivers for stress in resource-rich regions. Applying this approach, our paper then develops a global three-layered map along the dimensions of (i) future regional food and water stress, (ii) fragility of countries, and (iii) resource-rich countries with relevant reserves of strategic materials. As a result our paper tentatively identifies 15 countries at high risk and some 30 other countries being at relevant risk of causing resource supply disruptions. The conclusions underline the need to analyse those global inter-linkages and institutional mechanisms for strategic futures studies at a regional scale. As this may go beyond the capacities of actors on commodity markets, our paper also draws conclusions towards the establishment of an international data hub on the global resource nexus and for futures research. The paper points to some of the long-term implications of these issues.
This paper reviews the current EU policy framework in view of its impact on hydrogen and fuel cell development. It screens EU energy policies, EU regulatory policies and EU spending policies. Key questions addressed are as follows: to what extent is the current policy framework conducive to hydrogen and fuel cell development? What barriers and inconsistencies can be identified? How can policies potentially promote hydrogen and fuel cells in Europe, taking into account the complex evolution of such a potentially disruptive technology? How should the EU policy framework be reformed in view of a strengthened and more coherent approach towards full deployment, taking into account recent technology-support activities? This paper concludes that the current EU policy framework does not hinder hydrogen development. Yet it does not constitute a strong push factor either. EU energy policies have the strongest impact on hydrogen and fuel cell development even though their potential is still underexploited. Regulatory policies have a weak but positive impact on hydrogen. EU spending policies show some inconsistencies. However, the large-scale market development of hydrogen and fuel cells will require a new policy approach which comprises technology-specific support as well as a supportive policy framework with a special regional dimension.