Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (26) (remove)
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Report (18)
- Working Paper (4)
- Contribution to Periodical (2)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (1)
- Conference Object (1)
The paper reviews the current knowledge on the use of biomass for non-food purposes, critically discusses its environmental sustainability implications, and describes the needs for further research, thus enabling a more balanced policy approach. The life-cylce wide impacts of the use of biomass for energy and material purposes derived from either direct crop harvest or residuals indicate that biomass based substitutes have a different, not always superior environmental performance than comparable fossil based products. Cascading use, i.e. when biomass is used for material products first and the energy content is recovered from the end-of-life products, tends to provide a higher environmental benefit than primary use as fuel. Due to limited global land resources, non-food biomass may only substitute for a certain share of non-renewables. If the demand for non-food biomass, especially fuel crops and its derivates, continues to grow this will inevitably lead to an expansion of global arable land at the expense of natural ecosystems such as savannas and tropical rain forests. Whereas the current aspirations and incentives to increase the use of non-food biomass are intended to counteract climate change and environmental degradation, they are thus bound to a high risk of problem shifting and may even lead to a global deterioration of the environment. Although the "balanced approach" of the European Union's biomass strategy may be deemed a good principle, the concrete targets and implementation measures in the Union and countries like Germany should be revisited. Likewise, countries like Brazil and Indonesia may revisit their strategies to use their natural resources for export or domestic purposes. Further research is needed to optimize the use of biomass within and between regions.
Der Verkehrssektor verursacht rund 20 Prozent der Treibhausgas-Emissionen in Deutschland und ist damit unverzichtbar, um die nationalen Klimaschutzziele zu erreichen. Doch in keinem anderen Sektor liegen Wunsch und Wirklichkeit auf dem Weg zur Klimaneutralität noch so weit auseinander wie im Verkehrssektor. Die vorliegende Studie zeigt daher neue Wege für den Einstieg in eine klimaschonende und nachhaltige Verkehrswende in Deutschland. Sie liefert Handlungsoptionen für die Umsetzung der Ziele des Koalitionsvertrags zum Ausbau ambitionierter, digitaler Mobilitätslösungen.
Die Forschenden formulieren acht Thesen, wie sich das Potenzial der Digitalisierung für eine nachhaltige Mobilität nutzen lässt und welche politische Flankierung und Unterstützung dafür erforderlich sind. Entscheidend sei demnach die finanziellen und regulatorischen Leitplanken so auszugestalten, dass sie einerseits den schnellen Ausbau des digitalisierten Umweltverbunds vorantreiben und andererseits zu einer schrittweisen Eingrenzung des Pkw-Verkehrs führen.