Refine
Has Fulltext
- yes (29) (remove)
Year of Publication
Document Type
- Contribution to Periodical (12)
- Peer-Reviewed Article (10)
- Working Paper (3)
- Part of a Book (2)
- Conference Object (1)
- Report (1)
Die gestiegene gesellschaftliche Relevanz von Reallaboren für die Gestaltung einer nachhaltigen Zukunft wird durch den vermehrten Einbezug von Reallaborkonzepten in verschiedenen politischen Strategien auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene deutlich. Weniger klar ist bisher, wie Reallabore für eine umweltorientierte Digitalpolitik genutzt werden können.
Die vorliegende Kurzstudie "Reallabore als umweltbezogenes Politikinstrument" stellt konzeptionelle Grundlagen für Reallabore als Politikinstrument einer transformativen Umweltpolitik dar und leitet Handlungsempfehlungen für den zielgerichteten und wirkungsvollen Einsatz von Reallaboren im Rahmen einer umweltorientierten Digitalpolitik ab.
In der Kurzstudie werden im Sinne der Digitalagenda des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit Reallabore als "Experimentierräume für digitalbasierte sozialökologische Innovationen, in denen digitale Tools, Anwendungen und neue Kooperationsstrukturen entwickelt und modellhaft getestet werden können" verstanden. Es wird erläutert, dass Reallabore auf bewährten Handlungsansätzen aufbauen und im Kontext einer nachhaltigen Digitalpolitik eine geeignete Ergänzung und Weiterentwicklung bisheriger Umweltpolitik darstellen können. Um Reallabore für digital- und umweltpolitischen Ziele besser zu nutzen, werden die drei folgenden Strategien empfohlen: I) Förderprogramm für Reallabore der nachhaltigen Digitalisierung, II) Wissenstransfer für nachhaltigen Wandel in der Digitalisierung und III) Forschung zur digitalen und partizipativen Entwicklung von rechtlichen und planerischen Politikinstrumenten.
Das Wuppertal Institut hat das Forschungsformat der Reallabore
konzeptionell und praktisch entscheidend mitgeprägt. Insbesondere in den
letzten fünf Jahren erlebt dieses Format einen ungeahnten Aufschwung.
Vor diesem Hintergrund blickt der vorliegende In Brief auf die Perspektiven für die künftige Forschung in Reallaboren. Drei Forderungen sind dabei von zentraler Bedeutung:
(1) die Besinnung auf die ursprünglichen Kern-Charakteristika der Reallabor-Idee,
(2) der systematische Capacity-Aufbau für Reallabore im Wissenschaftssystem und
(3) die Etablierung von langfristiger angelegten Reallaborstrukturen.
Der NaWis-Verbund will Impulse für eine transdisziplinäre und transformative Wissenschaft geben. Dafür wollen die Partnerinstitutionen Forschungsmethoden entwickeln und diese in gesellschaftlich relevanten Problemfeldern anwenden. Zudem sollen Kriterien zur Qualitätssicherung und Wirkungskontrolle erstellt werden.
The Ernst Strüngmann Forum seeks to link justice, sustainability, and diversity agendas. In support, this chapter discusses how linkages between these three concepts have formed and changed in the climate change discourse, particularly in light of the recent Paris Agreement. As the latest addition to the portfolio of international climate change agreements, the Paris Agreement establishes a landscape in which nation-states, subnational actors, and transnational networks will be able to reconfigure existing linkages between sustainability, diversity, and justice, and perhaps improve upon them.
Here, three possible developments are identified which may substantially influence the reconfiguration process. Recognition is given to the sustainability and justice deficits that have plagued the "top-down" character of the international climate change discourse, and it is hypothesized that the Paris Agreement opens the door for "bottom-up" movements to claim a larger segment of climate change policy decision making and design. In turn, the "polycentric" landscape created by such "movement from below" appears to emphasize concepts such as inclusivity and transparency perhaps allowing for explicit climate justice commitments. Finally, to advance societal transformation and embrace diversity, it is hypothesized that the scientific endeavor needs to be transformed from a purely analytical pursuit to an effort that makes use of the wide range of scientific competences and provides support for transformative innovations to change unsustainable sociotechnical systems.
The transformative research approach of Real-World Laboratories (RWL) has recently attracted attention in German sustainability science. Some definitions and understandings have been published, but guidelines and procedural quality criteria for establishing and running a RWL are still missing. To address this gap, this article has two aims. First, it aims to derive key components of RWLs from the current discourse on RWLs and similar, but more elaborated research approaches. Second, it aims to transfer these key components into a comprehensive research practice. This practice is illustrated by the RWL process in the project "Well-being Transformation Wuppertal" (WTW).
Methodologically, the article builds on a review of RWL-related approaches for collaborative, intervention-oriented research. This includes transition management, transdisciplinary process models and action research. Based on this review, eight key components for RWLs are proposed. They position RWLs as a normatively framed approach that aims to contribute to local action for sustainable development and the empowerment of change agents. The approach uses transdisciplinary methods of knowledge integration and engages in cyclical real-world interventions within certain spatial and content-related boundaries.
The components are transferred into a flowchart, detailing process steps, aims, responsibilities and overall principles for putting RWLs into practice. Thus, a hitherto missing tool for designing and running RWLs is provided. Then, the RWL in the district of Mirke, Wuppertal, is used as an empirical example to illustrate the application of the flowchart and related key components. Consecutive discussions centre on the different roles of researchers and practitioners in the research process, as well as the relevance of an underlying theory of change for effective interventions. Finally, critical reflection, application and amendment of the proposed flowchart are encouraged
Labs in the real world : advancing transdisciplinary research and sustainability transformation
(2018)
There is a strong trend towards research in society-based laboratories,
especially in relation to sustainability. Semantic analysis reveals related discourses and emerging lines of inquiry, namely transformative potential, transdisciplinarity and learning. Real-world laboratories are a dynamic example of this research. Contributions of how to deepen and broaden their analysis are presented.
In this paper we highlight the importance of structural dimensions of real-world laboratories (RwLs). Giddens' structuration theory provides a promising framework to better understand the interlinked abstract and physical (infra-)structural features of RwLs. We argue that research on and in RwLs needs to be sensitive to the spatial, temporal, and thematic scope of structuration processes. A systematic conceptualization of these dimensions remains an important task for future research. In order to arrive at such a more in-depth understanding and possibly an improvement in the transferability of knowledge created in RwLs, the idea proposed by the WBGU should be taken up: building RwLs for the long term and focusing more explicitly on their structural dimensions. First steps have been taken in the German city of Wuppertal where a RwL infrastructure has been built up over the course of various projects including a broad variety of resources, actors, and topics in the broader search and learning process for sustainable transitioning.
Jointly experimenting for transformation? : Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them
(2018)
Real-world laboratories (RwLs, German Reallabore) belong to a family of increasingly popular experimental and transdisciplinary research approaches at the science-society interface. As these approaches in general, and RwLs in particular, often lack clear definitions of key characteristics and their operationalization, we make two contributions in this article. First, we identify five core characteristics of RwLs: contribution to transformation, experimental methods, transdisciplinary research mode, scalability and transferability of results, as well as scientific and societal learning and reflexivity. Second, we compare RwLs to similar research approaches according to the five characteristics. In this way, we provide an orientation on experimental and transdisciplinary research for societal transformations, and reveal the contributions of this type of research in supporting societal change. Our findings enable learning across the different approaches and highlight their complementarities, with a particular focus on RwLs.