Refine
Year of Publication
- 2020 (25) (remove)
Document Type
- Peer-Reviewed Article (10)
- Report (6)
- Conference Object (3)
- Working Paper (3)
- Contribution to Periodical (2)
- Part of a Book (1)
Division
- Nachhaltiges Produzieren und Konsumieren (25) (remove)
At the heart of transition research lies the question of how to "scale up" sustainable alternatives from a protected niche to the creation of mainstream practices. While upscaling processes are often seen as an essential element that contributes to societal transformation, upscaling itself remains a fuzzy concept. We argue that some fundamental dilemmas of upscaling can be identified, for example, the different understanding of the concept by researchers and practitioners. The dilemmas should be addressed in a more reflexive way by those from the worlds of science and practice who are involved in collaborative research settings.
In current German debates on sustainable urbanisation and urbanism, new urban actors reviving buildings, brownfields or whole neighbourhoods are discussed as potential drivers of urban transformation towards sustainability as well as potential co-producers for conventional actors in urban development and planning. These actor's projects can be understood as spatially confined niches for experimentation with (built) urban space itself. Building upon the concepts of niche entrepreneurship (Pesch et al., 2017) and the framework of strategic action field theory (Fligstein & McAdam, 2011; 2015), we ask how these actors secure support for their projects and how these projects in turn are altered in this process. Based upon a case study from Wuppertal, Germany, we show that in struggling for support of powerful actors, these actors often have to significantly compromise, and that these compromises can be understood as contextualisation in the project's spatial and institutional environment.
Many technical solutions have been developed to enhance the energy efficiency in buildings. However, the actual effectiveness and sustainability of these solutions often do not correspond to expectations because of the missing perspective of design, user's real needs, and unconsidered negative side effects of their use (rebounds). With the aim to help address these challenges, this paper presents results of a longitudinal living lab study and proposes a user-centered building management system (UC-BMS) as a prototype for office buildings. Based on mixed methods, UC-BMS was co-developed, tested, and evaluated in Germany in up to six office buildings, 85 offices, and within two heating periods. The results demonstrate that such user-oriented approach can save up to 20% of energy while maintaining or even improving comfort and work productivity. The findings show three main areas of intervention and elements of UC-BMS: (1) How interactive design and feedback systems (e.g., air quality) can stimulate ventilation practices and energy efficiency in offices and (2) supporting heating system optimization e.g., by better understanding office behavior. (3) Finally, an office comfort survey was conducted to enable communication between facility management and office users and thus limiting complaints and adapting the heating system towards actual office user needs.
Effective actions to mitigate climate change are urgently needed, especially in the context of cities, which are major sources of global CO2 emissions. Establishing and managing knowledge systems that integrate local knowledge can contribute to establishing more effective responses to climate change as well as transformative change towards sustainability. However, it is still unclear how new forms of urban governance should acquire, store, create, or disseminate knowledge for fostering sustainability transitions effectively. In this study, we present a multilevel knowledge system approach based on design principles informed especially by the knowledge management literature. These address (i) working environments across multiple levels, (ii) knowledge forms and types, and (iii) knowledge processes. We apply this approach to municipal climate action in the German energy transition. In particular, we focus on the operational work of municipal climate action managers of regional centers of Lower Saxony, one of the largest of the 16 federal states, and investigate their involvement in knowledge processes. Based on semi-structured interviews in 14 of the 17 regional centers, we show that structural pre-conditions for successful knowledge management and organizational learning are present. However, we also show that there is a need for improvement regarding (i) the multilevel coordination for accelerating routine operation, (ii) the persistence of local operational knowledge, and (iii) the exploitation of local innovations. Relying on these results, we offer general recommendations for municipal climate action and suggest that policies should (i) rely on local knowledge for effective decision-making, (ii) foster multilevel exchanges of explicit and tacit knowledge for implementation, and (iii) enable open-ended learning processes that leverage local innovations for creating usable transformational knowledge.
Recent research on the natural resource use of private consumption suggests a sustainable Material Footprint of 8 tons per capita by 2050 in industrialised countries. We analyse the Material Footprint in Germany from 2015 to 2020 in order to test whether the Material Footprint decreases accordingly. We studied the Material Footprint of 113,559 users of an online footprint calculator and predicted the Material Footprint by seasonally decomposed autoregressive (STL-ARIMA) and exponential smoothing (STL-ETS) algorithms. We find a relatively stable Material Footprint for private consumption. The overall Material Footprint decreased by 0.4% per year between 2015 and 2020 on average. The predictions do not suggest that the Material Footprint of private consumption follows the reduction path of 3.3% per year that will lead to the sustainable consumption of natural resource
Die explosive Verbreitung des Corona-Virus über die Welt brachte ein Realexperiment globaler Dimension mit offenem Ausgang hervor. Gesellschaften formieren sich, kosmopolitisch verschränkt, als Hygienegesellschaften. Zwischen striktem Lockdown und minimaler Begrenzung gehen sie je eigene experimentelle Wege. Dabei wird der Raum des Experimentellen bisher eher defensiv gestaltet, was in der Konsequenz zur Begrenzung experimenteller Räume sowie zur schleichenden Delegitimierung von Kontrollpolitiken der Pandemie führt. Die These dieses Beitrags lautet, dass solche Legitimationsprobleme umso eher gelöst werden können, je eher Strukturen resilienten Experimentierens entworfen und institutionalisiert werden. Ein wichtiges Ergebnis der Überlegungen ist, dass die resiliente Gestaltung experimenteller Räume zur Bewältigung solchen Krisengeschehens nur gelingen kann, wenn neben top-down verordneten Kontrollen sich eine bottom-up-Kultur sozialen Experimentierens entfalten kann. Dies setzt auf Seiten der Zivilgesellschaft ebenso wie von staatlicher Seite die Fähigkeit und den Willen zu Partizipation und Kooperation voraus. Entsprechende Ansatzpunkte werden dafür identifiziert.
With regard to residential energy use in the European Union (EU), most studies consider potential adopters of the technology (e.g., private owners) as being the sole decision-makers in the technology selection. However, during an integrated decision-making process (e.g., a construction project) multiple stakeholders will interact, influencing each other's judgement, thereby making it difficult to discern who is affecting the final decision, and to what extent. The goal of this study is to outline the full network of stakeholders involved in the decision-making process, along with their degree of power and interaction in the technology choice. For this purpose, empirical evidence from a multi-country survey is examined using social network analysis (SNA). The information is compared across building typologies, project types and countries (i.e., Italy, Spain, Germany, Poland, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). The results demonstrate that, in EU residential buildings, potential adopters of the technology are not the only stakeholders involved in the technology selection. They are in all instances in communication with multiple stakeholders, some of whom also hold a high level of power in the decision (i.e., key persuaders). Furthermore, their level of power and communication varies substantially across building typologies, project types and countries.
Die Wirtschaftsleistung von Deutschland ist durch die Corona-Pandemie stark beeinträchtigt. Um die Wirtschaft zu beleben, einigten sich die Regierungsparteien am 3. Juni 2020 in ihrem Koalitionsausschuss auf ein "Konjunktur- und Krisenbewältigungspaket" sowie ein "Zukunftspaket" in Höhe von insgesamt 130 Milliarden Euro. Für 2020 und 2021 sind fast 60 Maßnahmen vorgesehen, die von steuerlichen Vergünstigungen bei der Mehrwertsteuer bis hin zu konkreten Investitionen in Zukunftstechnologien reichen. Mit Blick auf den Klimaschutz beinhaltet das Maßnahmenpaket der Großen Koalition zwar gute Ansätze und viele wichtige Impulse, die allerdings zu verpuffen drohen, wenn sie nicht durch eine konsequente und nachhaltig ausgerichtete Klimapolitik flankiert werden. Zudem fehlen für den Klimaschutz wichtige Bereiche, wie Investitionen in die Kreislaufwirtschaft. Außerdem werden Maßnahmen zur Steigerung der Energieeffizienz nur unzureichend berücksichtigt. Gerade in diesen Bereichen hätten sich konjunkturbelebende Effekte und Klimaschutz in idealer Form ergänzen können, kritisiert das Wuppertal Institut. Dieses Diskussionspapier reagiert auf die vorliegenden Vorschläge und fasst zusammen, welche Maßnahmen im Rahmen der jetzt anstehenden Umsetzungsphase nachgebessert werden sollten und wo Ergänzungen notwendig sind.
Die gestiegene gesellschaftliche Relevanz von Reallaboren für die Gestaltung einer nachhaltigen Zukunft wird durch den vermehrten Einbezug von Reallaborkonzepten in verschiedenen politischen Strategien auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene deutlich. Weniger klar ist bisher, wie Reallabore für eine umweltorientierte Digitalpolitik genutzt werden können.
Die vorliegende Kurzstudie "Reallabore als umweltbezogenes Politikinstrument" stellt konzeptionelle Grundlagen für Reallabore als Politikinstrument einer transformativen Umweltpolitik dar und leitet Handlungsempfehlungen für den zielgerichteten und wirkungsvollen Einsatz von Reallaboren im Rahmen einer umweltorientierten Digitalpolitik ab.
In der Kurzstudie werden im Sinne der Digitalagenda des Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit Reallabore als "Experimentierräume für digitalbasierte sozialökologische Innovationen, in denen digitale Tools, Anwendungen und neue Kooperationsstrukturen entwickelt und modellhaft getestet werden können" verstanden. Es wird erläutert, dass Reallabore auf bewährten Handlungsansätzen aufbauen und im Kontext einer nachhaltigen Digitalpolitik eine geeignete Ergänzung und Weiterentwicklung bisheriger Umweltpolitik darstellen können. Um Reallabore für digital- und umweltpolitischen Ziele besser zu nutzen, werden die drei folgenden Strategien empfohlen: I) Förderprogramm für Reallabore der nachhaltigen Digitalisierung, II) Wissenstransfer für nachhaltigen Wandel in der Digitalisierung und III) Forschung zur digitalen und partizipativen Entwicklung von rechtlichen und planerischen Politikinstrumenten.