The article analyses Japanese approaches to dealing with eco-efficiency from an institutional perspective. Our main outlook is that though promising attempts have been made despite the overall economic crisis, a better horizontal coordination among both administrations and businesses is required. The governance processes can be analysed following approaches developed by New Institutional Economics and related policy analysis. The paper is divided into three sections. The first introduces the concept of eco-efficiency and explains the demand for regulatory policies from theories of market failures; the paper argues in favour of innovationoriented regulation. The second examines how a nation's institutional capabilities influence knowledge generation towards new solutions that sell on the markets; the "capacity-building approach" as developed by Martin Jänicke is explicitly discussed. The third section discusses contemporary Japanese policies with regard to waste, energy and material flows both on the governmental and the business level. It explains how European approaches diffuse and merge with domestic Japanese institutions. However, governance of eco-efficiency is expected to continue to differ due to ongoing national differences and specific conditions of knowledge creation.
The paper sketches out a theoretical framework for analysing the interplay between eco-efficiency, cognition and institutions. It derives from analytical shortfalls of the prevailing literature, which features strongly engineering and business economics, by using insights from New Institutional Economics, from Cognitive Sciences and, partly, from Evolutionary Economics. It emphasises the role cognition and institutions play in the adoption of "green" technologies by firms. A cognitive perspective derives from recent research on simple heuristics and context-based rationality; it is proposed that those recent findings can serve to analyse decision-making of individual actors or firms and, thus, should complement economic analysis. A second proposition is that eco-efficiency and normative rules such as a Factor Four strongly rely upon institutions, i.e. the ability of institutions to evolve over time and the development of those institutions that are most appropriate to enhance technological change. In this regard, business institutions and competition are crucial, but regulatory needs remain in order to safeguard continuity of knowledge creation. The framework allows for an analysis why overall adoption of eco-efficiency still can be considered relatively slow and why some markets and firms are far ahead. As a brief case study the article reflects upon German waste law’s ability to enhance eco-efficiency.
The paper explores a framework for analysing governance towards sustainable development. Departing from the thesis about a possible positive role for corporate action, it refers to recent theorizing about both market and government failures. Discussing externalities, public goods, information and adaptation deficits, as well as bureaucracies' self-interest, corruption and capture of the regulator, the paper stresses the importance of governance aiming at synergies between corporate and political governance. Concerning framework conditions, it outlines principles of regulated self-regulation. Following the thesis about a positive role, the paper adds recent insights about theories of the knowledge-based firm, which help to analyse market evolution. In this context, it outlines the concept of "responsible corporate governance". Because governance involves actors in their daily operations and certainly goes beyond setting a frame, the paper finally discusses innovation-inducing regulation, serving complementary functions to a framework and business operations. The conclusion is drawn that governments' main function is to facilitate learning processes, thus departing from states' function as known from welfare economics. Thus, governance will have to be explored as collective learning, involving business, governments, and civil societies’ actors.
The main objective of AIRP-SD was to address the urgent need to stimulate innovation in Research, Technological development and Demonstration (RTD) processes in order to enhance the prospects of RTD contributing positively to processes and strategies leading to radical improvements in the sustainability of production-consumption systems. This Milestone One Report was the first of three status reports, summarising the interim findings of the first three work packages since the start of the project in January 2002.
Globales Ressourcenmanagement : Konfliktpotenziale und Grundzüge eines Global Governance-Systems
(2007)
Global resource management : conflict potential and characteristics of a global governance regime
(2007)
Qualifizierungsmodul RessourcenKultur : Materialien zur Kompetenzentwicklung für Praktiker/-innen
(2014)
Wie lassen sich Wertschöpfungsketten im Zeitalter der Globalisierung ökologisch und fair gestalten? Konventioneller Kaffeeanbau führt gegenwärtig zu ökologischen und sozialen Problemen. Inwieweit kann Produktion und Vermarktung von Qualitätskaffee eine Alternative für Erzeuger und Verbraucher bieten? Aus den Erfahrungen kolumbianischer Kleinbauernorganisationen leiten sich Möglichkeiten und Grenzen dieses Ansatzes ab.
Also in the global South, transport already significantly contributes to climate change and has high growth rates. Further rapid motorisation of countries in Asia and Latin America could counteract any climate efforts and aggravate problems of noxious emissions, noise and congestion.
This Paper aims at connecting the need for transport actions in developing countries to the international negotiations on a post-2012 climate change agreement. It outlines the decisions to be taken in Copenhagen and the preparations to adequately implement these decisions from 2013. Arguing, that a sustainable transport approach needs to set up comprehensive policy packages, the paper assesses the substance of current climate negotiations against the fit to sustainable transport. It concludes that the transport sector's importance should be highlighted and a significant contribution to mitigation efforts required.
Combining the two perspectives lead to several concrete suggestions: Existing elements of the carbon market should be improved (e.g. discounting), but an upscale of the carbon market would not be an appropriate solution. Due to a lack of additionality, offsetting industrialised countries' targets would finally undermine the overall success of the climate agreement. Instead, a mitigation fund should be established under the UNFCCC and financed by industrialised countries. This fund should explicitly enable developing countries to implement national sustainable development transport and mobility policies as well as local projects. While industrialized countries would set up target achievement plans, developing countries should outline low carbon development strategies, including a section on transport policy.
Was ist der freiwillige Kohlenstoffmarkt - und welchen Beitrag leistet er für den Klimaschutz?
(2023)
In less than ten years, emissions trading has forged ahead as a climate policy instrument - from the setting of the agenda through the formulation of policy to the stage of implementation. This has happened at several policy levels: on the one hand, as international emissions trading in the framework of the Kyoto Protocol, and on the other hand as emissions trading for energy-intensive companies within the European Union. Not only because of the speed of the process, but also because emissions trading is generally being perceived as an effective means to avoid greenhouse gas emissions, ist introduction is mostly regarded as a success story. This claim is here critically examined with the help of a number of theoretical hypotheses borrowed from the field of multilevel governance research. The theoretical discussion is woven into a detailed descriptive-analytic account of the introduction of emissions trading, bringing out the most important players, conflicts and milestones in the process. What were the consequences of this rapid introduction for the interdependence of players and institutions in the multi-level policy system? To what extent was it accompanied with a transfer of authority from national governments to supranational or international institutions? Can we speak here of a further loss of sovereignty by national states in the age of globalisation? And has the introduction of emissions trading, as a new generation of climate policy instruments, brought about institutional changes in negotiation patternsand decision-making processes? This set of questions is being derived from the concept of multi-level governance which serves as the framework of analysis of this paper and is then being used to analyse fifteen theses in order to explain the complexity of the introduction of emissions trading and highlight problems and deficits in the negotiating processes. The aim of the paper is to give a answer to the question of whether the meteoric rise of the policy instrument may be described as a "success story".
In diesem Wuppertal Paper unternehmen Claudia von Braunmühl und Uta von Winterfeld eine begriffliche Erkundung im Spannungsfeld von Nachhaltigkeit, Globalisierung und Demokratie. Sie beziehen sich vorrangig auf die Arbeiten der Enquete-Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages "Globalisierung der Weltwirtschaft" (2002) und stellen das dort verhandelte Konzept von Global Governance vor sowie seine demokratietheoretische Schwächen. Des weiteren geht es um zwei Denkrichtungen, die den Autorinnen geeignet erscheinen, der politischen Dimension und Problematik von Globalisierungsprozessen gerecht zu werden. In einem Abschnitt über "Nachhaltiges Regieren?" skizzieren sie, entlang welcher Rationalitätsmuster die Demokratiedefizite in Verbindung mit Globalisierung und Nachhaltigkeit verlaufen und verknüpfen diese Überlegungen mit der Debatte, die derzeit zum Themenkomplex "globale öffentliche Güter" geführt wird.
A policy framework for sustainable resource management (SRM) is required both to guarantee the materials and energy supply of the EU economy and safeguard the natural resource basis in the future. Goals and strategies for sustaining the metabolism of the economy are described. Data are presented on the material throughput and physical growth of the EU's economy, on total material requirements (TMR), its composition, the decoupling from economic growth, and the increased shift to other regions. A first future target Material Flow Balance (t- MFB) of the EU is outlined. Detailed data reveal the "top ten" resource flows. Policy design for SRM should aim at an integrated and balanced approach along the material flow, comprising resource extraction, the product cycle and final waste disposal. Strategies and potential instruments to manage fossil fuels, metals and industrial minerals, construction minerals and excavation are discussed. Possible priorities and examples are given for target setting, focusing on limited expansion of built-up area, reduced use of non-renewables, increased resource productivity, and shift to sustainable cultivation of biomass.
Die Wirkungen von Stoffströmen sind abhängig von der umgesetzten Menge und den spezifischen Auswirkungen pro Mengeneinheit. Die Menge der Extraktion an Primärmaterial aus der Umwelt kann als vorsorgeorientierter Indikator für ein unspezifisches Umweltbelastungspotential herangezogen werden. Die Materialintensitäts-Analyse ermittelt den kumulierten Materialaufwand (=Material Input) nach fünf Hauptkategorien und setzt diesen in Beziehung zum gewünschten Nutzen (= pro Service-Einheit). Beispielhaft wird die Materialintensität verschiedener Systeme der Energieversorgung und des Wasser- und Abwassermanagements verglichen. Ein integriertes Ressourcenmanagement schließt bei einer umfassenden Systemsicht neben einer Minimierung des Ressourcenaufwandes auch die Verminderung kritischer Emissionen ein. Es erfordert ein sektorübergreifendes Stoffstrommanagement und die Berücksichtigung ökonomischer, technologischer, organisatorischer und sozialer Aspekte sowie der regionalen Besonderheiten. Ansätze hierzu werden vorgestellt.
Policies for Sustainable Use and economy-wide Management of natural Resources (SUMR) throughout the production and consumption system are faced with environmental and socio-economic requirements and regulatory constraints. Based on empirical findings of ongoing trends of resource use, decoupling from economic growth, and transregional problem shifting, the paper outlines a potentially sustainable biophysical basis for production and consumption in the EU. It discusses the main challenges for the major resource groups, describing the specific and the common tasks with regard to biomass, fossil fuels, metals, non-metallic minerals. Adopting a medical metaphor, it suggests that policies for SUMR should follow a dual approach reflecting the long-term need for a main cure of the socio-industrial metabolism in form of a "conditioning" towards a more mature, resource efficient, and renewables based constitution on the one hand, and a fine tuning of selected material flows (e.g. for optimized recycling and control of hazardous compounds) on the other hand. Both strategies are deemed complementary and necessary to reduce environmental impacts and increase the utility of material use. Action required is exemplified with regard to the three pillars of SUMR, i.e. improved orientation, information and incentives.
The paper reviews the current knowledge on the use of biomass for non-food purposes, critically discusses its environmental sustainability implications, and describes the needs for further research, thus enabling a more balanced policy approach. The life-cylce wide impacts of the use of biomass for energy and material purposes derived from either direct crop harvest or residuals indicate that biomass based substitutes have a different, not always superior environmental performance than comparable fossil based products. Cascading use, i.e. when biomass is used for material products first and the energy content is recovered from the end-of-life products, tends to provide a higher environmental benefit than primary use as fuel. Due to limited global land resources, non-food biomass may only substitute for a certain share of non-renewables. If the demand for non-food biomass, especially fuel crops and its derivates, continues to grow this will inevitably lead to an expansion of global arable land at the expense of natural ecosystems such as savannas and tropical rain forests. Whereas the current aspirations and incentives to increase the use of non-food biomass are intended to counteract climate change and environmental degradation, they are thus bound to a high risk of problem shifting and may even lead to a global deterioration of the environment. Although the "balanced approach" of the European Union's biomass strategy may be deemed a good principle, the concrete targets and implementation measures in the Union and countries like Germany should be revisited. Likewise, countries like Brazil and Indonesia may revisit their strategies to use their natural resources for export or domestic purposes. Further research is needed to optimize the use of biomass within and between regions.
Was ist gerecht? : Nutzungsrechte an natürlichen Ressourcen in der Klima- und Biodiversitätspolitik
(2004)
Was ist gerecht? In einer Welt zunehmenden Zugriffs auf die Natur stellt sich diese zentrale Frage auch für die Nutzung natürlicher Ressourcen. In der internationalen Umweltpolitik bildet daher die Verteilung von Nutzungsrechten den Hintergrund für zahlreiche kontroverse Debatten. Diese werden exemplarisch für die Politikfelder Klima- und Biodiversitätspolitik nachvollzogen. Zunächst wird die Frage diskutiert, in welchem Umfang ein Land die begrenzte Absorptionsfähigkeit der Atmosphäre nutzen darf. Gibt es ein historisch gewachsenes Anrecht oder, im Gegenteil, eine daraus erwachsene Verantwortung für Emissionseinsparungen? Müssten nicht Staaten mit größeren finanziellen wie technologischen Kapazitäten beim Klimaschutz voranschreiten? Aus dem Spektrum der möglichen Antworten wird in diesem Papier das Prinzip gleicher pro Kopf-Rechte an der Nutzung der Atmosphäre als Leitbild zukünftiger Vereinbarungen in der Klimapolitik favorisiert. Um diesem Leitbild nicht bloß auf zwischenstaatlicher sondern auch auf innerstaatlicher Ebene Geltung zu verschaffen, wird die Einrichtung von nationalen "Klimafairnessfonds" vorgeschlagen. Analog dazu stellt sich die Frage in der Biodiversitätspolitik: sollte jede WeltbürgerIn das gleiche Recht auf Zugang und Nutzung des genetischen Codes von Pflanzen haben? Oder müsste nicht vielmehr die Pflanzenwelt eines Landes der staatlichen Souveränität unterstellt werden? Wie sind in diesem Kontext Patente auf einzelne Pflanzenbestandteile zu bewerten? Gerechte Nutzungsregeln für pflanzengenetische Ressourcen, so das Fazit dieses Papiers, erfordern eine Stärkung der Rechte indigener und lokaler Gemeinschaften gegen über privaten Nutzungsansprüchen. Die Suche nach einem verallgemeinerbaren Prinzip für die Zuerkennung von Nutzungsrechten an natürlichen Ressourcen läuft daher ins Leere. Vielmehr muss der jeweils unterschiedliche Charakter einer Ressource und ihr spezieller sozio-ökonomischer Kontext berücksichtigen werden. Darüber hinaus erfordert trans nationale Ressourcengerechtigkeit, nicht nur den Staat sondern auch subsidiäre Ebenen wie die einzelne BürgerIn oder lokale/regionale Gemeinschaften als potenzielle AdressatInnen von Rechten in den Blick zu nehmen.
Was ist gerecht? : Nutzungsrechte an natürlichen Ressourcen in der Klima- und Biodiversitätspolitik
(2004)